Henri Pirenne and why the 'Dark Ages' occurred.

Henri Pirenne was an early to mid 20th century historian who specialized in the 'middle period' between the 'fall' of Rome [itself a myth]; and the creation of the Christian theocratic state circa 12th century. Pirenne was an uncommon genius who basic thesis was and is correct; the so-called 'Dark Ages' of Europe lasted from the mid 7th century to the mid 10th, and were initiated not by the demerits and intolerance of a Christian church, but by the stark reality of Arab attacks, conquests and the sealing off of the Mediterranean sea – the most vital link in intra- and extra- European trade, cultural exchange and development. He was right. We know this because he is denounced so viciously by academics.

Pirenne's master piece was his 1937 publication in French of 'Mohammed et Charlemagne'. In over 150 well sourced and detailed pages he elucidates his case that the Arab attacks on Europe including their takeover of Sicily, Spain by 650 AD, and the relentless piracy and littoral invasions which lasted from 650 to about 950 AD [when the Spanish Reconquista really got underway though the Spanish Christians did stop the complete takeover of Spain with their victory at Covadonga in 720 AD], was responsible for the demise of what was then a vibrant set of civilizations.

Pirenne's theory is not met with much favor by current academia – besotted and in love as they are with all things Islamic. According to the 'orthodox' theory of historical development parlayed by the great minds at Western universities and research centers the Muslims were far more advanced than the cowering, dirty midgets of Europe circa 640 AD. Only Muslim enlightenment saved Europe from a permanent Dark Age. The Muslims were not only responsible with saving Greek and Roman literature, culture and societal innovations, but imparted these onto the backward Europeans through such venues as the Muslim city of Cordoba in Spain, or the interaction of Muslims in Baghdad with the theocratic and darkly superstitious Christian fanatics in Constantinople. According to this 'accepted' view Islam was a force for good, transferring the ideas of civilization from the East to the backwards West and ensuring that Europeans did not revert back to Cro-Magnon times. We should all be thankful then for the advance of Islam.

To say that the above is patently stupid is to make an understatement. Even Bernard Lewis the so-named 'Sage of the West' in his latest book in 2008 on the West and Islam, forwards the illusion that the Muslims were advanced and the Christians in Europe and North Africa backwards. Reality and archeological evidence, as forwarded by Pirenne make this theory a laughingstock. The Fall of Rome as most serious students of the subject will know, was actually a benefit for much of Europe. Long before 476AD Rome had long ceased to be of much use. It was an oriental despotism, with high taxes, a far ranging and corrupt bureaucracy and endless civil and internecine warfare which destroyed wealth and the lives of generations. By 476 AD Rome was already managed by Germanic chieftains and the ending of the reign of the last Emperor Romulus, by the Teutonic Chief of Staff Odoacer – done at the behest of the Eastern Empire – was not a crash heard round the world, but a mere formality in which the Germans formally took over the empire they had so long dominated.

Pirenne's archeological proof makes another key point. Post 476 AD the former Roman state in Gaul, Spain, Italy and North Africa flourished. The Gallo-Roman elite essentially carried on the Roman empire's institutions, trade, road building, colossi construction, and culture. Nothing changed. In fact, as Pirenne proves, the new states became wealthier. Without the dead hand of the Roman-Oriental state, the new powers were able to increase trade, reduce taxes and improve productivity. Archeological evidence makes it clear that from 500-650 AD the former Western empire was far wealthier, more integrated and more cultured than at any time in its history. The Gallic dynasty of the Merovingians for example, were literally covering their public buildings in part with silver, gold and gaudy emblems of wealth. Western Europe was no poor backwater when the Arabs invaded the European-Gallo Vandal empire of western North Africa in 635 AD. It was rich, sophisticated and elaborate.

Real world facts make this obvious.

Why then did Europe decline from 650 to about 950 AD? The main reason is the most obvious. The Arab conquests sealed off the Mediterranean sea and cut North Africa off from Europe. Eastern trade so vital to the wealth of Europe and so necessary for its intellectual, material and even cultural development was severed. So too was papyrus. For 1000 years the Egyptian supply of paper was an extraordinarily key aspect of Euro-Romano development. When this supply was ended circa 640 AD, the Europeans had to turn to the inferior use of cowhides or parchment. This made writing, record keeping and literacy far more difficult to sustain.

The Arabs and Muslims far from being peaceful, civilized and nuanced progressives – as forwarded by Lewis and the orthodox academic community – engaged in a 400 year concerted attack upon the European coastal areas. After conquering Spain and Sicily the Arabs tried to conquer France [failing in 732 AD at the Battle of Tours], and engaged in endless littoral piracy, literally annihilating Christian shipping and port activity. Many European ports became emptied first of ships, than of goods and people. As trade declined the entire economy suffered. Even the coinage of money became difficult and gold and silver coins were replaced by cheaper bronze units.

The 3 'lost centuries' were basically a dark age caused by the siege of Europe initiated by the Muslims. We know this to be true because the Eastern Roman empire of Byzantium suffered a similar fate. The Byzantine empire became a lot poorer, less educated and suffered economic and population contraction during the exact same period as the 'Dark Ages' took hold in the West.

When the Christians ended the Muslim siege starting in about the mid 10th century their economy, wealth and spirits recovered. It led directly to the aid of the Eastern Empire and the creation of the Crusades. After 400 years of Arab aggression the Christians had recovered enough strength to counter-attack and end Islamic hegemony of the crucial Mediterranean sea.

These are common sensical, black and white facts, supported by archaeology, contemporary accounts, and comprehensive research. Pirenne is entirely right. The 'Fall of Rome' was not a catastrophe but in many ways a positive development. Europe went into a 3 century decline thanks to the Arabs. This however, offends the current zeitgeist that the Arabs and Muslims created the modern world. This fallacy is deep rooted in Western culture and academia. The reality is that the Arabs and Muslims created and still create destruction, death and anti-civilizational practices and attitudes.

This is why Pirenne is condemned by the modern historian-community. He was right. They are wrong. And the little academic minds will unite to crucify those who dare to speak the truth.

Suffering through the Koran, Sura 43 'Gold Adornments'.

Gold and 'vanities' have no importance according to the Koran. Only Allah has import. Supplicating your will to the moon deity Ali-ilah of Mecca, is your sole duty in life. If you reject the Meccan moon cult and play with trifles, gold or silver objects, 'false gods', and engage in egocentricity, you will be, as the Koran makes very clear, burned and punished in Hell [43:74]. Intolerance parading as a religion. How farcical and yet the really smart people constantly intone that 'Islam is peace'. Yes, and Hitlerism was only a misunderstood movement to restore Germanic volk pride. Sura 43 is remarkably little different than the first 42 Suras. Doesn't insanity constantly repeat itself ?

The Koran is so repetitive that you have to be an illiterate boor to both read it, and believe it. There is little in the first 43 chapters or Suras which imparts anything close to an intelligent plan of ethics or metaphysics. The injunctions on each page are depressingly monotonous – worship only the Allah cult; obey without question the so-called 'prophet' the mad Mohammed; and if you don't conform to what the Koran dictates, you will be killed and burned in Hell. Oh, and Jews and Christians are inferior and should be either converted or killed. Consider this from Sura 43:

“And never came there a prophet to them but they mocked him. So We destroyed (them) – stronger in power than these; - and (thus) has passed on the Parable of the peoples of old.” [7,8]

One can find such a sentence on almost any page in the Koran. All ancient Jewish and Christian prophets were really Muslims. When their populations rejected them, the Muslims, through the magical power of the moon deity Ali-ilah, destroyed them. Thus did the ancient empires in and around the Arabian peninsula rise and fall. It was the work of the great one [not Obama], Allah.

The promise of an afterlife to right practicing Muslims was a key attribute and attraction for those who converted to the Meccan death cult. Be a good little Muslim man and you will find yourself in a happy after-life with gold, women and wine: “...We raise to life therewith a land that is dead; even so will you be raised (from the dead); -......To them will be passed round, dishes and goblets of gold: there will be there all that the souls could desire, all that the eyes could delight in: and you shall abide therein (for ever).: [11 and 71].

Being a good Muslim means for the most part following the rituals and laws of the Koran. This includes hating Jews and Christians. If you want the babes, the gold, the wine and the eternal life of heaven granted by the Meccan moon deity Allah, you better avoid the Jews and Christians and their evil ways;

“Or do they think that We do not hear their secrets and their private counsels? Indeed (We do), and Our Messengers are by them, to record.” [80]

Infidels can't hide from the omnipotent moon guy Allah. Once he finds out their plans, they are doomed:

“The sinners will be in the punishment of Hell, to dwell therein (for ever): Nowise will the (punishment) be lightened for them, and in despair will they be there overwhelmed.” [74,75]

If you the Muslim stray into the path of the infidel you must, “..turn away from them, and say 'Peace!' But soon shall they know!”[89]. In other words turn away and ignore the infidel Jews and Christians for Allah will exact his retribution upon them, whether they know it or not. Hell is their destiny. If you the good Muslim follow the diktats of the cult you will be blessed. But if you stray from Islam and become an apostate or if you are a Jew or Christian and do not convert to the moon cult and continue to ignore the glorious power of the Meccan deity you are doomed since, “The Qu'ran is indeed the Message, for you and for your people; and soon shall you (all) be brought to account.” [43]

Brought to account means an eternity of punishment, hellfire and torture. Most ancient peoples it can be assumed would prefer to avoid such a fate. Fear mongering, threats, coercion and predictions of eternal damnation do not a religion of peace, gratitude, or compassion make. They are the expressions of Oriental despotism and fascistic paganism – which is what the Arabian moon cult has always been. A cult fascinated by death, power and killing those who don't follow the Meccan moon deity Ali-ilah.

[Note: This sura is taken from 'The Holy Quran', translated by Abdullah Yusuf Ali, reprinted in 1995, Goodword Books. Regarded as one of the best translations from Arabic to English of the Koran.]

The great socialist experiment of Eurotopia, the Euro and its inevitable collapse.

Greece going bankrupt is a mere foretaste of what awaits the benighted socialized Eurotopians, resplendent in arrogant and corrupt socialism. Worse fates do await than the mere bankruptcy of a small, unimportant state. Debt, inflation and Islam – the great killers of civilization – all greedily prowl around the wounded Eurotopian state.

How about this as a prediction for the Eurotopian state, the nirvanic future of man, or so we are told.

Debt implosions and civil strife thanks to the endless child-like fascination with complete governmental control over society ?

Or perhaps a 'kind, peaceful' Muslim population explosion from the current 30-40 millions or 15 % of the population, to 35% within 30 years, with most of the 100 million Meccan moon cult followers swarming and dominating Euro urban centres ?

Or maybe it is the 1-2 punch - first financial insolvency, economic and political chaos, followed by the Muslim counter-revolution to finish off what Charles Martel in 732 and King Sobieski in 1683 prevented – the Islamification of Europe ?

Europeans have a penchant after all for Totalitarian ideology. They might enjoy being moon cult members – even insolvent ones.

In any event, debt, inflation and Islam are somewhat more relevant concerns than Globaloney Warming, UN resolutions against Israel, or the EU regulatory fascination of managing toilet seat size, and the naming conventions of mustard. The 'root cause' of Eurotopian destruction lies in two completely irrelevant and vicious anti-humanist philosophies - Soft power theology, and Cultural Marxism. Both are twisted, sick cults premised on self-loathing and state power. They also lead to bankruptcy and collapse.

Soft power equals soft heads. It is an excuse for external inactivity or apathy, in which basic needs such as self-defence, military readiness, and moral clarity are replaced by Janus-faced hypocrisy, free-riding off the military of other states, and immoral duplicity in geo-politics. And it induces the creation of government ownership of vast tracts of socio-economic life, which replaces real culture with state worship. It certainly does breed a population of juveniles and self-loathing narcissists, who can't see beyond their next gratification, endless years in 'university', the welfare sponsored vacations they have a human 'right' to, or the government cheque paying for their pet's dog food.

Soft power leads for example to the absurdity of funding Islamic fundamentalism and Arab violence against Israel; doing 'deals' with the Arabs no matter how corrupt, ruthless and viciously anti-Western they are to ensure that the oil flows and that state-owned Eurotopian oil firms profit therein; demanding that US troops remain in what are suppose to be mature countries; and laughably and cynically spending only 2 % of national budgets on military security but over 50% on the buying of votes and social communalisation evinced in health-care, welfare and the subsidies which support the huge political-big business-union complex. Soft power creates collective madness and weakness.

With government owning 50% or more of the Eurotopian political-economy, one can legitimately term the EU a modern feudal state with the Brussels technocracy replacing the once divinely sanctioned roles of Lords, Bishops, and Dukes. However, the ancient feudalism's had the will, the cultural attitude, and the men to defend what was thought important. Not the Eurotopia of today. No Eurotopian nation outside of Lesser Britain can project a large military force within or without the Eurotopian border. With assets flung across the world, the Eurotopians rely on the UN or the US to protect what it cannot plausibly defend. A defenseless state, is alas, not a state, but just a hotel or a spa.

Soft power does not garner respect or love, it attracts violence and contempt.

The other 'progressive' 20th century 'innovation' of socialist Eurotopia is of course that of post-modernism and its derivative of cultural Marxism. [The 'great man' the Prophet Obamed is its mindless modern expression and apogee in America]. This cancer is as widespread as that of soft-headed power. Cultural Marxism is a disease of the mind, spirit and body which includes an open hatred for Judeo-Christianity, the normative family, Roman and Germanic-English Common Law traditions, free markets, individualism and all aspects of Western history and development.

The cultural Marxist 'school' was populated in its formative and now fully developed stages by Marxists, socialists, communists and Nazi supporters. Its infectious cancer now controls in Europe and North America, the media, education, and most political parties. Political correctness, 'Islam is Peace', a hatred of the human, 'Globaloney Warming', anti-Semiticism, antipathy to men, and the moronic association of 'conservatism' with Hitlerism; are just some aspects of cultural Marxist buffoonery. When the culture undergoes such a massive shift from the real to the surreal, and from the basic constructs of what makes civilisation, to mores and ideals which promote self-loathing, revisionism, mindless politics, and capitulation to a 7th century Arab moon cult, the end is not hard to predict.

The Eurotopians don't just suffer from a staggering debt load of some 200% of GDP or $25 Trillion. They also have to contend with future off-the balance guarantees for health, pensions and welfare totalling some $124 Trillion or 11 times current GDP. Europia is bankrupt – it actually owes $150 Trillion or almost 4 times the size of the entire yearly world economy. There is no possibility that the EU Marxists can possibly pay off these liabilities. Even by doubling taxes, doubling immigration to increase tax revenues; and levying 'Mother Earth' sur-charges or 'fees', on anything to do with carbon, the Europians have no hope to pay off their debt and off balance sheet obligations.

Here is what will most likely happen in the Europia:

-Huge tax increases which contract economic growth, slow investment and destroy jobs will lead to huge real unemployment rates of 30-35 % [today it is about 15- 20% in real terms].

-The economic reality that even with a doubling of taxes, all containing garment-rending descriptions [children's future, Mother Earth, no dog food for old people...etc.], will not solve the Europian debt crisis [tax revenues actually go down, beyond a certain rate level]. The state will be forced to cut social spending by some 30-50%, leading to massive civil unrest.

-The Euro out of necessity will be disbanded. You can't have a fixed exchange rate in a zone in which Malmo, Manchester, Mons, Madrid, Milan and Munster have absolutely nothing in common in terms of economic or trade cycles.

-Eurotopian bond rates will rise dramatically as bond holders demand a higher return for their risk, making raising money and sustaining the Mommy-state very difficult.

-Money will be printed in excess of economic and population growth. Inflation is assured. Eurotopia will use the printing presses to help 'stimulate' economic growth and debt payments.

-Interest rates must rise to combat real inflation which will soon be at 7-10 % per annum, further stultifying investment and economic growth. Stagnation will result in widespread civil and political strife and conflict.

Add to this mix, the rise of Islam, and the expansion of the Meccan moon cult from some 30-40 millions, to some 100 millions and you have the obvious fact of Eurotopian disintegration on every political-economic level. The only question is what will the post-Eurotopia Europe look like and when will it occur?

Modern Eurotopian experiments have centred around paternalistic communalism. Hitlerism and Communism were bastard twins of Marxism of course, which varied by degree not intent. Perhaps with financial bankruptcy a guarantee, the Eurotopians in all their 'educated sophistication' might indeed desire to join the Arabian moon cult. Mohammed after all was a precursor of Hitler. It seems that the Eurotopians feel rather comfortable with an anti-Semitic pagan-Fascism. Once they become insolvent, a 7th century pre-modern society might suit them very well.

In any event the unhappy collapse of yet another Marxist-Socialist Eurotopian attempt at socialist engineering will wipe out the wealth, hopes and perhaps even the lives of millions. But no worries, the Eurotopians are very preoccupied with biking helmet regulations and reducing natural Co2 emissions by forcing people to drive silly little cars and walk to work. Busy little minds, busy with nothing of any importance.

Debt, inflation and the Government lust to control housing.

The great governmental experiment, replicated almost across the world, in 'managing' housing 'ownership rates' and mortgage financing, which has been on-going for some 40 years, has ended in a catastrophic recession which cost over 20 million people world-wide their jobs and incomes. Stock market declines, still 30% below their artificial peaks, have appropriated some $4 Trillion in wealth across the globe – much of that increased wealth was of course ephemeral and unfounded but nonetheless real. Yet the worse is yet to come. Debt and inflation the great killers of empire, are now rearing their mephistophelian faces. There is nothing to prevent the next crisis from happening. As sure as government's will keep interest rates close to zero for a long time, so too will the next rounds of economic contraction materialize.

Government's grand foray into housing has resulted in monumental failure and the worse shall certainly come to pass. The great minds who individually and through the collective auspices of state incursion and power created the current crisis, are now ensuring that debt, inflation and the erasure of supply-side forces which create jobs and wealth will all be controlled and partially erased which only guarantees a second and probably third crisis. Watching this infernal destruction is like reading a Greek tragic-comedy – you know what will happen but cannot stop the plot. The impact on normal people by the technocratic elite's mis-management of affairs both economic and political is a colossal travesty. Yet few blame the actual perpetrators, preferring, as the rich, egotistical and fantastically hypocritical denizens of Davos and the World Economic Forum give evidence, to blame the 'market'. Perhaps, one might surmise that the Jew, or the Globaloney Warming will be cited as the progenitors of the housing finance criminality.

And criminal it is. The facts are plainly obvious to anyone not soaked in the mire of socialist-cultural Marxism, or deformed by state and media propaganda. Starting in the 1950s and 60s, governments across Europe, North America and in parts of Asia and the Middle East, began to view housing as a political tool, a cheap way to buy votes and an effective means to manage their citizenry, creating a static cadre of easy to tax, and regulate knaves. US Presidents set 'housing ownership targets', with the absurd 19th century view that owning a house was the surest way to social and community stability – and the easiest way to raise 20th and 21rst century government revenues.

Perhaps the American ideal that everyone must own a home was valid in the 19th century, when police forces, sundry laws, and the absence of enforcement were real facts in everyday life. Someone owning a home in 19th century America was less likely to steal cattle, shoot people, poison water wells, or engage in drunken brawls at the local tavern. The obvious smallness of life, and the necessity to be a good citizen would make such behaviour entirely counter-productive. Owning a home, farming plotted land, and engaging in local trade and social hobbies was a pre-requisite for 19th century America to develop. So was land based mortgage financing based on the 1865 Homestead Act which provided much needed capital to American growth and industry.

But none of the above applies in the 20th or 21rst centuries. American and Euro banking has become a political tool of esoteric financing and sophistry. The idea that Wall Street or the City in London, is the economy is totally absurd. Much of good banking is local with local banks lending to local clients, in which both understand local conditions and the importance of contracts. Once you make the technocratic jump to assume that high investment banking is the economy, you make the jump from the real to the surreal and eventually land in the world of political-banking corruption.

Politicians through land restrictions have ensured that land and house supply in major areas of economic activity are restricted and 'managed' driving up prices. A shack along the highway in San Fran costs $600.000 and no one can afford the 20% down-payment which was the historical 19th and 20th century norm. So lending rules are relaxed, no down payments are needed and speculation premised on cheap money and low interest rates naturally follows. The end result is not hard to forecast. Massive market distortions in supply and demand always lead to a crisis and atonement.

Land policies are just one of many market dislocations created by government. Subsidies to minorities, people on welfare and mortgages to anyone who wanted to buy or assume the risk, dominated both the US and European housing markets. Transfers and tax breaks to construction firms to 'create' jobs mandated that the housing madness continue. Housing at one time constituted 15% of the US economy. No politician would countenance a reduction in subsidies to home buyers, because that would reduce home construction, which would impair all the fake jobs being created, many of them used to mop up the vast hordes of illegal immigrant labour looking for work. The cycle of destruction once started, could only pick up speed and vigour.

The same was true in Europe which had a large influx of Eastern Europeans and Balkanites to deal with, not to mention those fun, happy and entirely peaceful Muslim migrants. The EU programs were basically the same as the US – land restrictions, subsidies, construction jobs supported, no or little money down, and lax monetary policy all dominated European housing finance. From 1990 to 2005 housing prices almost doubled in many Euro centres. Housing was deemed a sure bet – people need to live somewhere don't they ? - and the politicians had every incentive to keep their banks, the construction firms and their 'unemployment' rates [always a lie], happy.

EU banks also used the reserve ratio system to its fullest. For every $100 of deposits perhaps $1 would be kept on hand. The other $99 would find its way into personal and business loans, inter-bank loans, and investments. The Europeans placed a huge bet not just on the ineluctable and permanent rise of EU house prices, but also on the future wealth of their neighbours to the East. The Euro banks used their ratio banking system to invest not just in housing and the profitable 'sub prime' market which in both the US and EU accounted for some 30% of bank profits, but also in the emerging markets of the former Soviet Union. Money flowed East without much regard to real profit returns, sanity of the investment, or even the efficacy of the political system of the receiving state.

The result was and is predictable – EU banks now have some $2 Trillion at risk in Eastern Europe, enough to bring down the entire EU reserve-ratio banking system. This is why the government subsidy and legerdemain with the banking world will continue with more bailouts and more rhetoric about the 'end of the world' if the banking system is not supported with more debt and tax money. With Greece, Portugal Italy and Spain – all economies which bet massively on housing – now tottering on bankruptcy, the entire EU project could be riven and shattered by debt and bank write-offs. The same fate awaits the US.

The summary is obvious. Politicians and bureaucrats were using the banks and the housing system to further their own needs and goals. Along with controlling speech, information, travel, education and culture, the ability to control one of the primary needs of man – a place to live – is a goal that all states lust after. A stationary man, owning a home, is an easier prey for government. Higher taxes, regulations, carbon controls, eco-enforcement, and the use of state coercion are markedly enhanced when the human unit is static and unarmed. Your house can and will be a target. This is why governments are so adamant that 'tax evasion', offshore accounts and human mobility have to be curtailed.

Government's are very determined to have everyone own a home. It stimulates 'jobs' and provides profits for their banking friends – usually the same people who are massive contributors to political campaigns. Home ownership benefits the nexus of banking-government and politicians.

Government's dear regard for housing has nothing to do with social cohesion or community love. There is no proof whatsoever that owning a home will make you a better human. It might make you more aware of responsibilities and could induce you to become a model citizen, but it also limits your ability to escape the ravages of government power.

You can't run or hide from government once you are static and disarmed. You can't pick up your house and sprint from the carbon regulation police for example which enters your house, and who are very interested in the contents of your refrigerator, the carbon content of your underwear, or the mother-earth friendliness of your appliances. Houses are not portable. After all selling a house is expensive, time consuming and not as simple as selling a stock. And once you are in a home especially with children, your ability to avoid government sur-and tax regulation is very limited indeed. Ergo the great minds educated in the Ivy League and the sanctified halls of what Europe calls higher education, and who now run the world, are quite interested in home ownership.

So much easier to have a feudal society when the peasant is tied to the land.

We can therefore expect what caused this crisis, namely government interference in housing to continue forever - until the centers of technocratic power are broken.

A Marxist celebration – the Prophet's $4 Trillion tax and spending increase.

The most important man in history [at least in his own little mind], unveiled a colossal disaster parading as a budget. It is so bad that the investment rating agency Moody's predicts that US debt will go from Triple A to Double A within the next 4 years. That is a merry understatement. In the real world the Prophet Obamed's budget [blessed be the new Prophet], will ensure high future inflation, and most likely national insolvency. This is because debt and government – must like water bursting a dam and flooding the hinterland – will only recede after massive destruction and chaos. The Marxist dream of the Prophet leads ineluctably to bankruptcy.

In the past one year alone, the Prophet and his friends of statists, corrupto-crats and Dum party technocrats have taken 4% of the US economy and handed it over to the state. Fully 40% of the US economy is now controlled by government. In 2010 and 2011 another 5-7% will be transferred from the private sector to the state as outlined in the great man's recent budget. Thus within 3 years some 48% of the US economy will be under state control. The same level as France, and closing in on Sweden. One has to assume that the Euro-fems and the UN will become more pro-American, as the Black Jesus transforms America into a greater version of Scotland, a state in which 2/3 of GDP is now initiated by the loving and caring mommy-state.

In the next 3 years there will be $6 trillion in national debt and deficit spending alone, which will push US national debt to $19 Trillion. In 2001 under GW Bush the 'compassionate' big-spending conservative the US debt was $5 Trillion. By 2008 GW and his big government friends, including the Democrat controlled congress post-2006, elevated the debt to almost $10 Trillion – proving that Bush was of course a hard-core Christian 'conservative'. For the Black Jesus the path paved by Bush is clear – double the debt again, to 150% of declining, and stagnant GDP. Why not ? Technocratic governance and elitist management is apparently what all Americans desire.

So in a mere 15 years the US will see its national debt increase by 400%. No state or empire in history has ever survived such a run-up in financial stupidity and impropriety. And this does not account for the state bankruptcies of California, the liberal-Marxist nirvana of eco-fascism and socialism, or of New York, both of which will occur at some time, once Federal bailouts cease, due to Federal insolvency.


And this does not include the crass idiocy of socializing the 50% of US health-care which is not already under the control, and bankruptcy of government, and which will add $1 Trillion per year to the US deficit.

One can also add to the Prophet's Marxism the unaccountable and quite mad printing presses of the Federal Reserve central bank. Some $2 Trillion in bad assets and mortgage backed securities are held by the Fed purchased by printed money. This is 15% of the entire economy. Getting rid of this debt will destabilize the banking sector and the stock markets. There is also the little fact that the US money supply has increased at 10% per annum over 10 years on average. Given that the real US economy has contracted in that period [GDP is a scam, and once you normalize for real inflation it is obvious that the US economy is at best stagnant and probably in an economic decline]; the real net worth of America and Americans, has declined by some 20% in the past few years.

There are few choices left for the Americans. Total national, household and corporate debt will soon be at 400% of GDP or some $60 Trillion. This is impossible to support. Off the balance debts for health care, pensions and government guarantees and welfare are another $100 Trillion over the next 20 years or some $5 Trillion per annum. The real US national debt today is thus, about $17 Trillion, rising by some $6-7 Trillion each year. This is about half of the size of the real, and quite weak economy. No state in history has been able to withstand, social, civil and financial collapse from such a load of government created debt.

Thus the choices facing America are ugly, uglier, and ugliest. The orgy of government madness can only be supported by inter-alia; a doubling of taxes; more printing of money and a devaluation of real debt obligations; selling national assets such as land, parks, and firms; and the appropriation of private property and wealth, outside of direct taxation. There is no possibility that any American politician will reduce spending, reduce government or contract state obligations. No politician will lose votes, his seat or the privileges of power by denying to the mass, what the mass believes are 'human rights'; namely, free health-care, pensions, welfare and subsidies.

To keep their power politicians and their media slaves will engage in making government ownership and power a 'moral' issue. They will interview and cite inter-alia:


starving poor people eating dog food who need more welfare;

old people who can't afford diapers and who wet their pants and need government health care;

illegal immigrants beaten up by White KKK members who need government protection;

minorities who can't get into Harvard because Whitey and his racist ideology want to keep them on the plantation, thus mandating more state-affirmative action;

various 'common people' raped, violated and enslaved by big banks, big business and the criminal class called businessmen;

children whose future has been annihilated by the emissions of Co2 and the ersatz destruction of glorious, good, and happy Mother Gaia;

and cute, furry, cuddly little animals -like carnivorous polar bears - who are suffering from the human created abuses of Globaloney Warming.


All of these and more need the loving protection of government necessitating more spending, more state control and more brain-washing.


The destruction of states and empires always ends up in the hands of some incompetent joker like the Prophet Obamed. The man has never had a real job and never managed an entity in his entire life. He is good at reading a computer tele-prompter however. Yet he and his technocratic Harvard trained monkeys believe that they can double the debt; print money without consequences and transfer 10% - 25 % of GDP from the private sector to government. By so doing they will make America better or so they intone.


Most clear thinking people did not buy into American decline during the 1980s and 90s when Japan was going to rule the world, or the Soviet 'model' would prove itself superior. But with the advent of European socialism; and cultural Marxism in the guise first of Bush and now Obamed; the thesis of decline is real and relevant. The Americans will have a very hard time getting themselves out of this government induced, and empire limiting disaster. Government and state power is always the problem. And once out of control it can only end up in two places; bankruptcy or civil rupture.

Economic Lies – US GDP ‘Growth’ [Hardy Har Har]

There are 4 great economic lies foisted on the hoi-polloi by chattering economists who know very little about the economy, and government – statist politicians and bureaucrats who know even less than the economists. GDP, inflation, unemployment and ‘the consumer is 70% of the economy’ are mendaciously deceitful and illiterate. Damned lies all of them. So when the Black Jesus and his cabal of Chicago-crooks announce that US GDP grew 5.7 % [oh how very precise], in Q4 2009, have a good laugh. It is all bull-puddy.

The great economic lies:

1 and 2) GDP and CPI

A great website which debunks the GDP lie is John Williams’ www.shadowstats.com which clearly shows that the US Federal government intentionally distorts both GDP and CPI. GDP is nothing more than a spending algorithm [see here for why it is a fraud, http://craigread.com/displayArticle.aspx?contentID=1242&subgroupID=6] and has little relationship to the real economy. Originally devised by Kuznets in 1934, its intention was merely to provide a rough gauge of government policy on the very broad macro-economy. Now, somehow, 80 years later, it is a sacrosanct measurement of all transactions and trade within a state.

GDP is a grotesque assessment of the economy. It includes inter-alia:

-All gross consumer spending [you could go borrow $10.000 on your credit card, spend it, never pay back your debt and presto! GDP grew by $10.000]

-All Government spending and welfare transfers [no debt, no interest costs and no costs for printing money]

-Net of Exports minus imports [you could stop imports tomorrow and presto! the GDP just went up]

-Subjective assessments by politicians and bureaucrats [some 30% of GDP is complete guesswork, which makes the precision of the number so laughable ie. 5.7 % Q4 2009 growth. Oh please.]

GDP is a rube’s rubric. It has little relationship with reality. If you were to borrow a few Trillion from the Chinese and build mini-Versailles’ across the country, the GDP would accelerate by the level of what was borrowed. In the real world, the economy did not grow since it was artificially stimulated by debt. Yet for economists there would be breathless joy at the increase in macro-economic activity.

Add against this illusion the real facts of inflation. Again government's ‘manage’ the inflation number to their advantage. So more than 50% of the usual household costs in food, energy and housing is left out of the inflation calculation. Another ‘innovation’ from the Clinton era. As Williams’ shadowstats.com website makes clear, real inflation is well above 5% for the average person living in the real world in America. If you were to apply this true inflation ‘deflator’ against the government sponsored GDP lie, the actual economy growth is negative.

3) Unemployment

Roughly speaking if the government disinformation ministries who need to buy votes, have high approval ratings and demonstrate that ‘they are doing something for the little guy’, tell you that unemployment is 10% than the real number is at least 20 %. One must double the government propaganda to get a truer estimate of economic un and under-employment. Another recent political invention is to leave off the unemployment number those who have stopped looking; those who are under-employed; those who can work but have doctor certificates ‘proving’ that they can’t; and those on government work-fare programs, most of which only supply a few hours a week of work. Add in these groups and the rate would surely double.

The other way to view this lie is to look at the real numbers and trends in employment levels. All people between the ages of 18 and 60 can work. You can strip out; students, retirees, those who choose to manage the home [but are not on welfare]; and those with legitimate injuries who can’t work. Everyone else must be counted as being employable. The real ‘employment’ rate should be therefore about 85% - yet we know that in Western states no more than 65% of the employable are actually working.

4) The consumer is 70% of the economy !

Business and the suppliers of jobs and capital are 70% of the economy, not the consumer. The real value added size of a state’s economy, if calculated correctly, would make it obvious that business and the transactional values in the business supply-retail chain, are the driving factors in economic growth. This fact would force politicians to switch from demand/consumer side management to supply-side, and pro growth management policies which include tax and spending cuts. Since politicians want to increase their power by taxing more and spending more, the insanity of the claim that the consumer is the economy [and therefore needs to be managed, given welfare, and has to be supported against business by the government], is assured.

[For some details on why this is an evil lie see [http://craigread.com/displayArticle.aspx?contentID=776&subgroupID=12]

These 4 key distortions do however feed the stock market, people’s psychology and inform large corporate spending and budgetary plans. There are also accepted by the mainstream media as ‘facts’ – as much as Keynesian economics forwarded by the charlatan and effete homosexual Keynes, is accepted by academe as an ‘iron law’ of macroeconomics. What is needed are real numbers and analysis which would lead ineluctably to real proposals to increase the size of the real economy which is only provided by the suppliers and actors in a private market, not by government.

Managing Minds. The apogee of State power.

In lieu of a coherent philosophy of life, tribal or national purpose, and a strong culture of responsibility and individuality, the state will expand to fill the void. When spiritual emptiness is combined with cultural self-loathing, historical revisionism, and general apathy, the state will intercede to fill the vacuum. State education, media, and endless propaganda will always demonize opposing centers of power and exalt the communal. When the individual only feels ‘fulfilled’ as a part of the ‘community’, the state will have succeeded. This is how individual states and empires enter the long road of stagnation and failure – the religiosity of the state.

History is basically the storyline of one overarching political-social battle – that between the state and the individual. The rise of the individual is the most important factor in creating the modern world. Those world systems which have not placed the individual at the center of the political-economy are the ones who are the least developed and the poorest in all matters of social-economic and moral development. Witness Islam as a prime example, or the current and much over-stated ‘rise’ of India and China – both very poor states which thanks to limited modernization and globalization have released 500 million people from lives of crushing poverty and inconsequence.

The ethos of the individual is particularly a Western only phenomenon. It arises from two distinct and over time, interwoven revolutions. The Jews from at least 1400 BC under the military leader Moses [the episode on Mt. Sinai and the 10 ‘words’ or commandment revelation by ‘God’ was a necessary ploy to defuse a rebellion and meld the leadership of the ‘church’ and state under Moses’ command, he was of course first and foremost a military genius], infused Egyptian monotheism with distinctly Hebraic forms of ethics and responsibility giving rise to individualized salvation, esteem, and the concept that each person had a purpose. The Jews were the first to not only guarantee the sanctity of life [they ended child sacrifice and were the first to implement laws against murder], the right to own private property, but also to expect earthly and heavenly rewards for good behavior. The Jewish conception of God or Good, was a normalizing factor in creating a social system in which different opinions, views and politics could be tolerated without resort to bloodshed.

The high Greek ideal about the importance of the individual and his right to privacy, ownership, and self-worth put the Greek states at such odds with the Orientalism of the Persian empire. The Greeks believed in historical cycles, but that importantly, humans were directly responsible for the outcome of what happened in the modern world, even if they were abetted by their pantheon of ‘Gods’. In war the Greek farmers, artisans, craftsmen and traders would fight as free men, and would squabble not only amongst themselves but with their political and military masters. In peace the Greek free-man would not willingly bow to any cult, or leader, which castrated freedom of expression, trade and individual initiative. This dynamism made the ancient Greek world a checkerboard of rivalry, conflict and chaos.

This endless penchant for robust intra-Greek conflict and dissension is remarkably similar to that shown by the Jews throughout their history. The Jewish state even today is riven by many factions – secularists, Hasidic fundamentalists, Ashkenzai-Kibbutzim Socialists, Sephardic immigrants from North Africa, military ‘hawks’, and Peace Now! activists. The Jews like the ancient Greeks view conflict as a necessary corollary of freedom.

Not so today. The crushing power of the state distorts all activities and minds. The cultural Marxism which stands athwart real progress and intelligence, is a state managed, state funded and state supported disgrace. There is no quicker way to destruction than to corrupt and infect minds with mindless statist propaganda and deny the right to think, criticize and act as individuals. The trend in Western states is not hard to see. The rise of the state – even in the face of tepid Globalization – is a fait accompli. Witness the following:

-Governments in most Western states including now the USA, control 45% of GDP [a bad measurement but a proxy alas].

-Real tax appropriation levels when all taxes and ‘fees’ [which are taxes but not named as such], and regulatory costs [which increase the price of products such as food, or medicine], are 45-50%. Historically such levels provoked civil wars.

-The utter mindlessness of Globaloney Warming being paraded as a fact in schools and on state media outlets.

-The state educational complex moving from ‘hard’ education to ‘softer’ mores, including homosexuality support, an animus towards the traditional family, and an outright hatred of Jews, and Christianity.

-The obsession with games such as the Olympics or other mostly meaningless sports triviality as defining in some measure ‘national worth’ [as opposed to freedom, wealth creation, rights and laws, and an appreciation of culture and history].

-State controlled media brainwashing the masses about ‘values’, and national ‘attitudes’ which have nothing to do with Western civilization and everything to do with increasing communal and state power.

-Unfettered Muslim immigration and the elevation of Islam as a ‘religion’ and one absurdly enough, dedicated to ‘peace’.

-Anti-Semiticism.

-State management of the economy. Only the ‘state’ can ‘prevent’ economic ‘cycles’ and ensure that the consumer which is purportedly 70% of the economy [a grotesque lie], will be ‘protected’ from the greed of big business.

The increase in state power runs amok. Historically such a predilection against the individual always ends badly. The state itself usually goes bankrupt – first morally, second militarily and third economically. The West will suffer the same fate. The question is not if, but only when.

Europe sliding towards the abyss. Wilders on trial.

As expert of Muslim dhimmitude, Bat Ye'or, wrote about the Wilders trial:

“Westerners have been conditioned by their governments, their media, the Palestinisation of their culture and societies, to be the culprit and to accept without a murmur the continuous harassment of the permanent terrorist threat. Such terrorism has taken already many innocent lives and wounded countless others since it started, in the 1960s, in Europe with the collaboration of Palestinians and Nazi groups murdering Jews and Israelis.

In view of an aggressive indigenous and foreign terrorism within the Netherlands itself, it is clear that Geert Wilders is answering a provocation against him that obliges him to live under permanent security controls. How is it possible that in the XXIe century, in a democratic and peaceful Europe, some people, politicians, intellectuals, cartoonists or others, need 24-hour security when they have done nothing but lawfully express themselves ? Will self-censorship define our culture?” http://www.internationalfreepresssociety.org/2010/01/the-trial-of-geert-wilders-a-symposium/

How true. We have the ironic and dangerous conflation of several misbegotten European ideals which now threaten to strangle the West.

The first is the idea which is never supported, never proven, and never discussed that Islam is a religion and that all religions are equal. Islam is a Meccan moon cult, some 5.000 years in existence, with ali-ilah or Allah as the family moon deity of Mohammed. Islam is no more a 'religion' in the Western sense, than Scientology.

The second dangerous misconception is that criticism of anything non-White, or non-European is somehow racist. The cultural Marxist theology of relativism informs all students, academics and the media, that no system, no set of facts, no history, no culture and no ideals are better than any others. Thus Haiti is an infernal sewage pit, not due to the Haitians, their culture, their lack of systems, ethics, or institutions, but rather do to bad luck, White racism, neo-imperialism and maybe even Globaloney Warming. In this vein, Muslims, who are brown skinned or black converts for the most part, are 'victims' of the Whites. Islam is thus a 'defensive' ideology of protection.

The third insipid idea which Ye'or alludes to, is the ignorant and hypocritical over-reach of state power. What bureaucrat or government agency has the authority or the intelligence to tell individuals what they can or cannot think, say and write ? Why are some groups chosen as winners – Gays, Muslims, the Multi-cult – and others picked as losers – White males, Christians, and increasingly Jews ?

The fourth objection which follows from the cultural Marxism which now ravages the Western world, and which Ye'or calls 'self censorship', is the arbitrary and always changing nature of the 'law'. The EU enshrines the protection of free speech – subject to many caveats. These caveats morph, expand and become more opaque with each passing year. And they are never implemented with equality or justice. Thus the mad Imman in Amsterdam can quote supremacist hate from the Koran, denouncing infidels and assuring his wide-eyed Muslim audience that Allah will rule the world. But a Dutch politician like Wilders can't criticize the pagan Fascism of an Arabian moon cult or call into question why the Koran is considered a holy book [is Mein Kampf now holy ?].

Europeans are a rather dumb lot if their political elite is any indication. Here we have the Arabian moon cult dedicated to fusing church and state; enslaving women in bed sheets; killing young girls; eradicating free speech; hostile to modernity, markets, civilization and capital – and the Euro idiots can't make the connection between Russian or German Fascism and Mohammedanism. So they do the illogical and fascistic and persecute those who oppose Arab Fascism. Very smart. The Meccan moon cult is a pre-modern Fascism and has nothing in common with European history, ideals or culture. Yet the gaping morons in socialized Europe, are unable to understand the obvious. So the Muslim immigration continues, the state funding of mosques, Islamic schools, brainwashing programs, and media censorship proceeds apace and Europe stands ready to fall.

This will all be especially true if Wilders is convicted of a 'hate' crime against the modern variant of age-old Fascism. If Wilders is exonerated there might still be hope. But it as well, might only be a Pyrhhic and temporary victory.

Europeans might think they are sophisticated and intelligent. Any rational observer looking on at what is going on with the Wilders trial, European demography and the crushing burden of the mommy-state would decide that the exact opposite applies. The Europeans are akin to little children; ignorant, gullible and incredibly nescient.

Haiti: The largest per capita international welfare transfer in history.

The latest Haitian catastrophe will easily attract $2 billion in capital and emergency aid from around the world. This would give Haiti, with a population of some 9 million, well over $ 5 billion in welfare transfers in the past 10 years alone. This computes into the staggering total of over $550 for every living soul. It is the largest per capita transfer of wealth in history – 5 times greater in per capita terms, than the Marshall plan which saved Europe from starvation and began to rebuild its shattered economies in 1948. Yet we have some 'really smart people' intoning, with professorial baritones, that Haiti needs a 'Marshall Plan'. What ? It already has the Marshall Plan, times 5.

Russian Fascism, named Communism, was an obvious existential and military threat to Western Europe post 1945. The Americans for a variety of geo-political, moral, cultural and self-interested reasons had little choice but to provide, what was then, history's greatest welfare scheme to the shattered remnants of 'allied' states. The Marshall plan was successful. It fed and clothed Europe, and initiated enough economic strength to create employment. It staved off internal civil war, discord, and a Red takeover. It was a singular and intelligent act. Total US aid to Europe between 1945 and 1952 totaled some $25 billion for over 250 million people – or some $100 per person. This was 10% of US GDP. The return on this investment has been infinite.

Haiti has received the Marshall plan 5 times over – at least on a per capita basis. Can anyone imagine this total ? Is Haiti 5 times worse off than war ravaged, and annihilated Europe in 1945 ? Hardly. Here we see Haiti receiving 5 times the aid received by Europe and yet Haiti is still, well Haiti. But, say the very concerned people - what about all the natural disasters ? Surely we must repair all that infrastructure, housing, and all the medical facilities, logistics and communications infrastructure so recently built up ? Perhaps. If there was any of the above, you might have a good argument.

The sorry fact – black and white – is that nothing has been built in Haiti at all, with any of the huge transfers given to it by the international welfare system. Nothing. In 2005 and 2006, US congressmen who wanted to investigate where $100 million went for the 2004 Hurricane-disaster relief, were told, not so politely, to leave the country, while they still had their heads on their shoulders. The same will happen post 2010. Any of the mighty and moral who donated money to one of the world's greatest human-created nation state disasters, and who wish to inquire how it was spent, will be quickly and rather impolitely shown the exits. The Haitians greedily and gladly accept outside money. They don't however, like the idea of audits and transparency.

Welfare systems breed generational dependence. This is true intra- as well as inter- nation state. Haitians pine for outside help because that is all they know. The culture, the systems, the institutions, laws and civil life don't exist in Haiti. Voodoo idiocy, theft, violence, drugs, illiteracy, and a contempt for work and civilization do. Haiti is a self-created miserable entity, matching in ignorance, poverty and disease other uncivilized backwaters in the Islamic, African and Asia worlds. There is no neo-Marxist core-periphery theory to explain Haiti's pre-modern barbarity. Haiti was never 'exploited' and therein lies its problem. If the Haitians had been 'colonized' by the British, like Bahamas, Barbados, Hong Kong, India and Jamaica, than the Haitians would be extraordinarily better off. The Haitians have manufactured their own misery.

In light of the recent disaster the usual countries have responded. In per capita terms the Canadians have easily been the most generous with $130 million in monies thus given or $4 per person – the same aggregate total as the American. France and Britain, with 2 times the Canadian population have given only about $30 million each. Russia less than $1 million. Africa, Latin America and the Muslim world have given little or nothing. But of course this does not change the multi-cultural chorus that these pre-modern states with barbaric ideologies are still the 'superior' nations and cultures.

[http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2010/jan/14/haiti-quake-aid-pledges-country-donations]

One thing must be obvious. None of the money given to Haiti over the past 10 years has done a damn bit of good. The Haitians are welfare refugees, eagerly awaiting the next US army food bag, or the incoming chest of medicines from Canada. The entire Haitian society cannot create, build, innovate or do much of anything productive. The real Haitian economy of drugs, crime and theft, overshadows any purported modern economy and society. The reality is that Haiti, like all welfare cases and states, needs to be cut off from the money drug and let loose. Maybe then it will find rationality, independence and self-worth. Some $ 2 billion, just in 2010, will flow into the country. That is $220 per person. And that should be the final welfare cheque.

The Dumocrats. Party of the misbegotten. Look at their base.

The Republicans are not much better. But at least, elements friendly to and supportive of civilization exist in the Republican party. Not so with the Dumocrats. The Dums are a party divergent from reality, culture, the American ideals. It is the saddest collection of disaffected Marxists, socialists, and class based whiners in history – worst than many of the lower life forms in Europe, known as 'Social Democrats'. Without the protection of academia, the media and the unions, the Dumocrats would be a permanent and small minority party, on the fringes of the real world, gaping, grinning, and ludicrous.

Astounding than that a motley collection of utter vagrants and political opportunists obsessed with power, now run history's most important state – but portray themselves as 'fighting for the little man'. Nothing more removed from the truth could be concocted. The Dum party is about as concerned about the 'little man' as Islam is about peace; Feminists are about female rights; and abortionists are about human life. The Dums are a gross coterie of aspiring power mongers who put a nice pastiche and some lipstick on the virile swine of ambition.

The Dums are supported by some 40% of the electorate, who make it a family business, irregardless of reality, policy or circumstance to vote Dumocrat. Yet if you look at the supporters of the party, you can easily see that it is narrow, it is socialist, and it is urbanized:

-Unions which make up 15 % of the labor force, but about 25% of actual voters, vote 70% or more for the Dums.

-90-95 % of Blacks and Jews which together comprise 20% of the population.

-80% of Hispanics [and many illegals who vote], support the Dums.

-80 % of those 18-29 [the College airheads as they are called] comprising about 20% of the voters.

-60 % or more of the Ivy League Technocratic elite will vote as Dums.

-Over 80% of the news media and Hollywood votes Dumocrat.

-Lawyers and higher income professionals tend to vote Dum.

The current Dumocrat party is thus a curious amalgam. It has three basic components: 1) Racialism with Blacks, Hispanics and Jews; 2) Union money and workers; and 3) Higher income, and in some cases higher educated elites, with a technocratic view of life. The Dums thus have a dichotomy of interests to please which they do with a simple world vision: a society of socialist governance; socialist control; managed by 'benign' highly educated paternalists, all embedded in the 'kinder', 'sophisticated' Dumocrat party. This view – that man is a communal and not an individualist animal – appeals to their rather diverse set of core interest groups. It satisfies all of the natural, power and money lusts of their 3 key bases of support. It is of course extraordinarily corrupt, deceitful and self-serving.

George Soros, a billionaire money manager and actor prima inter pares in Dum party financing, is the exemplar of the dark arts of Dum political machinations. Soros is an illiterate, self taught financier with pretensions to managing society into some European styled socialist nirvana. Via his moveon.org, and other groups, Soros is the animating light behind much of the financing of radical left-wing groups in the US. Yet the media and journalists ignore Soros – like they do the union support of Obama, or the Black Jesus' ACORN work and political connections – fearful one supposes of the man's power and reach. And Soros is just one of many rich socialists from Wall Street, which of course gave the Black Jesus and friends $40 million just in 2008, who use the Dum party to reshape America into the craven image of Russian Socialism.

Besides the money-class, the real base of the Dums are the unions. Some $150 million from unions went to the Prophet Obamed's campaign victory in the last election cycle. Without this money there would be no Dumocratic Party. Without union workers, volunteers, endless propaganda and funding, there would be no Prophet Obamed. Unions take money from their members and fund Dum politicians, buying their political interests and using Dum puppets to pass union friendly legislation. The unions pimp for the Dums and the Dums are only too happy to prostitute themselves for the unions:

“The result is a money-laundering operation in which leftwing politicians appropriate money for themselves, using friendly labor unions as the middle-men intermediaries who expropriate it from workers. Nearly 40 percent of union workers today are registered Republicans, but a sizable chunk of their wages is taken and used to elect Democrats.

This union money is the mother’s milk of the Democratic Party. If these millions in union campaign contributions vanished tomorrow, most Democratic officeholders would be bankrupt overnight, and the Democratic Party would immediately shrink to permanent minority status.” http://97.74.65.51/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=12216

How true. If the SIEU under Stern did not exist, there would be no Prophet Obamed. It is not an exaggeration to state that the SIEU is running the White House – along with Wall Street.

Another important plank in the Dum platform is race. Mindless Dum politicians constantly reference race.

The Prophet is Black and if you vote against him you are a racist.

If you don't like socialized health care you are a White supremacist who wishes to see Blacks die on the streets.

If you don't approve unfettered illegal immigration you hate Mexicans.

If you don't wish to have the US economy unionized you are biased against poorer non-White skinned folks.

If you don't support expansive government and free medical/social care for illegals you are a racist White southerner and KKK supporter.

It was the Dum party of course who instituted the KKK – as a civil military reaction against the Republican Northern government post bellum, who engaged in southern 'reconstruction' elevating Blacks in many cases to positions of power within southern society. A historical fact that most in the media and the Dum party would not know.

The socialization of US health care is to buy off the unions of course. The US health care system can accommodate millions of union workers. These workers will vote and support the Dums. Get the picture ? The same is true of Hispanic immigration. The Dums can buy off the Hispanics with the welfare state. The Hispanics will work and send money to the Dums. The cycle will escalate, continue and intensify. Not hard to see where it all leads to.

The curious fact about US politics is that the US media and educational system portrays the Dums as enlightened custodians of reason and compassion. It is utter bunk. Look at their support base. Unions, racialism, lawyers, and Wall Street. Hardly a menagerie of disaffected, Platonic guardians, emotionally committed to moral custodianship. The Dum party is nothing more than an organized ancient Roman mob, led by a technocracy with designs at creating a Brave New World. One that has been tried many times and has failed. Which is why one supposes the media and the academe are so in love with the Dum party.

Article Review. Raymond Ibrahim: Muslim Taqiya or Deceit.

Ideology not the individual counts. Lots of Germans were Nazis and not too keen on killing Jews. But it happened. Many Russians during Stalin's reign were indifferent about invading or controlling through proxies large parts of the world. But it happened. Many Muslims don't support Islamic Fascism and terror. But it still goes on. Perhaps most Arabs and Muslims do not countenance Taqiya or lying to the infidel to further Islamic aspirations. But it happens and this is a vital part of Muslim expansionism.

Ibrahim's critique of Taqiya or Deceit – is a must read [http://tool.donation-net.net/Images/Email/1097/Taqiyya_and_Islam_s_rules_of_war.pdf]. It is the best organized and lucid expostulation of Muslim perfidy and immorality. Lie to spread Islam. Deceive to break the infidel. Break contracts and agreements if it benefits Muslim objectives. Taqiya is a direct offspring of pagan Arab culture. It comes out of the Arab ethos that any action taken against the 'enemy' and which helps you achieve your objectives is valid. Morality, contracts, social norms can all be ignored and damned.

Taqiya is premised on the ideals of the 5.000 year old Arab moon cult and its associated deformed culture and attitudes. It just reinforces how old, how pagan, and how utterly pre-modern Islam is.

One can summarize the main ideas of Ibrahim's historically valid analysis with the following points – but I would urge people to read the 12 page article in its entirety:

1. Sunni doctrine makes Taqiya acceptable and mandatory when waging jihad or war against the infidel.
2. The Shia doctrine of Taqiya being 'fear' of persecution and lying to prevent such persecution has been supplanted by the Sunni ideal of using Taqiya to spread Islam. [Most of the Muslim world some 80%, is Sunni].
3. Deceit in Islamic theory and practice is often elevated to be better than military virtue or courage.
4. The Koran adjures the use of deceit towards non-Muslims [3:28, 3:54, 8:30, 10:21, for example).
5. Mohammed's ruthless, murderous career was full of Taqiya, the breaking of contracts, agreements, peace treaties and accords. As Mohammed said in one battle, 'For war is deceit.' He famously broke many treaties in his bloodthirsty expansion of his family's cult and his moon cult ideology.
6. The Koran and Islamic scholarly writing make it clear that Taqiya is a part of war; and since Islam must either subjugate or exterminate non-believers through jihad, Taqiya as deception is mandatory.
7. The Koran and Islamic writing make it clear that Muslims can break agreements if they 'feel' that the infidel are about to abrogate their contract. No proof of this is needed. Just the 'feeling' that the non-believer is 'up to something'. A pre-emptive attack and breakage of the treaty is thus permitted.
8. The Muslim world-view of the House of Islam at perpetual war with the Infidel, makes Taqiya in practice totally acceptable. This endless war will only end when the world is Islamic.

As Ibrahim states the implications of Taqiya in the real world are clear: “Yet most Westerners continue to think that Muslim mores, laws, and ethical constraints are near identical to those of the Judeo-Christian tradition. Naively or arrogantly, today's multiculturalist leaders project their own worldview onto Islamists....Right and wrong in Islam have little to do with universal standards....”

Nicely put. The Arab inspired pagan Fascism of Islam and the Koran are completely different than Western culture. These two world views share nothing in common. Islam is a universal will to power ideology with Orientalist, pagan pretensions. It is thus very similar in many respects to Nazism and Communism, modern European Fascisms which had designs to eradicate the modern world, freedom, individuality and return to the dark ages of cult control, communalism, and ritualized pagan practices.

The mistake that many people make is that they equate Islam with Christianity believing the Muslim lie that Allah is the same as the Jewish Yaweh or the Christian Father. Allah is ali-ilah or the male moon deity of Mecca. It is a 5.000 year old pagan object, worshiped by Arabs as part of a generalized and quite vast array of moon deities. Mohammed's 'invention' was to try and convince Jews and Christians that their God was the Arab moon deity and vice-versa.

The fact that Mohammed failed to argue his case persuasively to attract the 'unbelievers' to his program, resorting instead to 80 odd military campaigns which included, theft, rape, enslavement, murder, castration, and thousands of dead – not to mention deceit – should be enough to dissuade any modern do-gooder, that Islam is even remotely similar to the teachings of Christ, Moses, Maimonides, Bernhard, or Erasmus. Islam has precious little in connection with Judeo-Christianity. Not matter how hard academics, multi-cult blowhards, Marxist Leftards, or 'experts' try, the real world black and white fact is that Islam is diametrically opposed and the opposite of the foundations of Western culture.

Taqiya or lying, is just another example of this reality.

Book Review: 'Churchill at War 1940-45', 2009, by Lord Moran.

Lord Moran was Churchill's doctor during World War II. He probably saved Churchill's life on a few occasions. His diary was published after the war, and was recently re-edited and re-released. It is not one of my favorite Churchilliana pieces. Contrary to what critics maintain I don't find it particularly well-written, eloquent or well organized. In fact its disjointed nature – it is almost a direct translation and rework from a diary of scrap paper – makes it a difficult read. However, there are some interesting insights into Churchill which do warrant mention.

Moran's book does contain quite a few interesting insights. The following are examples.

Churchill's Personality:

“Winston is so taken up with his own ideas that he is not interested in what other people think....and must often be lonely, cut off from people.” [p. 124]

Note: Entirely true. Stubborn, passionate, emotional and rhetorical. A difficult debating partner indeed.

“But when he came to select men he was somehow less successful – the incipient genius rescued from obscurity was apt to prove a disappointment.” [p. 129]

Note: A valid and intelligent observation. Winston was a bad buyer. But a great seller.

“What his critics are apt to forget is that you can't measure inspiration.....the strength of will that has bent all manner of men to his purpose; the extraordinary tenacity....the terrific force of personality that can brush aside all doubts and hesitations, and sweep away inertia...” [p. 132]

Note: Eloquent and precisely stated.

“Without that feeling for words he might have made little enough of life. For in judgement, in skill in administration, in knowledge of human nature, he does not at all excel.”[p. 149]

Note: Would disagree about Churchill's administration skills which were first class. No one in British history has moved the machinery of government with more alacrity and profit than Churchill. The rest is right enough.

At war:

America comes into the war post-Pearl Harbor: “And now suddenly the war is as good as won and England is safe; to be Prime Minister in a great war; to be able to direct the Cabinet, the Army.....England herself, is beyond even his dreams. He loves every minute of it.” [p.9]

Note: He knew the job and what it would take to win the war. Churchill's emotionalism and energy to do what was needed were chief amongst his strengths.

“Mr. Churchill was as sure that only by the premature invasion of France could the war be lost. To postpone that evil day, all his arts, all his eloquence, all his great experience were spent.” [p. 39]

Note: Churchill's greatest 'victory' post 1940 was to delay the largest amphibious invasion in history until a preponderance of men, logistics, supply, training and intelligence would ensure success.

“He himself has told us that in September, 1942, his position was more vulnerable than at any other period in the war. After El Alamein, he was never again in danger of losing his job...” [p. 93]

Note: If Churchill had lost this battle, he would most likely have lost a vote of confidence in the Commons and forced to resign.

“It seems that no one could stand up to him, either in the Cabinet or in the House of Commons. Once he had made up his mind nobody could make him change it.” [p. 221]

Note: Post-Alamein, his political position was never in danger.

Mistakes made:

“The PM believe that it is difficult to exaggerate the benefits to the Allies if Turkey comes into the war: he knows that this alone can delay a second front in France.” [p.179]

Note: I have no idea why Churchill was so fixated on Turkey. A hang over from World War One perhaps. Wrongheaded.

“Was the war in Italy a fiasco, as General Fuller thought, or was it a missed opportunity, a second Gallipoli?” [p. 213]

Note: The war in Italy was unnecessary once the southern parts of Italy were secured including Sicily which guaranteed the Allied control of the Mediterranean sea lanes. More profitable uses of the mass of men and material could have been used elsewhere.

Morgenthau's insidious plan to de-industrialize Germany and turn it into an agricultural country. “Later I bluntly saddled the Prof. [Lord Cherwell, Churchill's scientific 'adviser'], with the responsibility for this particular decision [Winston signing this rather insane declaration]. I asked him how he had managed to make the PM sign the plan.....'I explained to Winston, he said, that the plan would save Britain from bankruptcy by eliminating a dangerous competitor.'” [p.218]

Note: Pastoralizing Germany was not only immoral, but incomprehensible in the face of the obvious future Communist threat.

“...he did confide to me, not, however, without many qualifications, that he had been wrong about India.” [p. 223]

Note: Indian independence was inevitable. Churchill was right on two issues; the first being the bloody civil war between Muslims and Hindus which killed some 10 million; and the second being the hasty exit which disregarded, political, social and economic reality and induced chaos.

“[the United Nations].....is the only hope of the world.” [p. 227]

Note: I call the UN, Churchill's folly, and his greatest mistake ever in his career. There is no argument against this assertion. The UN was a fantasy, and it does much to discredit Winston's 'realism' in assessing the value of international organisations in an anarchic and self-interested world. A real blind spot.

Russia:

Stalin admitting to Churchill of the mass murders of Soviet agricultural land owners and workers:
“Worse. Much worse. It went on for years. Most of them liquidated by the peasants who hated them [note; this is of course a lie it was the Red Army]. Ten millions of them [note; closer to 15 million]. But we had to do it to mechanize our agriculture. In the end, production from the land was doubled [note; another lie, Soviet production collapsed causing famines, food was imported from the West]. What in one generation ? Stalin demanded...” [p. 76]

Note: Churchill was certainly aware of Soviet barbarism. It is unlikely that he viewed the Soviet system as anything other than an expression of evil. The contrast with Roosevelt, who trusted the Russians, is astounding.

August 21, 1944: “He dreams of the Red Army spreading like a cancer from one country to another. It has become an obsession, and he seems to think of little else.” [p. 211]

Note: He had the same fears in 1919 and 1920 during the height of the Soviet civil war.

“Winston told me that he had found he could talk to Stalin as one human being to another. Stalin, he was sure, would be sensible.” [p. 233]

Note: Winston invented the idea of summits, where 'great men' would parlay and solve their differences. His inadequate appraisal of Stalin's psychotic personality deluded him into thinking that he could make deals with the dictator. Though in his favor, such a deal did save Greece from Communist occupation – but only after the British put boots on the ground during 1944 and 45.

These points illustrate that Moran is a keen observer and faithful recorder. He recorded what he saw and did not invent what he wanted to see or hear. Some of his observations are controversial. Almost all are valid and historically accurate, affirmed by other observers and historians.

The main value as I see it from Moran's work, is his illustrations of personalities, their interactions and his musings about people and who and what they really are. It is a doctor's diary after all and one would expect a certain amount of psychological investigation into men living during one of history's most important periods. One passage did catch my attention about Churchill's faith: “He showed me a quotation from the 112th Psalm....'He shall not be afraid of evil tidings: his heart is fixed, trusting in the Lord.' [p.13]

Churchill was never a religious man. But I do remember reading from his works and autobiographers, that during the war, he found comfort in knowing that a great spiritual force would not allow evil to conquer good. With a champion like Churchill, a God – if one does exist – could have found no better weapon to defend Christian and European civilization.

The embarassment of being Dutch. Geert Wilders being tried for 'hate' againt the Moon Cult.

The Dutch collaborated almost en masse with the Germans during the Nazi occupation in some form. The most nefarious manner was to sell out Jews – even mixed blood Jews – to the occupiers in exchange for money or food. Heroic wasn't it ? Now we have the Dutch elite selling out the only politician left-standing in Europe who will defend European civilization. Wilders' hate crime ? Speaking out against Islamic theology, Fascism, violence, and the destruction of European culture. Instead of being listened to, applauded and supported, he is now being trundled off by the progeny of German collaboration to stand trial on January 20th 2010. The cowering, moronic, midgets have spoken. It must surely be an embarrassment being Dutch.

Wilders' criticizes not Muslims but Islam. Wilders is critical of the theology, not the individual. The main crime that the Euro-Dutch elite want to prosecute is the revolting idea that a 'religion' cannot be criticized – unless it is Judaism or Christianity of course. Thus we again have the idioicies of the state, the purblind, ignorant and illiterate bureaucrats deciding what can, or cannot be stated in public. This is a horrific crime against common sense, morality and legal tradition. Without free speech, there is no freedom – as the once Nazi occupied Dutch should understand better than most.

The website http://defendgeertwilders.wordpress.com/ sums up the Neo-Fascist Dutch government's lynching [rather ironic isn't it] of a man defending Dutch culture:

“The Court of Appeal determined that statements equating Islam to Nazism were a punishable insult to Islamic worshippers and therefore constituted ground for criminal prosecution. The Court of Appeal did not convict Mr. Wilders of a crime, but ordered the Public Prosecutor to start a criminal procedure against him before the District Court of Amsterdam.

On January 13th, the District Court in Amsterdam dismissed a motion made by Mr. Wilders to limit the charges against him. The Court ruled that the indictment was in line with the decision of the Court of Appeal and that there were no new facts that would give reason to limit the scope of the indictment. On January 20th, the District Court in Amsterdam will start the proceedings in the case. Ultimately, it will decide whether or not Mr Wilders has committed a criminal offense."

There are obvious problems with the Government's claim.

First, why is Islam a religion ? Because we are told it is ? Why isn't it classified as a cult like Scientology ? How can an ignormasus indoctrinated by politically correct Fascism, possibly prosecute me, Wilders or anyone else who argues quite coherently that Islam is NOT a religion ? Surely in the Wilders' case, the super-intelligent bureaucrats will have to defend their thesis that Islam is a religion – even though it isn't.

Second, as I and others have extensively proven, Islam is entirely compatible with Nazism. It is racist, supremacist, anti-Semitic, universal and its Mein Kampf or Koran is little more than a litany of hate, war, jihad and calls to world domination. Like Nazism, it is against civilisation, the separation of church and state; freedom; free speech and is violent, anti-modern and viciously bloodthirsty. So yes, Geert is right, Islam is just another pagan Fascism.

Third, neither the court, nor the politicians trying Wilders have any knowledge of the topic. None of them have read the Koran I would expect. None of them know anything about Arab-Muslim history, the story of Islamic jihad or the 1400 year onslaught against the world perpetrated by the Meccan moon cult. None of them understand the history of Mohammed, the blood-soaked and Fascistic origins of Islam, nor the mere fact that ali-ilah or Allah is the 5.000 year old male moon deity of Mecca. Why then does someone like Wilders, who has vastly more knowledge than the Dutch inquisition, have to meet with a collection of monkeys whose ignorance is supposedly buttressed by European law ?

Fourth, the little, trite idea of freedom. The EU Constitution is fantastically absurd in many respects but one of its more obvious psych-somatic features is this: the EU affirms the right of assembly and speech BUT, it cannot affect 'social peace' or offend 'religions'. Thus the state can determine what is free or not free speech. So Muslims can read hate literature from the Koran and not be prosecuted. But someone like Wilders who sees the cultural, intellectual, economic and spiritual decline of Holland, ravaged by the moon cult of Mecca, cannot offer criticism ?

In effect the Dutch court trying Wilders is actually in contempt of EU and International law. Even that most useless body, the United Nations affirms, in principle the right to speak freely and openly:

Now, Therefore THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY proclaims THIS UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations, to the end that every individual and every organ of society, keeping this Declaration constantly in mind, shall strive by teaching and education to promote respect for these rights and freedoms and by progressive measures, national and international, to secure their universal and effective recognition and observance, both among the peoples of Member States themselves and among the peoples of territories under their jurisdiction..

Article 19: Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.” http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/

The Euro-weenies are thus in contravention of EU free speech laws and their coveted UN's own declaration supporting the same.

In any event what madness possesses the EU technocracy, and the craven Dutch, to spend millions of tax dollars prosecuting someone who is defending Europe ? Can someone please explain the psychopathy behind this ? Free speech is mandatory for freedom. The Dutch suffered under Nazism – a European form of the Arabian moon cult's Fascistic pretensions – and know full well that totalitarian destruction is premised on fear, no free speech and no free assembly. Do the Dutch elite really believe that Islam is a moderate, tolerant form of Fascism ? Do these capering baboons really expect Muslims to 'love the Dutch' once the Inquisition crucifies Wilders, sacrificed to the Multi-cult; and Islamic ambitions ? Can they argue coherently against Wilders' arguments, or is the use of state power, and the crushing of dissent the Euro way ?

Inquisitions played a remarkable role in the downfall of Imperial Spain. When the elite of a state starts the selective, immoral and two-faced prosecution of its most remarkable, productive, outspoken or literate of citizens, the end result is not hard to predict. The Euro media scoffs at the “Islamophobes” who predict Eurabia and the end of Europe. Wilders' court prosecution is a travesty and only serves to support the thesis that Europe is finished. An immoral, illegal and utterly vapid attack on a courageous man by the Dutch and Euro-elite.

Fascist losers one and all. Appeasing the moon cult won't avert your destiny. Good riddance Europe.

========================================================================

At the following link, you will find a list of all Dutch embassies and consulates abroad. Send an email about free speech to these losers:

http://www.embassiesabroad.com/embassies-of/Netherlands#668

We abhor the decision of the Dutch Government and Justice Minister E.M.H. Hirsch Ballin to prosecute the Hon Geert Wilders for hate speech on January 20 2010.

We note that Holland has always been a staunch ally of the West in its protection of Free Speech. Now however, it seems that the old traditions have been abolished.

Millions across the free world will be watching with great concern to see whether or not the Dutch Government still stands for liberty and still stands with their allies.

We urge the Government to immediately drop all charges and FREE GEERT WILDERS

Thank you in advance for your assistance and contribution in this important and worthy cause!

========================================================================

Haiti needs US invervention and paternalism.

The failed state of Haiti has received more than $2 billion in aid in the past 6 years. All of it for non-emergency, non-disaster relief. The 2004 hurricane disaster pulled in well over a $1 billion and the recent 2010 catastrophe will do likewise. But here is a question. When does the Haitian funding/foreign aid scam end ? A small country of 9 million people squeezed in on a 60 km wide piece of real estate abutting the Dominican Republic has received in per capita terms, some $440 per person just in the last 6 years. This is remarkable both in size, fraud, corruption and immorality. Excuse my callousness, but where the hell is this money going to ? Why are the taps not turned off ? When is a failed state like Haiti forced into paternalistic reform ?

Foreign aid never works. Africa, with the pop-idiots, movie-stars and media celebrities all declaring their 'African commitment' has consumed $ 2 Trillion in the past 40 years generating a return of exactly zero, replete with war, disease, genocide, Arab decimation of Blacks in Darfur, legendary corruption and now the exportation of radical Islam from various failed states. For $ 2 Trillion private agencies could have gone into Africa and built systems of sewage, sanitation, water potability and schooling – and still had money left over.

But of course in the era of strong man rule – the Great Black Jesus in the USA, Putin or Mr. Travels in Russia, Chavez the strutting midget in Venezuela etc. -- it is government which has to do everything. Even a purportedly 'private' charity like the Red Cross, which is the largest in the world, receives government funding for almost all of its outlays for shelters, homes, disaster aid, and food relief. Not a bad business model. Receive private donations and get your expenses paid by the government. Then declare that you are a not for profit. Pay your executives close to a million dollars a year in salary. Yep no profit here.

Aid agencies love disasters. Their revenues soar. Their 'admin costs' expand. And their concern conflates. Yet what happens will all of this private and government sponsored charity ? How many pennies on the dollar reach the victims ? Is it 10% of total monies which actually find their way to help the disaster's victims ? 20%, 30 %, 2 % ? It can't be that large. The Red Cross for example earns $3 billion in revenues per year and books at least 10% of that into 'disaster funds' which is of course how it hides its profits. Certainly only a small fraction of all the money given by you to the Red Cross, or by governments to Haiti, will actually end up helping Haitians.

So where does all this money go ?

According to the US Government, the US has given Haiti almost a billion dollars in the past 6 years. Almost a billion more from other sources was pledged before the latest disaster – or $ 2 billion in total:

“Apart from earthquake relief, senators working on the next annual foreign assistance budget have proposed at least $282 million for Haiti; the House proposal would provide at least $165 million.

Much of the U.S. government's aid to Haiti comes through the Agency for International Development, which has provided at least $800 million from budget years 2004 through 2008, agency figures show.

At least $700 million more was pledged to Haiti by governments, international givers and charities at an April 2009 donors conference. Former President Bill Clinton, a United Nations special envoy to the country, told the U.N. Security Council in September that he was "100 percent committed to delivering tangible results to the U.N. and most importantly the people of Haiti."

The 2004 hurricane destruction and other disasters have received hundreds of millions if not billions in aid as well. So let's see. We have some $4 billion being given to Haiti over say 5-6 years. There are 9 million people in this small land. That equates to over $400 per person. So where are the audits on this massive transfer of wealth ? Where are audited lists of the earthquake proof buildings, the vast array of shock-proof medical clinics, and where are the emergency relief teams and depots of stocked food, medicine, bedding and emergency material ? This is not the first time Haiti has experienced a natural disaster. So where are all of the assets which we paid for ? No where of course.

The simple answer is that the money is being corrupted and stolen. Very little of the $400 per capita transfer has found any uses whatsoever inside Haiti – except to populate the overseas bank accounts of its ruling mafia. Haiti is in other words, just another example of a failed state, living on the world's welfare system. A culture of voodoo, black magic, lethargy, no creativity and no education, a state which is so poor, anti-modern and anti-reality that death rates, diseases and illiteracy, which were unknown in North American even 150 years ago, still dominate. Haiti is a self-inflicted, self-corrupted, disgusting, immoral, anti-humanist, anti-reality mess.

So where is all this money going ? It is lost.

“Corruption, theft, violence and other security problems and Haiti's sheer shortage of fundamentals - reliable roads, telephone and power lines and a sound financial system - will add to the challenges of making sure aid is spent properly as foreign governments and charities try not only to help Haiti recover from this week's devastating earthquake but to pull itself out of abject poverty.

Past efforts haven't been easy. The Government Accountability Office, the investigative arm of Congress, faced problems on a smaller scale in 2005 and 2006 as auditors tried to review the use of roughly $45 million in aid the U.S. provided after Tropical Storm Jeanne struck Haiti in September 2004, killing more than 2,000 people, injuring more than 2,600 and affecting an estimated 300,000 others.

The inspectors wanted to visit projects funded with the money to measure progress. But after an initial fact-finding trip to Haiti, it was considered too dangerous for them to go back.” http://www.wqow.com/Global/story.asp?S=11827340

So when do you cut them off ? Or do you weep hysterically and lament neo-imperialism, white racism, and the blight of white culture ? Keep in mind that it is the whites, the American military, the French forces, the English do-gooder charities and the international white dominated churches which are the first responders to a catastrophe. It is also the Western states who have given the Haitians $4 billion over 6 years. Not the Muslims, not the Arabs, not the Latins and not the Africans. Only Western states give on this scale.

The only hope for Haiti is a military intervention by the US and forced paternalism. The only way to cleanse the sewer which is Haiti is by US imperialism. Eradicate the rot and fraud; enable laws and institutions to develop; and re-orient the culture from voodoo mysticism to rationality, spirituality, education and markets. That is it. No other solution exists. The Haitians won't do it – especially if you keep the welfare water taps on. Turn the taps off. Force the Haitians to join reality via US paternalistic guidance.

It is their only hope.

Stock Fraud – ride the wave, but get out sooner, rather than later.

It is no secret if you read the history of 'bubbles' what is the prime moving agent of the economic dislocation. It has always been government. Even Bernie Madoff who stole $13 billion [quite a sum], was financed in large part by easy government leveraging and monetary policy. Zero interest rates, margin accounts, loans of all varieties, houses acting as ATMs – all of this gave Madoff's victims ample access to ready cash and credit. If rates are negative why not invest in the markets ? Sure beats savings rates, bonds, Treasury debt and boring CD notes, all of which pay nothing. Madoff is in jail – why not the politicians and moron-ocrats who are perpetrating the public fraud which is leveraged market levitation ?

If you scam someone privately and are caught you go to jail. But if you do it publicly you don't. So L Ron Gore the eco-whore can fatten himself on tax monies and subsidies for his 'green' energy firms, or carbon trading frauds, can steal public money via his political contacts, and nothing happens. No jail time. Globaloney Warming quacks, parading as scientists, can earn millions in tax dollars for their lies posturing as 'science' and nothing happens. No jail time. Politicians and bureaucrats can spend money, bribe, take money, increase the debt, flood the system with money, incur massive future inflation and bankrupt the state but nothing happens. No jail time.

Justice ? Surely you jest.

If you steal, cheat, lie, or distort and you are a public official, not much will happen to you. As a lying craven and ignorant politician you can generate the entire bankruptcy of a state, and detonate the earnings, wealth and lives of those at your mercy, and you will not be punished. In fact the media will declare you compassionate [all those caring programs for the children's future and health care !]; progressive [but yes you are following the effete homosexual Keynes and you do love the people !]; intellectual [but my you did study at Harvard and talk in sound bites !]; and deeply concerned [see Ted Kennedy's funeral as an example of panegyric lies and propaganda about a corrupt family patriarch whose wealth came from illegal business and mafia relations.]

Politicians and bureaucrats should be in jail for the scam, frauds, and ponzi schemes they manufacture, including the current economic crisis, which has only started. How much wealth will be lost from this latest bubble, set of lies, and government inspired leveraged speculation ? How many jobs are permanently gone and how many futures are now impaired due to the colossal disaster visited upon people around the world, caused by the corruption, the greed and the incompetence of government ?

The current stock market rally is nothing more than the usual government inspired leveraged credit bubble. Get out now before the next downturn which will happen. All parties end with hangovers – this will be no different.

With zero interest rates there is no alternative but to buy stocks. No other vehicle exists to make money. With easy credit, Wall Street can use Federal Reserve money to trade, push up equity prices and 'declare a profit'. This induces funds to reinvest in the market and propels retail investors to partake in the market upsurge. Yet it is clear that the nexus of corruption between Wall Street and Washington is so obvious, entwined and mired in stench, that it is a wonder that Wall Street is not physically relocated to K Street in Washington. After all Wall Street did give the Black Jesus – the most important man or god in history - $40 million in funding in the last year of the election cycle. Irregardless of the Prophet's bank-bashing rhetoric [done only to appease populist revulsion against Wall Street]; the big Finance houses and the Democratic party are married. Until death do they part. Or maybe until the next economic collapse do they part. As one blogger following the scent of corruption so nicely put it:

“The symbiotic bond between our government and Wall Street is so tightly woven, that people go in and out of Wall Street and public sector jobs as if it were a revolving door. This is our new form of government and at the core is the corporatocracy. A government bought by Wall Street and for Wall Street. The interest of the people only comes into question if there is money left over after bonuses.”http://tinyurl.com/yllr925

True enough. The Treasury Department is run by ex-Golden Slacks and Citi-Group directors. The relationship between Wall Street and the Treasury is so tight, it is impossible to differentiate between the two. Both have the same interests, the same self-serving hypocrisy and the same game plan at work. They are married.

The leveraged inspired market bubble currently in train will collapse. Gold, commodities and oil are certain to rise as the US dollar plummets and American bankruptcy – including states like California – becomes more obvious. If you have made some money think of exiting before the crash starts. Taking profits is never a bad idea, especially when all of the true economic signals, are clear that the real economy has nothing in common with the Wall Street-Big Government economy.

The main lesson from the past 10 years of government created bubbles is this: if you want to steal, lie, cheat, take bribes and engage in corruption – be a public official. You won't go to jail.

Government created stock fraud.

Stock markets generate the best returns. There is no disputing this fact. But the caveat is, you have to know what you are doing and manage your own money. If you listen to 'experts', 'brokers' and bankers you will lose your money. None of these people – none – predicted the current economic meltdown. None of them – none – have a clue about what is going to happen in the near term. As a person who sold out before the collapse in the fall of 2008; shorted the market until February 2009; and then bought into banks and technology in February, March and April, I feel far more qualified than the professionals in analyzing macro-market trends. And the omens look ugly.

It is not invigorating to be a pessimist. Optimism is more suited to moving ahead in life. But reality is not a Prophet Obamed speech full of lies and vapidity. Nor is it an Oprah and Friends scam where the charlatans sell you quack psychology and Dr. Phil's pablum snake oil – all to make you the superstar that you should be. If you sold out in August 2008 and than shorted the market for a while, you would have made a huge return. But who told you to do that ? CNBC ? Cramer ? Kudlow ? The NY Times ? Barrons ? No one did. The good times, based on a historically unparalleled expansion in credit, debt and leverage derivatives of every variety would last forever. So most of the mainstream, Neo-Keynesian, and straight laced monetarists told you.

The market was overbought at its height of Dow 14000. Price earnings were in the 20-21 range – 30% higher than they should have been. The leverage fiasco had existed since 2002 for anyone willing to see reality. Sub-prime loans; speculation; negative interest rates; M3 money supply expansion; and bank leverage ratios of some 30-95: 1 ! [Fred and Fan were levered at close to 100 to 1]. All of this liquidity and debt leveraging made a stock market collapse inevitable. The same scenario had happened of course, during the 1920s. Leverage cycles create asset bubbles. As the bubble unfolds greed and speculation rush in leading to leveraged risk-taking and greed; which inevitably bids up prices to some level that becomes unsustainable. Anyone looking at real estate from 2000 to 2007 and who noticed that the 50 year average return of 3-4% before inflation was now suddenly 10% or better, knew it was a bubble.

But few in the mainstream media bothered to tell you. They were beating on the drums that you had to buy condos in Miami, Dubai, and trot off to Arizona or Las Vegas and buy land. If not you were not cool, hip and in tune with how to get wealthy in America.

So now the story is what ? The stock market has 'recovered' and this year will see returns of 10%. GDP growth [a fraudulent number], will be 4% this year. Unemployment thanks to the Black Jesus' insidious 'stimulus' of $5 million per new job [all 10.000 of them perhaps], will decline. The media will hail the Obamed's as geniuses. Neo-Keynesians will wail that the occult theories of the homosexual Keynes are once again the only possible policy reaction when an economy craters, thanks to government incompetence, fiscal irresponsibility, debt accumulation, state program bankruptcy [see Medicaid and Medicare]; and housing finance manipulation by politicians and state departments like the HUD, CRA and Fran and Freddie. Yep. Government 'solving' the crisis which government created. The talk of madmen.

These are the reasons – all of them ephemeral – as to why the stock market is up this year:

* Funds are chasing returns;
* Interest rates are at zero so the only place to make money is in equities
* No one with an ounce of rationality wants to own US Treasury Debt since America is going bankrupt
* The Fed Reserve is liquidating Wall Street allowing investment banks to use Government printed paper to buy equities to hold up the markets.

The whole market is held up by Hiero-like inventions of sophistry, manipulation and visual distortions. Much like a statue or a machine from the first century AD's master mechanic and inventor, the current market is being held up in front of its audience by devices, wires and magnets that are impossible for the average person to see. Take away these false supports and the statues and the machines – along with this market – comes crashing down.

Interest rates have to go up.

The money in this long term bear market rally has been made.

The US dollar is doomed and funds are turning to cash, gold, silver and commodities.

Economic growth is a lie – GDP which rewards spending but does not take into account debt – has no real relevance for how the real world economy is functioning. And that economy is still in a lot of trouble [you don't blow through a 30 year created bubble in 1-2 years and recover all those 'bubble' jobs].

One economist/broker blogger wrote an article on why he thought 2010 would be a great year for stocks. The usual forest for the tree detail premised on some arcane and abstract theory. Much to his amazement he received the following, caustic and entirely valid reply about the fraudulent nature of the current stock rally:

“The comment I received is worth discussing since it reflects a belief that is widely held today concerning the financial markets. He writes, “The stock market is artificially propped up through government purchases of Dow stocks with tax money deposited in broker accounts at such money centers as Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase, among others. They can levitate the markets indefinitely with Fed Reserve account funds. The U.S. stock market is a fraud. Surely you must understand that.” http://www.financialsense.com/editorials/droke/2010/0111.html

The sceptic is entirely right. Golden Slacks and friends are trading on the Fed Reserve trillions pushing up stock prices, and turning profits on trading. The stock market is thus not an indicator of the overall economy, but simply an indicator of the nexus of corruption between Wall Street and Washington. The market is a scam. At some point the real world will have to physically pick up Wall Street and lift it out of New York and put it down near Capitol Hill in Washington. That is where the rigged and manipulated fraud belongs.

Book Review: Vox Day 'Return of the Great Depression'.

Vox Day is a published columnist and economist who predicted in 2002 that the credit expansion bubble would end in a recession. Thus unlike most mainstream economists, media hacks, and chattering TV teeth, he has credibility. Day believes that the current economic contraction is far from over and he marshals a lot of historical and current data to support his claim. As an antidote to the CNBC-Business and Financial news complex, Day is well worth reading. At least you will learn a lot from his views – none of which you will find in the mainstream media or the mostly useless forum called a newspaper.

Day operates the popular blog voxpopuli at http://voxday.blogspot.com/ dedicated to economic affairs. Besides leading a punk rock band, Day could be classified as a member of the rationalist Austrian school of economics and a supporter of true laissez-faire economic exchange. This would put him in the distinct minority of economic pundits, directly opposed to the mainstream's Neo-Keynesian view of the virtues of big government, statistical manipulation, deceit and the wonderful 'multiplier' effects which exist from government spending debt, printed money or tax money.

Day's arguments that another Great Depression might be in the offing are premised on the following:

-Today's total US debt is almost double that of the 1930s, at over 350% [vs. 200%]. This does not include of course the debt overhang from the welfare state and 'unfunded liabilities', which total at least $100 Trillion in the next 15 years. In the 1930s the welfare state was just being created and government only owned 10% of GDP. Today it is 45 %.

-Negative interest rates and the expansion of the M2 and M3 money supply, far in excess of what economic, population or demand growth would stipulate, ensures high future inflation; perhaps even hyper-inflation.

-The US central bank or Fed Reserve has been a disaster since its creation in 1913. Inflation stands at an accumulated 2000% total, and the US currency has lost 95% of its value in 70 years. The Fed Reserve is entirely politicized and has no credibility in fighting inflation or maintaining the value of the dollar.

-All government statistics including GDP, consumer inflation and unemployment are worthless. Their very methodologies are subjective and open to rework and political interference. Day believes that actual US economic growth during the past 10 years was flat or negative once real inflation is factored in [the government leaves out food, fuel, energy and housing costs in calculating inflation].

-The GDP number is a scam. As Day points out it is basically a spending algorithm. Since GDP is Government Spending + Consumer spending + Net Investments + (Exports minus Imports); you can have the insane situation of completely stopping all imports and reporting a huge GDP increase ! If all imports ceased that would obviously indicate a contracting and very sick economy. But not if you look at GDP - it would rise. Likewise for government spending. Government could print a Trillion dollars tomorrow, build Mayan palaces across the US, and that would count as GDP growth ! [debt and costs of government spending are not factored in]

-This is a long term problem stemming from long term factors. Day rightly points out that economic recessions and depressions are long term in nature arising from systemic causes – all of them rooted in government policy. This recession is no different. It was caused by loose monetary policy over at least 10-15 years; governmental interference in banking, housing finance and land regulations; and government fiscal impropriety. It will take years to get out of this mess.

-Stock markets usually take a long time to retrace back to their highs which were hit before the crash occurred. Historical data from the past 70 years makes this point clear. There will be 'rallies', 'bull runs' and optimism. But given the real economic and debt issues facing the industrialized world, it is far more likely that the stock markets and the economy in general are heading in a long term trend of decline.

-Gold is the one hard commodity and money source you will want in part to own. If the stock markets do retrace to their lows and the economy does 'double dip' into another recession or worse, than having the security of gold will be a must.

Day is right when he states that only the market and the natural functioning of business cycles can get us out of this current recession and prevent a depression. As with the 1930s, government intervention and incompetence will only prolong and deepen the pain. Neo-Keynesian occultist nonsense, bad monetary policy and high inflation are the hallmarks of the future. The US could well go bankrupt, and we might see the US dollar replaced by another currency issued by a government which has literally annihilated and debased its currency, in order to inflate away its debts and obligations.

The only point I would disagree with Day on is his insistence that US troops leave every base and operation in which they are currently engaged in, anywhere in the world. He believes this would save money. It would do the opposite of course by compromising US interests, allowing the Fascist elements of Islam time to regroup and re-attack; and market to the world, the complete end of US hegemony. It would solve nothing and as a per-cent of US debt and fiscal problems the military is a piker – only 4 % of US GDP is spent on the military which is the same level as the fraud in the US health system.

In spite of that one limitation Day's book is well worth the read. It is well-written, historically accurate with lots of interesting information and explanations. By the book's end the reader will know plenty about monetarist theory, why the 'Austrian school' is the only valid explanation of economic events; and just how ignorant politicians and central bankers truly are. You will be a charm at dinner parties, ably capable of fending off the usual intonations that government needs to do more forwarded by the mainstream educated and state schooled model citizens. If you believe that the worst is yet to come, this book will provide a lot of useful information as to why you are right.

Economic data does not support a recovery.

Barry Eichengreen and Kevin O'Rourke are two well known economists writing at the research website voxeu.org. They are empiricists meaning that unlike most neo-Keynesians who believe in occult black magic and mystical concepts such as 'aggregate demand' and the 'output gap', they rely on reality and facts to guide their interpretations of what is happening with the world economy. Their analysis is clear – the shocks to the global trading and economic system in the recent, government created downturn, have been every bit as bad or worse, than the 1930s.

The threat of a 'double dip' stock and economic crash is quite real. World industrial production has improved since last spring – but it is still a steep decline, steeper than that experienced in the Great Depression. The same is true of stock markets. They have recovered but the sell-off was markedly quicker and more extreme than that of the 1929-1932 era. Global trade has likewise contracted to a far greater extent than during the 1930s.

Figure 1. World industrial production, now vs then [data to Sept '09]


Industrial production during the 1930s also showed some increases – only to fall further from its peak. The data for 2008 and 2009 are similar. Currently there is a broad downward trend, with some upturns to be expected. But it is clear that world trade and production have suffered a dramatic reverse. If we add to this future protectionism in the guise of the Gaia earth cult and carbon standards; environmental rules; and domestic job and union protectionism – trade will continue to suffer and not recover to its 2006 peak levels.

As well we need to keep in mind that even though markets, perhaps economic growth and international trade are slowly recovering, all of the issues which caused this crisis; massive sub-prime loans; leverage; easy credit; negative interest rates; are still in place and expanding. Debt, unfunded liabilities and the threat of extraordinarily high future taxation are still unwelcomed but probable realities. This is not only true in the US, but also in Europe and of course in Japan where a 20 year depression has reigned.

Figure Two: World Trade


As Eichengreen and O'Rourke make clear, this government – inspired economic disaster is not over:


“What do the new data tell us?

* Global industrial production now shows clear signs of recovering.

This is a sharp divergence from experience in the Great Depression, when the decline in industrial production continued fully for three years. The question now is whether final demand for this increased production will materialise or whether consumer spending, especially in the US, will remain weak, causing the increase in production to go into inventories, leading firms to cut back subsequently, and resulting in a double dip recession.

* Global stock markets have mounted a sharp recovery since the beginning of the year. Nonetheless, the proportionate decline in stock market wealth remains even greater than at the comparable stage of the Great Depression.

* The downward spiral in global trade volumes has abated, and the most recent month for which we have data (June) shows a modest uptick. Nonetheless, the collapse of global trade, even now, remains dramatic by the standards of the Great Depression.”


Add to this the reality of the following: income levels will not recover soon; there is guaranteed high inflation which will depress real incomes and earnings; many jobs will not be recovered since the 'jobs boom' of the past 10 years was based on a bubble; and interest rates must go up which will send many firms, individuals and even states towards bankruptcy. There is never a painless way of exiting a bubble. Yet we are to believe that 50 years of excess, government distortions and 10 years of leverage and lax monetary policy leading to an economic collapse will all be sorted out painlessly and quickly within a few years. This is highly unlikely.

The current government neo-Keynesian solution, implemented by every state in the world is to spend more money, increase the debt, maintain negative interest rates and print money. It makes no sense. We have the worst aspects of leverage monetary policy and demand side management [to stimulate the consumer] at work. It must end badly. The debt overhang from this collective madness will by itself doom future economic growth. Trade restrictions; higher taxes and more governmental control are impossible to avoid. None of this bodes well for a 'recovery' – irregardless of what the media keeps repeating.

So what happens when Gold prices hit $1500 per oz. ?

With gold approaching $1200 per oz., up from $250 a mere 5 years ago, what is that telling us about the state of geo-political and economic affairs ? Is it just another commodity-bubble market ? Or maybe just more nasty speculators daring to make a profit ? Perhaps it is the insidiously corrupt Wall Street and Goldman Sachs – the US Government's financial slave – manipulating the yellow currency for its own cryptic means ? It is all of these things and yet more. If gold prices move from $1200 to $1500 we will have two indisputable facts to reckon with: 1) Future high US based inflation and 2) An economic Depression.

An iron law of investing is to do the opposite of what 'media experts' tell you. By the time the grinning teeth with the makeup and hair 'advise' you on something it is usually too late, too wrong, or too corrupt to consider. Witness their expert advice telling the hoi-polloi to buy condos in Miami or jet-set to Dubai to behold a bankrupted state's narcissism and real estate bubble. So what are most 'savvy' 'experts' telling you ? The usual. They state that gold is over bought, the rally in the precious metal is a bubble; and that the US dollar will rebound because the US economy is going to have a V shaped recovery – with the V looking perhaps more like an U. US GDP and employment growth [both stats are frauds and at the mercy of government manipulation], will be raging in 2010 and beyond. Happy days are soon here again.

So the grinning idiots who did nothing to predict the latest economic meltdown tell us. So who do you believe, government shills or your own lying eyes ?

Gold's meteoric rise in the past 5 years has been one of the great commodity gains in history. It is thus a long term trend – not a bubble. Gold might be telling us something different from the 'experts' and that inference is most likely, that the current economic re-ordering is going to be a long lasting Great Recession – or worse.

Recognize this: the 'experts' and mainstream economists are Neo-Keynesians. They believe that big government, big spending, big programs and mass socialization can 'save' the economy – from government created catastrophes. Neo-Keynesianism based on the incorrect, improbable and rather occult theories of 'aggregate demand' and managing the 'demand gap', as evinced by the effete, homosexual Keynes during the 20s and 30s, is utter bunk. Keynesianism is garbage – a theory looking for real world relevancy. Yet it is the policy of choice for Statists, giving them a panache of intellectual gravitas [but Keynes talked with a lisp and wore tweed jackets!], as well as a quack-science [akin to Marxism], justifying the expansion of state intervention.

In the real world we all know that government's create cycles of booms and busts – they don't resolve them. The more intrusive the state the worse the result – as the Great Depression and this current crisis, which is no where near ending, both demonstrate. The more neo-Keynesian the state, the more likely that monetary and central bank policy is completely politicized [like the US Federal Reserve], and the more obvious the corruption between the state and the large financial houses [like the Washington-Wall Street nexus].

The test for Gold will come in the first half of 2010. If the price of this metal crashes through the important barrier of $1500 the following will be true:

-Real US unemployment [not the government figures] will be 25-30%.
-Real US GDP normalizing for real inflation [not the government figures] will be in the process of contracting upwards of 30% from its $14 Trillion level.
-Real US per capita income [not the government figure] will fall to $25.000 per capita [or the level of Israel].
-Real inflation measures [not the government figures] will be 8% or greater.
-Stock markets will eventually realign with reality and proceed downwards to match their previous 2009 lows.

If gold goes through the $1500 barrier it will be telling us quite simply that the US and the industrialized world will have high inflation; low to zero real economic growth; and the specter of state bankruptcy. The US is technically bankrupt already. There is no disputing this fact. This is one reason why gold keeps rising. The US state cannot afford its debts, it future liabilities and its obligations especially as interest rates will need to rise to fend off very strong inflationary pressures. The US dollar is doomed, and gold will take its place rightly or wrongly as the world's reserve and standard currency.

Gold is telling you something. It might pay to listen. It might also pay to ignore the talking circuses in the media which did not predict this latest catastrophe – a regressive process, which by the way is not over, but just starting.

Politicized Central Banks do not control inflation.

One of the important lessons of Friedman's monetarist theory is the non-economic observation he made about central banks. Friedman was convinced that central banks over time become politicized and that the leaders of the central bank – their personalities, psychologies, pathologies – massively impact monetary policy including the setting of rates and the printing of money. He was right. Friedman's analysis and those of the Austrian economic school make one empirically valid and crucial point – central banks destroy monetary value, they do not protect it.

When Bernanke or any central bank Chairman tells the media that the current economic crisis, which was caused by government and political interference in the housing market stretching back 50 years; and which was abetted and accelerated by grotesquely incompetent and easy monetary policy during the Bush administration; was in actual fact not caused by too much money, low interest rates and political meddling in housing finance, one can assume he is either a liar, a political puppet, or stupid. Since Bernanke is obviously not dumb, the first two options must apply. The US central bank formed in 1913 and the 4th in US history, long ago ceased being independent and has been for some time, simply a tool of the Treasury department, or in other words, the puppet-monetary division of big government.

Friedman's monetarist theories have much to commend them. He proved that government caused the Great Depression, turning what should have been a necessary and sharp recession into an economic disaster. Personalities played a huge role in the fiasco of the 1930s. When Strong the realist Fed Reserve chairman died in 1928, his successors had no experience and no conceptions on how to deal with recessions. All of their policy choices reflected their bias to maintaining the US dollar-Gold standard relationship by reducing money supply and raising rates to attract capital – the opposite of what should have been done [and probably enacted at the behest of the politicians who for many reasons wanted to remain on the Gold standard]. The administrations of Hoover and FDR – socialist, statist and enamoured with central planning – raised tariffs, taxes, regulations and fiscal spending to absurd levels. In combination with poor monetary policy, statism assured that a Depression would begin.

It is a well worn fact that since 1914 the US dollar has lost 95 % of its value. Most of this has occurred in the years since 1945, and the implementation of runway monetary growth and fiscal Keynesianism. In the 70 odd years before 1913, when the US did not have a central bank, the US dollar maintained its value. In fact the average real inflation rate of money growth during the life-spans of all 4 US central banks has been 11-14% per annum! This growth in money supply [M1, M2 and M3 which is now no longer reported by the government], which is far in excess of real GDP growth net of inflation, population and household growth is simply immoral. It accounts for the destruction of US dollar value from 1913 to 2010. Yet the pious Fed Reserve charter lists controlling inflation and maintaining the stability of the US dollar as its key prerogatives, along with, rather bizarrely, creating full employment.

It is clear that the US central bank – like all central banks – has not protected the value of its national currency. It is also obvious that no central bank can possibly have 'full employment' as a mandate. Central banks do not operate or control the economy, they do not create jobs or stimulate investment, they do not allow for the manufacture of profits or new markets. The only role a central bank has is in controlling the money supply to reduce inflationary pressures and setting interest rates at levels to depress any inflationary trends in the economy. That is it. The creation of employment is entirely a supply side, market based set of initiatives, and policies resting in an optimistic, rational and legal political-economic framework.

Central banks have thus undermined not only the living standards of their populations, but also the very functioning of the economy. By promoting inflation, and bubbles, central banks have destroyed trillions in wealth. Central bank created bubbles in the past 20 years include the Savings and Loan banking disaster in the southern US during the 1980s; the internet bubble, and of course the recent housing finance catastrophe. The central bank was not the only actor involved in these 3 bubbles – but it was a vital player. Its independence has long been forsaken. We now have the central bank as the lackey of government with monetary policy supporting fiscal Keynesianism and endless government spending.

As Judy Shelton wrote in WSJ, the real inflation rate in the economy, makes a mockery of the Fed Reserve's claims that it protects the US dollar:

"According to U.S. Census Bureau statistics, the average sales price of a new home in 2000 was $207,000; the average price in 2007 was $313,600, more than 50% higher in just seven years. During the same period, based on Consumer Price Index (CPI) numbers for the interim years provided by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the average sales price of a new home should have been $250,625 in 2007—that is, if the CPI fully captured the impact of excessive monetary issuance."
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704842604574642153438387892.html

In this simple example the increase in money and liquidity, combined with real negative interest rates, induced people to use leverage to buy or upgrade homes. This increase in money supply thus increased the demand for housing and house upgrades. Prices naturally rose. But at some level the amount of debt, the size of the house, or the cost of the upgrade will arrest the price appreciation. This is especially true as interest rates rise. Once rates go up the demand for housing investment must fall. It is at this point when demand is completely satiated and can rise no further, and when the costs of leverage become too onerous, that prices will go into a large decline.

All of this was created by politicians, their housing finance scams and programs, and of course central bank monetary policy. There never was a US market in housing or home finance. It was a government created distortion.

Look at it another way as given by Shelton's analysis. If you normalize real inflation into the lie and scam called 'the GDP rate of growth', you will find that the US economy has not grown at all during the past 10 years. The only thing which has grown is big government under the Bush-Bama regency, and the increase in the dollar's value decline. The average US taxpayer should be furious about the destruction not only of their wealth; but the distortive and quite nefarious impacts of bubbles on the economy and personal lives. It is simply a travesty.

This destruction of the US dollar's buying capability is of course reflected in the price of Gold – another statistic that printing-mad big Ben Bernanke fails to acknowledge:

"And what about gold? The price of gold has soared to $1,128 today from $282 at the beginning of the decade, a fourfold increase. During the critical 2002-2006 period—when Mr. Bernanke insists monetary policy was consistent with the Fed's price-stability goals—the dollar price of gold climbed steadily to $700 from below $300. Did the governors of our nation's central bank not notice? Given that the U.S. government holds the largest amount of official gold reserves in the world, it would seem pertinent."

The real world black and white facts are this. Gold has doubled in 10 years. The US dollar has fallen 35% in 10 years. Two enormous bubbles have been created in the same 10 years. Trillions of aggregate wealth has been vaporized. Yet the US central bank calmly maintains that it is doing a great job. Even today it is following the bubble prescription; zero interest rates; money supply growth of 10% per annum; and guarantees to banks. So when will the next bubble occur and how ugly will it be ?

In the real world outside of theory there is one sure iron law of economics. Once the central bank becomes a political tool; and once the central bank engages in statist economic management, the destruction of wealth, jobs and economic progression is assured. The US Fed Reserve has been distorting the US economy since 1913. Well done.

US Bankruptcy: Economic mumbo-jumbo and 'hiding the decline'.

It is not only the Globaloney Warming Fascistas and One-World Marxist morons who 'hide the decline'. In the case of the obvious cooling climate, the Gaia cult has a hard time to hide reality – though they still maintain that Mommy Earth is going to explode from on overdose of Co2. Not so for the Economistas and the Keynesian-Government will save us-cult. They have every incentive and every method to hide the economic decline – and they do it very well. The simple fact is that the usual metrics to inform the hoi-polloi about GDP, economic expansion or contraction and inflation are absolute hokum. The impact on policy and policy makers, not to mention the geniuses who covet political and economic control are vast.

Governments have one goal: to expand the state to fill all the most important requirements of the political-economy. It is bureaucratic narcissism and statism. Governments are not some Keynesian economic actor which is stable and static. They are more like the Friedman depiction of flourishing, dynamic, and often times immoral enterprises quite interested and focused on money, power and regulation. They are not benign Marxist entities full of morality, faith and hope. They wish to rule and to coerce.

In this regard the methods that all modern Governments use to control their economy are premised on three facts:

1.Control the money supply and interest rates or monetary policy through a supposedly independent central bank [the US Fed Reserve long ago lost its political virginity and independence].
2.Issue endless propaganda and 'science' supporting economic demand or consumer side management as evinced by the works of Keynes and Samuelson, even though any serious study of economic reality renders both Keynes and Samuelson completely and utterly irrelevant and dangerous.
3.Always spend more money, and always call for more regulation. Any 'crisis' even if caused by government, such as the current US housing finance criminality, is blamed on external actors or the convenient 'market'.

To buttress the above the Government must control all economic data. Thus the spectacle during the 1930s of the Nazis reporting 6% per annum 'GDP' growth when the entire Nazi state was autarchic; had no foreign capital; little foreign trade and almost no private investment. Pray tell where the economic growth came from ? The Nazis printed money, stole private assets and used them to fund state projects – but the debt or the inflation from the printing presses were never calculated as costs. Yet the grinning Western idiots in the media accepted the Nazi claims of GDP acceleration – endorsing the Nazi 'economic miracle' and musing about how to copy the Fuhrer's genius.

GDP is a silly calculation developed by the Russian born economist Kuznets and presented to FDR's treasury in 1934. The very fact that GDP as a sacrosanct measurement was formed during the statist communalist career of FDR should give any sentient human pause enough. But even Kuznets admitted many times that the calculation was not meant to be accurate – just a rough guide as to how the economy was reacting to government policy. [see http://www.craigread.com/displayArticle.aspx?contentID=1140&subgroupID=12]. As I wrote a while ago – GDP is simply totally inaccurate:

“First Kuznets came up with the 'expenditures approach' where you add up total spending on all final goods and services or in eco-geek speak:  (Consumption goods and services (C) + Gross Investments (I) + Government Purchases (G) + (Exports (X) - Imports (M)) or [GDP = C + I + G + (X-M)].
......
The most primary objection to using the expenditure model  is that the output bought in a nation state is not reflective of its true economy. As the Austrian-school economist Shostak stated a government for instance, can build pyramids across a country – a totally useless enterprise – but GDP would reflect a large growth. This would be a fallacious growth of course. Government spending replaces private capital and leads to debt and interest payments – neither of which are factored against public spending 'GDP' stimulus'.'

GDP thus overstates the role of government – which is precisely its purpose. Imagine if the Black Jesus paid every American $1 to go dig a hole which he would call 'infrastructure spending'. Americans dig their holes and then receive in aggregate $300 million. But that money has to come from somewhere and since the US is running huge deficits, it would have to come from foreign lenders like the Chinese or from the printing presses of madman Ben Bernanke. Both carry costs of course. None of the costs are factored against the $300 million. You could imitate the Nazis and build useless colossi everywhere and the 'economists' would be telling us that GDP expanded by x %. This is simply idiocy.

The other reason why GDP rates are bogus is inflation. If you factor in real inflationary rates GDP in the US has actually been flat or in decline for the past 10 years. Governments conveniently leave out most of the costs that each household faces. Food, energy and housing prices are excluded from the inflation number – more than 50% of most household budgets. If you were to normalize for this, actual GDP growth over the past 10-15 years has been less than 1 % per annum.

“In other words, the actual GDP growth rate from 1990 to 2006 was only 29.5%, an annualized rate of 1%. This is a far cry short of the official government statistics.

I still haven't corrected for the increase in the number of households. In 1989, there were 93,347 thousand households, and there were 114,384 thousand households in 2005. That is a gain of 22.5%. If you subtract 22.5% from 29.5%, you get 7%. (The housing stats table doesn't have an entry for 2006, so I used 1989-2005 instead of 1990-2006.)

Contrary to official reports, GDP has only increased by 7% per household from 1990 to 2006. That is an annualized real GDP growth rate of only 0.27%.

If you use M3 instead of M2, you would find that GDP has decreased substantially since 1990. Luckily, the Federal Reserve ceased publishing M3!”
http://fskrealityguide.blogspot.com/2007/12/real-gdp-growth-has-been-negligible.html

Controlling interest rates, the money supply and information on economic growth and inflation is rather important for the Statists. They can manufacture crises whenever they want and then demand government action. It is as if a group of people burned down your house and then told you that they are the only ones who can rebuild it – for a nice profit. You might be rather chagrined at such a claim and state of affairs. But that is what we are faced with the scampering political baboons and their illiterate bureaucracy. They can print money, create inflation, incur unsustainable debts, manipulate GDP and inflation reports – and then tell us to trust them, that yes they will fix all of the problems which they have coincidentally produced. It is psychologically deranged. It is the talk of madmen.

“Let's summarize. Our current methods of calculating GDP are NOT correct and lead only to the stimulation of government and union goons running our lives. The consumer is not 70% of the economy. Ergo demand or consumer 'stimulus' plans are bound to fail. What are needed are plans, policies and obsessions to stimulate supply, and the creation of capital and jobs. Want to help the so-called poor ? Besides weeping and moaning for more governmental transfers how about this ? Stimulate the supply of jobs and wages. That will do more to 'fix' the economy and help the 8% of people who are poor, than all the demand side plans of the 'Great Men' can possibly do.” http://www.craigread.com/displayArticle.aspx?contentID=1140&subgroupID=12

Exactly right. Which is why it will never happen and which is why bankruptcy is America's future.

The UN: Churchill's folly.

Churchill made many mistakes in a glorious career. His list of errors are impressive and many have had long lives. No error in judgement however, has been as consequential and as permanent, and so detrimental to Western interests, than the establishment of the United Nations. The mephistophelian allure of 'transnational' governance, solidarity and 'moral purpose', which would and must, metastasize into a cancer of Biblical proportions, was ignored by the founders of the UN, including both Churchill and Roosevelt. Churchill never gave any serious thought or critical thinking to the monstrosity being erected during the desperate days of World War II. It is quite easily, his greatest blunder.

The UN or Useless Nations Organization was intended to replace the failed League of Nations which collapsed with the rise of Fascist Marxism in the guise of Hitler, Mussolini and Stalin. The League was useless. It did not stop the Italian war on Abyssinia; the Japanese invasion of Korea and China; the rise of Hitlerism and the expansion of the Nazi state; the breaking of the rather tame and tepid Versailles Treaty [it could and should have been a much tougher Treaty]; nor the slaughter of non-Red Russian civilians in the Leninist civil war. It was a colossal mockery. Yet upon this tragic failure, Churchill the erstwhile romantic and apostle of 'better days' of 'sunlit uplands', based his hope on a new post Nazi-war, world order.

The whole idea of the UN, even in the dark, dangerous days of World War II was madness.

The entire concept of a super-charged, transnational organization maintaining 'peace' and guaranteeing 'rights' came from the expedient and fertile minds of both Churchill and Roosevelt. It was crafted as part of the 'Atlantic Charter' meeting off of the coast of Canada, in August 1941, in which the US and Britain pledged to uphold the sanctity of states, individual rights, and take measures to create a sustainable era of peace. Roosevelt proposed the name 'United Nations' and this name was used to denote the gaggle of nations involved in defeating militaristic Fascism.

The details of the UN were thus worked on mostly by the British and Americans from 1941 onwards, and the outlines of this super-group were drawn up at Dumbarton Oaks, near Washington DC in 1943. The ‘Big Four’ - China, Britain, USA and Russia - drew up the guiding principles of the ‘general international organisation’ including:

-The UN's purpose would be to maintain international security and peace and guarantee human rights as codified by the UN.
-It would seek to develop friendly relations amongst all nations.
-The UN would try to manage international economic, social and humanitarian problems.
-The UN would be a forum for all nations to discuss, debate and resolve problems peacefully.

All nice ideas – but entirely utopian. The Americans for sundry economic, political and ideological reasons, viewed the creation of a new League, in which all nations would share the political and budgetary pain of upholding international 'standards' and ensuring 'territorial integrity' of the membership, a rather practical and realistic ideal. For the Americans the attitude was that the UN would always remain under US control, forever. A rather dimwitted assertion as time has proven.

Churchill on the other hand saw it as a vehicle to sustain British relevancy. For the British the UN was to be a forum in which they would be one of the '5 Great Powers', maintaining, however implausible it actually was, its world power status. Yet like the Americans the British were whistling in the wind. Great Britain in 1945 was no longer Great and quite bankrupt. Neither the UN, nor any other communitarian creation was going to change the facts of geo-politics and reality-based economics. Churchill was mistaken. The UN would not sanction Britain's relevancy. It would over time, just make Great Britain a lot more Little.

The UN was like so many other 'great ideas' - emotionally satisfying but devoid of intelligent analysis or critical thinking. No one in power seriously forwarded some obvious concerns about the creation and then the self propelling life-force of a supra-national body. Once you establish a bureaucracy you have to expect it to assume its own vitality and purpose. The leaders of the bureaucracy will develop their own objectives and goals – irregardless of what the 'shareholders' might want. The more disperse the control, the greater the chance that the bureaucracy in question will simply spiral out of control.

There was thus no cognitive analysis of this socialist-pacficist ideal of a 'One World' organization. Where would this group stop ? How large would it become ? How ambitious ? How meddlesome in the politics of states ? It is obvious that the entire UN ideal was one based on the emotional and intellectual - not the rational, practical or moral. Churchill, the lover of democracy and state greatness never asked some obvious questions:

-Who should be a member – what are the criteria ?
-Why should non-democratic states be admitted ?
-Why should states who did nothing to fight Fascism be members ?
-What about those states who supported Fascism ?
-How would the UN in practice 'solve' military or issues around war ?
-How to limit the money needed or expensed for this organization, and the obvious abuse, waste and fraud which occurs in each and every bureaucracy ?
-How to control it properly so it actually defends its ideals in the future ?
-How to limit its activities so that member states are not interfered with by an unaccountable bureaucracy ?

None of these common-sensical objections or critiques were uttered.

In essence the entire idea of an unaccountable, non-democratic body such as the UN was not only insipid but immoral. Nations with absolutely no common interests, cultures, attitudes, or political-military-economic alliances and cycles, will not suddenly throw down their legacies and self-interests because they are part of some 'United Nations' forum. It is utter bunk. They will do what all self interested states do – use the system to their advantage, as they are doing today in the case of the Third World demanding more Western guilt money; Islam demanding UN protection; and the Globaloney Warming cult demanding taxes, regulations and economic control – under the guise of the UN's mandate.

Churchill should have made two simple rules in the deal-making around the creation of the UN. These rules would have been vital to constructing a coalition of states of like-minded actors which common attitudes and interests:
Rule 1: The UN must be composed only of allied Democracies who have fought against Fascism.
Rule 2: The UN must be transparent, accountable and its charter must be up for renewal, in a forum vote every 4 years.

By not standing up for transparency, real-politick, democracy and alliance patterns Churchill abdicated his duty. By letting Roosevelt and the Americans develop the inanity of a One-World body into an actual creation, Churchill ignored the very real consequences – easily observable in the lamentable League of Nations – in vesting power with an undemocratic and alienated bureaucratic elite. In that sense Churchill's greatest disaster was not the Dardanelles, his Chancellorship, or Singapore and ignoring the Japanese threat. His greatest legacy of failure is the monster which stalks all Western states and Israel today – the United Nations.

Debt and inflation – the killers of empires.

Will America go bankrupt ? The idea seems fantastical. A short time ago the media and various experts were pronouncing a new world order of unlimited American economic expansion; geo-political hegemony; and surging stock markets the 'indispensable nation' in Albright's words. Debt and future obligations were deemed manageable and easily accommodated by rising economic growth and potential rents and profits. No one seriously discussed American declinism. Than a government manufactured housing finance disaster ensued and suddenly the underlying weakness of the American model – statism, corruption, debt, government distortion, easy money, over and poor regulation – was revealed. The American elite knows that inflation and debt kill empires. The real question is – why don't they do something to solve their problems ?

The Americans are not stupid. Neither is their elite. Even a radical Marxist like the Black Jesus, or MIMH [most important man in history], probably has a rudimentary concept of why states collapse. Inflation and debt are the most consistent killers of empires in history. This is true if one takes a cursory glance at the end of some of history's most glorious empires all of whom were supposed to 'last forever' and dominate their geo-political environments for eternity.

Rome: From 200 AD until 400 AD the Roman denarius or silver based coin declined in value by 95 %. Inflation destroyed the economy and the belief in being a 'Roman'. State taxation more than doubled. Citizens became indifferent to the idea of Rome. Along with social catastrophes [civil wars, the plague, a reduced population, no innovation etc.], the Roman state collapsed long before 476 AD.

Imperial Spain: Once the Spanish discovered and exploited the silver mines at Potosi in the 16th century, the amount of silver in circulation in Spain and Europe increased by 10 times during the 17th century. The result was of course a strong upward increase in inflation and prices which lasted 3 generations. The Spanish did not understand that minting money would cause severe dislocations including; a reduction in economic productivity; a decline in investments; and lower tax revenues. The Spanish state, engaged in wars literally across the world, was heavily in debt, and like Rome, the combination of huge debts, interest payments and hyper-inflation doomed it to oblivion.

Louis the XIV and XVI: In the late 17th century the French under the Sun King began to imitate Imperial Spain and Rome. Colossi were built using public debt including the rather useless but pretty Versailles. Wars were fought to expand French claims to empire – mostly financed by external debt. By the time the armies of Marlborough defeated Louis, the French state was near collapse. This led to severe economic problems during the 17th century including the Mississippi land scam and ponzi scheme; higher taxes; punitive regulations; and state control over most of the economy. A revolution was inevitable. By the time Louis the XVI took office, and the 1789 revolution commenced, the French livre was useless, income taxes approached 80 % and the population had had enough.

Britain: The British until recently had always enjoyed a minimalist state. Prior to 1945 the British state was never larger than 25% of GDP and its debt was always 50% or less of national income. Imperial over-reach and two World Wars changed this. Contrary to Marxist fantasy, the British imperial project had negative terms of trade starting in the late 19th century. Outflows and investments to Canada, Argentina, India and Africa were far in excess of returns and inflows. In other words the British imperial project was draining capital and profits long before World War One. With the advent of two wars for survival, British debt exploded – and its currency value plummeted. Within 25 years the British pound had lost 40% of its value and British debt was 150% of national income. By 1945 the British had no gold reserves left, and 70% of their overseas assets were guaranteeing their debt to America. With a national debt approaching two times the size of the war shattered economy, the British, to quote Churchill 'were bankrupt'.

USA: Since 1900 the US dollar has declined in value by 95%. US debt has now increased by a factor of 700 % during the same period. Total US debt and entitlements stretching to 2025 now stand at $130-150 Trillion or 8-10 times the size of the current US economy. No state or empire in history has ever had a national balance sheet of such debt-ladened proportions, buttressed by a declining currency.

The Americans don't need to go bankrupt but it will take some peculiar political will to right-size the sinking ship of Americana. Looking at the scampering pygmies on display today- Obama, Pelosi, Reid, Geithner, and the left overs from Bush's Big Governmental era including Bernanke a central banker who believes that printing money means prosperity – it is hard not to be more than just a tad negative about American prospects.

What should be done ? To save their empire the Americans have no choice but to take the following 10 steps:

1. Raise interest rates to be above near future inflation and population growth meaning today they should be at 3 % minimum.
2. Reduce the amount of money supply and stop printing money.
3. Support a strong US dollar policy through the above.
4. Cut Federal taxes to stimulate economic growth.
5. Cut 50% of Federal spending to pay for the tax cuts.
6. Stop the Obama $800 billion stimulus of government and instead make it a legal budget obligation to start paying off the debt each and every year.
7. Stop all subsidies to the housing market including closing all CRA, HUD and FHA programs which give low income people, speculators and others sub prime loans [now valued at over $1 Trillion].
8. Allow for the bankruptcy and reorganisation of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, the two state owned institutions which were instrumental in causing the current economic meltdown.
9. Forget about socializing health care and Globaloney Warming carbon taxation and economic control.
10. Privatize Medicaid and Medicare – both of which are bankrupt and get that $85 Trillion future debt off the government's books as a future obligation.

If the Americans did the above their empire would survive. But they won't. Rates will be kept low because the Americans can't afford higher interest payments on government or personal debt. The US dollar will be destroyed to appease exporters. Stimulus packages will be enacted to expand government and buy off union votes – the exact same reason why health care will be socialized. Globaloney warming will be used as an excuse to increase both taxes and spending. In fact the US elite, certainly not a stupid bunch, will do the very opposite of what needs to be done. All for power and control.

And this is usually how the beginning of the end happens. Short term political opportunists, corruptocrats, and statists who elevate power, money and influence over the national interest. It is nothing new in history. And the outcome is entirely predictable.

American debt, financial collapse and the ugly reality of Statism.

Only during the late 19th century was America a free-market system. Even during this halcyon period of individualism, capital formation, energy, innovation and the conquering of an entire continent, the US political system was still wedded to tariffs and trade distortions. But the facts are irrefutable. With the corruption and meanness of government constrained and limited, the Americans were able to invent many, if not most, of the technologies which informed the modern world and which established the basis of everything which is used today. Yet how different the cultural milieu is only four to five generations later. America is well on its way to financial insolvency thanks to the unfettered illiteracy and criminality of statism and socialism. At least $100 Trillion in US-government debt and obligations now exists. There is no possibility whatsoever, of paying this off. Bankruptcy either at the state [California] or at the national level in some form, is a real possibility.

The US Federal government was expanded 40% by G. W Bush – the supposed conservative - from $2 Trillion to $3.3 Trillion per annum. Bush was no more a conservative than the most important man in history or MIMH – the Black Jesus. Under the MIMH the Federal tax revenues have gone from $3.3 Trillion to $4 Trillion [so much for that recession]. Under the big government-Liberal Bush, the US National debt almost doubled from $5.3 Trillion to close to $10 Trillion. And of course under the MIMH the debt will double to $20 Trillion with 4 years.

Against Federal revenues of say between $3.5 Trillion and $4.0 Trillion per annum, the US national debt of even $15 Trillion is unsustainable. At $15 Trillion the interest payments alone would consume almost 30% of all Federal taxes. This would mean that on average US taxes – just to pay off the interest on the total debt – will need to go up by at least 30% from current levels. Such a tax increase on income, capital and dividends would cause a contraction in investment, jobs and economic activity and actually result in fewer US national tax revenues and thus a larger problem in trying to service the debt and pay the various welfare expenses now demanded of the national government.

Consider the following real world facts – in trillions of USD when considering debt between now and 2030:

1.US Federal Governmental Debt – 2015: $20 Tr
2.State and Local Governmental Debt – currently:$ 5 Tr
3.Unfunded Socialized Medicine – current est: $65 Tr
4.Unfunded Social Security - current est.: $15 Tr
5.Government guaranteed pensions – est: $ 7 Tr
6.Current TARP/Financial Bailout: $ 3 Tr
7.Future Fannie/Freddie Sub-prime bailout: $1 Tr [min.]
Total: $ 116 Trillion

The US thus has an existing $116 Trillion total debt and future obligations spread over the next 20 years. Fully 60% are in socialized medicine – Medicaid and Medicare – two bankrupted systems that the MIMH and his union appeasing elitist political friends want to extend to the entire US health system. Once national health care is passed the total US debt over the next 20 years will likely be more than $130 Trillion. At $130 Trillion, total US debt and obligations will be at least 6 times the size of the US economy and national income – and that assumes a reasonable GDP growth which given the future realities is not going to happen.




Debt levels at 600-700% of national income have never been recorded in the national accounts of any modern state. Bankruptcy is therefore a foregone conclusion. It will be impossible to fund all this debt. Consider the following:

-$100 to 130 Trillion of debt, over 20 years, means another $5 Trillion per year in obligations – much of it at the Federal level – which is more than double current Federal tax revenues.

-To fund and pay off this extra $5 Trillion per year [which is really what needs to happen to account for and put on the balance sheet these very real obligations which are now pushed off the balance sheet and ignored by government ], which is the equivalent of 35% of total GDP, it would be necessary to almost double all Federal taxes on income, capital, investment and assets.

-Since doubling taxes is politically impossible, only two things can be done; issue more debt and, or, print more money.

-Both of these options will depress and maybe destroy the value of the US dollar. This is especially true since currently the Fed Reserve is sitting with a balance sheet of some $2 Trillion in bad assets that it can't unload – and when or if it does, the US dollar has to go down.

Given the actions of the MIMH's administration and the complete politicization of the US Central Bank, here is how the US will hope to avoid bankruptcy:

The US will print money, devalue its debt obligations, and attempt to increase its Federal tax revenues by 50%, over the next 8 years. It will also allow states like California and New York to declare bankruptcy.

The US dollar will continue its unraveling. The consequences for the US empire and for the world will be immense. But the policies, politicians and attitudes now in place make it clear what the American elite will attempt to do. The US political elite in order to avoid doing the obvious will try to 'Argentinize' their debt obligations and selectively allow debt defaults and trying to inflate their way out of the mess.

And that is just government debt. Keep in mind that currently US households owe $15 Trillion in debt including $11 Trillion in mortgage debt; and $4 Trillion in credit card and student debts. It is unclear how many private citizens are going to go bankrupt but the number must be large. Incomes do not match debt levels or debt obligations.

An American bankruptcy might not happen. But the current conditions and realities suggest it is certainly plausible and even likely, at least in part. Statism, socialization and buying votes has its nefarious consequences.

Given the current crop of incompetent politicians it is hard to believe that the Americans will actually do what needs to be done, to avoid a massive debt default. Facts are not only stubborn things, according to John Adams, but they are also not grey - but rather black and white.

One has to wonder what old John Adams would think of his new Republic looking more like the bankrupted French state of Louis the XIV.

Obama and Louis as historical soul mates ?

1000 snow and cold records in the past month. Must be Globaloney Warming !!

The Useless Nations has already declared that 2009 was the hottest year on record. In the corruptocracy of the UN, 2009's unbelievable hot temps are followed by 2008, 2007 and 2006 of course. Every year is the hottest year for the UN and its IPCC criminality. The earth is warmer than Tiger Wood's underwear at a Perkins diner, which is why of course 1000 cold, snow and winter records have been set in North America alone in the past month. Because little Gaia is heating up, cold records now abound across Europe with thousands dying from the low temperatures. It is a lot colder because of Globaloney Warming ! Little minds united.

Certainly without any doubt, the UN will declare this coming December that the winter of 2010 was the warmest in 4.6 billion years. And the grinning media-academic elite - arrogant, dumb, and gaping - will rush to the barricades to defend the IPCC; their dear Earth mother, and the idiotic idea that Co2 is forcing up temperatures, just as they are plunging, and have been declining across the world, for the past 10 years.

As the Drudge report states – just check out these headlines from around the world – obviously Mother Earth is heating up:

Here are the top weather stories around the world from Drudge Report today:
Winter Could Be Worst in 25 Years for USA – 3 Deaths Due To Cold in Memphis – Gas Supplies Running out in UK – Vermont sets ‘all-time record for one snowstorm’ – Iowa temps ‘a solid 30 degrees below normal’ – Seoul buried in heaviest snowfall in 70 years – Historic ice build-up shuts down NJ nuclear power plant – Beijing, coldest in 40 years – Miami shivers from coldest weather in decade

China and Britain on opposite sides of the world apparently, are freezing up with their worst winters in some 40-70 years and the coldest is still to come:

“Yesterday, major highways in Beijing and Tianjin, as well as in the surrounding provinces and regions of Hebei, Shanxi and Inner Mongolia were closed due to the heavy snowfall.

Beijing Capital Airport said 120 departures had been postponed and 86 flights cancelled from late Saturday until mid-morning yesterday because of heavy snow and poor visibility.

Freezing temperatures have also hit Britain, which is bracing itself for one of the coldest winters for a century.

Parts of Scotland have been under snow for nearly three weeks and temperatures are expected to drop to minus 16 degrees.

Meteorologists predicted the freezing snap will last until at least mid-January, with snow, ice and severe frosts dominating.

And the likelihood is that the second half of the month will be even colder.” http://www.theage.com.au/world/siberian-winds-usher-in-record-lows-in-beijing-20100103-lna6.html

For much of the world the last 10 years has seen the worst winters on record. Record snowfalls, with snow falling in places which never get snow – Jerusalem, Johannesburg, Buenos Aires – or in months where no snow has previously been recorded in October including Atlanta, Houston, Detroit and even in Moscow in July, prove the lie which is Globaloney Warming. These real world facts, provable by peer review, observations and factual measurements, highlight the obvious fact that the world is certainly not heating up and is most likely going through a cooling phase. The climactic norm is of course an ice age.

But the useless idiots in the media all persist in defending their cult. Not one single major mainstream outlet has bothered to cover in detail the Climategate story in which an insider released 10 years of records showing that the entire Globaloney Warming cult was a scam, with faked data, criminal intent and conspiracy to defraud taxpayers of their money. In fact they claim that the leaked data was 'stolen' and ergo should be dismissed. Not one major publication has called for the indictment of the small group of scientists who lied; bullied their peers; refused to submit their data to scientific peer review; lost their data; and engaged in fraudulent behavior to acquire tax money to fund their careers and institutes.

In fact many reporters for Reuters, the AP, the New York Times, and others were on the Globaloney Warming cult's email lists. In other words the small cabal of 12-15 'quacks' parading as scientists were manipulating and distorting the opinions of supposed 'journalists' and had co-opted and corrupted them:


“The AP refused to let any of the “reporters” or editors involved with the “not faked” story speak to the Times, claiming that they did not have time. Ironically, one of the lead reporters who worked on the story is himself caught up in the Climategate scandal. The AP did note at the very end of its article that one of the Climategate e-mails was from one of the reporters working on the story — Seth Borenstein. But, the AP dismissed the e-mail as nothing more than a request “for reaction to a study, a standard step.” In reality, the e-mail is very damning of the AP science writer’s mentality.” http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/tech-mainmenu-30/environment/2662-ap-caught-misleading-on-climategate


This is just one example. The entire media complex is criminal. They shilled, sold and screamed that Globaloney Warming was real. The evidence points to the opposite – global cooling. The science does not support 'hockey stick curves' or the moronic theory that a natural chemical like Co2 which is necessary for life, and less than 1% of atmospheric gases in which the human is responsible for a mere 4-7% [do the math on how little that is]; somehow forces up 'global' temperatures in a complex convectional climate system.

Globaloney Warming is a financial and political scam. It always was. And the media are part of the mafia and criminals who have tried to foist this on an unsuspecting public. Surely there must be legal recourse to put these jerks in prison.

Book Review: Paul Johnson's 'Churchill'. 168 pages. Viking Press, 2009. Johnson at his lucid best.

Paul Johnson is a former Thatcher speech writer, and professional historian and word-smither. He has written works of magnificence on everything from ancient Egypt, America, Jews and Christians, to works on 'heroic historical figures', including this recent book on Churchill. Whether you are a Churchill 'novice' or well acquainted with the most important Briton in history, Johnson's book is a necessary read. He lays out the career, the failures, the successes and most importantly – the lessons – from the great man's career as the enclosed list highlights.

I have taken what I deemed to be some of Johnson's more interesting and lesser known appraisals of Churchill and listed them below. This is what might be claimed to be unique facts or insights. It is thus not a list of Churchill's career but some interesting facets thereof. All are correct, historically validated and yet many would be either news or a reaffirmation of facts once forgotten for even the most ardent of Churchilliana buffs. Many more could of course be added from Johnson's work, but one gets the idea from the items below:

Lessons for life:

“Churchill wasted an extraordinarily small amount of his time and emotional energy on the meanness of life: recrimination, shifting the blame onto others, malice, revenge seeking, dirty tricks, spreading rumours, harboring grudges, waging vendettas.” [p. 164]

“...Churchill never allowed mistakes, disaster – personal or national – accidents, illnesses, unpopularity, and criticism to get him down.” [p. 164]

Written word output:

“I calculate his total of words in print, including published speeches, to be between 8 and 10 million. There can have been few boys who made such profitable use of something learned at school. In that sense, Winston's education, contrary to the traditional view, was a notable success.” [p. 11]

Party politics:

“He was not a party man. That was the truth. His loyalty belonged to the national interest, and his own. At one time or another he stood for Parliament under six labels: Conservative, Liberal, Coalition, Constitutionalist, Unionist, and National Conservative.... at last he got a safe seat he could hold in all seasons, Epping in Essex...which he retained for thirty-five years...” [p. 23]

Inspirational leadership:

“So the first true victory Britain won in the war was the victory of oratory and symbolism. Churchill was responsible for both.” [p. 117]

On war:

“Churchill was never a warmonger as his enemies claimed. On the contrary: he warned against it just as urgently as he warned against unpreparedness for it – the two were indivisible. But Churchill was sufficient of a realist to grasp that wars will come, and that a victorious one, however dreadful, is preferable to a lost one.” [p. 21]

His favorite era:

“..Churchill later admitted that he relished the years before the First World War more than any other period of his career......In fact it was an age of turbulence, and that is one reason Churchill enjoyed it so much.” [p. 34]

The 1910-1913 Liberal-welfare state reforms:

“Churchill's reforms were not his work alone. For the first time he demonstrated his wonderful ability to galvanize civil servants into furious activity and dramatic innovations, and his equal skill in bringing to Whitehall brilliant outsiders....” [p. 29]

Churchill as First Lord of the Admiralty in World War One:

“The senior admirals regarded Churchill with horror, Junior officers, petty officers, and ratings saw him as a hero, especially after he improved pay and conditions....He looked into everything and everyone. He often worked 18 hours a day, and absorbed the new technology of naval warfare with impressive speed....He began the historic switch from coal to oil, and in the process laid down a new class, the Queen Elizabeth, of huge, oil-burning ships. He created the naval air service, and begged his ship architects to design him aircraft carriers.....and ..into the oil industry by investing in Persia and creating the great Anglo-Persian oil company [now BP].” [p. 38]

The failed Dardanelles operation of 1915:

“If Asquith had then appointed Churchill supremo of the operation (and told him to replace Fisher), the campaign might still have succeeded. But he did no such thing. He was already thinking of forming a coalition with the Tories and knew they would require Churchill's departure from the Admiralty as part of the price.” [p. 53]

Minister of Munitions in 1917 and his direct impact on ending the war:

“This was a brilliant move, [PM George appointing Churchill to run the Munitions Ministry in 1917], and Churchill rapidly made himself one of the most efficient departmental ministers in British history....In a short time of fanatical hard work Churchill made it simple, logical, and efficient.....the vast quantities of heavy artillery, mobile cannon, and machine guns Churchill sent played a notable part in the slaughter inflicted on the German divisions, which attacked in March 1918....The German army began to bleed to death – the prime cause of their plea for an armistice in November 1918.” [p. 58]

Israel:

“...when in 1922 the House of Commons showed signs of turning against the whole idea [of a Jewish national home], he made one of his greatest speeches, which swung MPs round into giving Jews their chance. Without Churchill it is very likely Israel would never have come into existence... It is not given to many men to found, or help preserve, one new state: his score was three (Iraq, Jordan, Israel).” [p. 63]

Churchill's poor tenure as Chancellor in the mid 1920s:

“Churchill's tenure of the exchequer had more serious consequences in a field where he might have been expected to be more sensible: defense. Here he changed his persona completely......taken a lead in the government's adoption of the Ten Year Rule, an official assumption there would be no major war in the next ten years....It meant Britain emerged from the twenties seriously underarmed for a world power.” [p. 81]

Churchill's Far East folly:

“Churchill's blindness to the power and intentions of the Japanese [during the 1920s and 30s] extended to the vulnerability of the new base being built at Singapore....it must be admitted he was a prime author of the British debacle in the Far East in 1941-42.” [p. 82]

Churchill the uninformed stock investory:

“....(his broker) had been investing his funds 'on margin' (something Churchill did not understand), so he not only lost all his money but had to buy himself out of the mess....Instead he redoubled his writing output, negotiating fresh contracts and lecture tours. He earnings rose to over 40.000 pounds, an immense income in those years.” [p. 85]

Mein Kampf:

“Churchill had read Mein Kampf and believed it represented Hitler's plain intentions. So did Hitler.” [p. 91]

Aid to Greece in 1941:

“By coming to the aid of Italy in Greece, Hitler was forced to postpone the invasion till the second half of June 1941, which in practice made it impossible for him to take Moscow and Leningrad before the winter set in....Moreover, his attack on Crete with his prize paratrooper forces proved so costly that he banned their use in the Russian campaign, a serious handicap as it turned out.” [p. 121]

Genetics:

“How much Winston inherited from his father, good or bad, is a matter of opinion. Mine is: not much. Indeed there was little of the Churchills in him. They were, on the whole, an unremarkable lot.” [p. 6]

Personal finances:

“Income should be expanded to meet expenditure.” [p. 26]

His drinking:

“Despite this, his liver, inspected after his death, was found to be as perfect as a young child's. Churchill was capable of tremendous physical and intellectual efforts, of high intensity over long periods, often with little sleep.” [p. 5]

His historical importance:

“No man did more to preserve freedom and democracy and the values we hold dear in the West. None provided more public entertainment with his dramatic ups and downs, his noble oratory, his powerful writings and sayings, his flashes of rage, and his sunbeams of wit. He took a prominent place on the public stage of his country and the world for over sixty years, and it seemed empty with his departure.” [p. 3]

This book is a gem in the library of Churchilliana. Johnson is a realist, a man proud of Western and English history, an erudite scholar who wades through an ocean of material and encapsulates in a few words what academics take a volume to tell. Any and all books by Paul Johnson stimulate the mind and inform the brain. One can't ask for more than that of any writer.

The communal socialism embedded in Fascist theologies.

Hitler and Mussolini were both Marxists. The socialist ethos of both of their Fascism's is quite obvious if one bothers to study their programs which were – with the exception of total Jew annihilation – rather similar. Hitler was quite open in his writings in Mein Kampf, his speeches and his asides to his acolytes, that the National Socialist plan was heavily premised on Marxist – Socialist ideology. The great modern welfare ideal was reflected in Nazi programs of 'free' coverage for any and all 'rights' that the Germans might care about. All to buy votes, subservience and remodel reality into a socialist-Nazi utopia. All of it Marxist spawned. All of it being imitated now in the modern world.

The first core of Marxism is the moronic 'stage' theory and the unquestioning submission to the inanity that history moves in steps from one end of a spectrum to the next. In this regard, Marxism claims to be 'scientific' since only its dialecticism can predict the 'future'. Marxism is always hailed by the great minds in academia as a 'total system' which can explain, social, political, and economic 'change. Marxism does not explain anything of course and engages only in the tiresome lies of class warfare, international class solidarity [which has never and never will exist]; and time-frames for revolution – all of which have been proven incorrect. Marxist stage theory ignores individuals, the dynamism of markets and capital, the benefits of freedom, and the improvements that a liberal-bourgeois world bestows on humans, the environment and life in general.

The second core of Marxist theology is the belief that capitalism will implode due to its own inconsistencies, which will breed mass impoverishment, worker rage and eventually a revolution as the tired peasant mass throw off the yoke of capitalist oppression. The end phase of human development is thus the eradication of capitalism by the working class. Markets, money and private property are all to be abolished. Only then will a communal utopia full of hope and peace be realized. Complete equality and justice will prevail. The individual will be joyfully subsumed and consumed into and by the communal. The 'volk' as it were, eating its young. With capital and money dead, bliss will follow.

To achieve Marxism's promise the imposition of a ruthless totalitarian elite is necessary of course. There has to be a leadership cult to organize the revolution; manage it; deconstruct the capitalist system; and then build the new utopia. Only force, violence and military force would permit the radical and systematic overthrow of the modern world, and the creation of a brave new world. Marxism is thus by its very design, a mandate for a military tyranny and for war.

Hitler understood his Marxist theory well. He fused Marxist and socialist ideals when he reformed the National Socialist party and began the political process to generate social 'reform'. In Hitler's distorted world view the German people were the legitimate rulers of the world. Aryan blood-lines were genetically connected to the supermen of Atlantis and racially pure Nordic stock was the evolutionary apogee of human development. Ergo Germany needed to dominate Europe and the globe. Jews, Slavs, Queers, gypsies and sub-humans, who were preying on German money and land had to be exterminated. In order to buy the votes of Germans, and gain their consent for the madness of his racial theories, Hitler turned to social engineering and the principles of Marxist dialecticism.

As I wrote earlier when reviewing Mein Kampf – a work which still needs to be read and understood since Arab Fascism is largely similar and encapsulated in the madness of the Koran:

"Hitler's obsession with the Jew, and with destroying Marxism which he viewed as a Jewish movement designed to control the world; was hardly unique. Many equated Marxist socialism with Jewish plots and conspiracies. Yet Hitlerism was itself of course a statist-socialist philosophy which pilloried Marxism for most of its ideas and fought with Marxists for the same political space and support. What differentiated Hitlerism from Marxism was its racial theory and extreme German nationalism. Marxism like Islam is not bound by color or nationality, but by adherence to the philosophy itself, an ideology demanding submission and compliance." http://craigread.com/displayArticle.aspx?contentID=1066&subgroupID=17

Hitler used socialism to expand the appeal of the Nazis across all classes. It is a simple truism that modern Fascism, premised on Marxism, must be a cross-class cult. Or else it will perish. To buy volk support Hitler and the Nazis created the first welfare state utopia – all of it now realized in every single Western state. The Nazi state guaranteed the 'rights' of Germans to have inter-alia: 'free' health care; free education; free baby care; free day-care; guaranteed jobs; pensions; welfare transfers and even leisure time. The Nazi welfare state was built upon the earlier work of Bismarck – itself a cynical ploy to quiet the middle class and buy them off with state goodies. It is rather ironic that the coveted 'values' on display in Western states, including Green Fascism and pagan Mother Earth worship, all emanate from the Nazi cult.

Yet during the 1930s the obvious bankruptcy of the German state, which made war in 1939 inevitable was ignored by the Western media and academia who lauded the great strides in GDP and economic-moral growth that the Nazi regime provided for Germany. There was no private economic growth in the autarchic socialist-Marxist haven of Nazi Germany. The private competitive market, profit-making; international investments and cross-border transactions were eradicated. Hitler like his Russian Fascist cousins, had pretty much succeeded in demolishing capital, markets and private property. Only wealth tolerated by the state was allowed to exist unmolested. Only firms sanctioned by the cult remained 'independent' though they directly served a Nazi ministry. Hitler was as close to achieving the Marxist dream of capital abolition as any radical Communist.

To make all of this happen the Nazis of course became one of the most vicious, ruthless, deranged, violent and immoral cults in history. Marx's prescription to create a communal utopia found its ultimate expression in Hitler's Fascistic radicalism and blood-letting. The death cult of the Nazis combined racial Social Darwinism, with Marxism, supported and expanded by a level of violence rarely seen in history:

“Fascism shares the ..features of totalitarian and socialist states, and carries such ideals to a nationalistic extreme. It is a system of government that exalts the national race or tribe above the individual, and subsumes the person into service for the state. Oppression, brain washing educational programs, media manipulation, mass rallies and marches, and control through various clubs, groups, charities and party organs appealing to age, function or even leisure pursuits, all combine to enforce a general mobilization of citizens, [and militia], to support the state.” http://craigread.com/displayArticle.aspx?contentID=121&subgroupID=17

Hitler's Marxism was little different than Russian Fascism named Communism. Nazi Fascism emphasized race, Russian Fascism emphasized classes. In all other respects they were the same. Anti-Jew pograms were common in Russia, and though the industrial slaughter of Jews and untermenschen was never attempted in Russia, the establishment of Gulags to liquidate enemies of the Marxist state claimed some 30 million lives over 40 years or 5 times the level of the Nazi Holocaust. Far from being 'opposites' the twin bastards of Marxist theology were very much similar.

Cultural Marxism and the Frankfurt School.

Cultural changes usually precede the economic, social and military. Without a 'glue' to hold it together, civilisations die off. In the modern sense, the communal, atheistic, relativist will enter the vacuum. In many ways it is clear that Western society is on the dead-straight march to some variety of statism or grotesque communalism, with relativity and Mother Earth worship as the new centers of state mandated 'faith'. There is of course nothing progressive or intelligent about such offerings. Which is why more people should know about the Frankfurt school and its massive impact on Western culture.

After the Bolshevist takeover in Russia, the Marxist-Communist theorists could not understand why the socialist revolution occurred in Europe's poorest country, when Marxian dialectics demanded that it would begin in the most advanced – and oppressed. In 1922 Lenin organized a meeting in Moscow to discuss how to subvert the Western states and force their societies into a communist revolution. It was decided at this meeting to organize the collapse of Western states from Frankfurt and the 'Frankfurt school' was begun in 1923 at the University of Frankfurt in the Institut für Sozialforschung [or Social Change].

All of the Frankfurt School directors, writers and propagandists were Marxists and openly sympethetic to Russian Fascism, named Communism. The institute was funded by Moscow and wealthy independent Marxists who often worked with or at the school. When Hitler's Marxist based Nazist theology took power in Germany the school was closed for its close ties with the Jewish Bolshevist government in Moscow. Almost all of the original Frankfurt school activists found news jobs and homes in the US at major US universities including, Columbia, Princeton, Brandeis, and California at Berkeley.

In America the Frankfurt school developed its cultural Marxist agenda and in 1950 returned to Frankfurt to issue a 'declaration' on how to change Western states from quasi-capitalist structures into raging riots of impoverishment ripe for a communist takeover. The method to do this was not the Leninist model of a direct coup and military confrontation. The more intelligent and ultimately secure path was to take over the 'commanding heights' of the political-economy. By controlling higher culture, the media, education and the general beliefs held by society, the Frankfurt school was certain, that eventually Western states would implode and change their individualist structures for the communal, replacing freedom with Marxist-Communism.

The first and most important point in the 1950 declaration on ending Western dominance was the school's focus on undermining and eradicating the Judaeo-Christian legacy. Extreme Marxism understands that the roots of Western success lie in the spiritual and practical theologies found in Judeo-Christian culture; and in the painful and often contradictory evolution of Greek-Roman-European traditions of law, culture, technological sophistication; military power and represenative government which best protects freedom and the individual from the state.

The Frankfurt school knew that to annihilate the existing Western domination of the world; and to conspire to turn these nations into Marxist states, the spiritual-rational legacies which had formed Western society needed to be pulled down and replaced by cultural Marxism and relativity – the belief that there in no truth; that all ideas are equal; and that equality and 'justice' controlled by the state elite are the basis for a true utopian society. The Frankfurt school in 1950 and into the 1960s proposed inter-alia the following:


-Destroy the family, which is the ultimate power center of opposition to the government. One method to do this is through enforcing the acceptance of all sexual/familial formations as 'norms', [teaching children in grade 6 about the wonders of homosexuality and showing them gay porn is one example].

-Replacing Christianity with a state inspired faith [Globaloney Warming and Goddess Gaia worship are examples].

-Limiting markets and having all transactions managed by the state.

-Using state power to communalise society by increasing in every area, the unfettered power of government.

-Fusing the media into the state as a propaganda organ.

-Turning education into a tool to brainwash children into supporting state programs [anti-Semiticism, anti-capitalism, Mother Earth worship and support of homosexuality are again clear examples of this].

-Criticizing if not destroying all ideas about individuality, patriotism, and self-worth.

-Isolate opponents of state power, by for instance, making those who pay most of the taxes a minority, and those who receive government hand-outs a majority.


All of the above, advocated as long ago as 1950 by a small band of Marxist missionaries are now firmly in train in the West. The entire Frankfurt program is being adopted in toto by all the nation states of the West. The great Black Jesus himself – the most important man in history – is following almost to the letter the program of the cultural Marxists [with the added focus he has on appeasing his largest supporters, the unions, which is the whole point of the current US health care bill]. Yet no one or very few say anything in opposition to this march towards communism and slavery.

It is obvious that some variety of spiritual belief, in goodness, morality, human individuality, uniqueness, life and social progress is vital for a society to defend itself and grow into a vibrant civilization. If you withdraw the moral, juridical and humanistic personality from society, it will quickly devolve into something barbaric and either overtly or covertly anti-humanist. If the elite of society ignore reality, the world of the 5 senses, innovation, technology, science and math and instead focuses on state power; propaganda; oracular messages; non-literary traditions; superstition; and irrationality – the cultural mutation and its effects on the general society are quickly transmuted and the civilisation becomes imperiled in a matter of generations. Ancient Rome is testimony to that fact. So is our modern world order.

Divine, Kingly and elitist rule, over a feudal body enslaved to the state, is historically the most typical organization of human society. Old paganisms have a terrible habit of reappearing as modern Fascisms. It is only quite recently that the human evolved political-social concepts into a more complicated arrangement dedicated to protecting the individual and elevating freedom above bondage. But that is fast-changing in the West. The migration from freedom back to a Fascist paganism is obvious. As one writer stated when expressing this colossal change in the Western world:

“Western civilization at the present day is passing through a crisis which is essentially different from anything that has been previously experienced. Other societies in the past have changed their social institutions or their religious beliefs under the influence of external forces or the slow development of internal growth. But none, like our own, has ever consciously faced the prospect of a fundamental alteration of the beliefs and institutions on which the whole fabric of social life rests ... Civilization is being uprooted from its foundations in nature and tradition and is being reconstituted in a new organisation which is as artificial and mechanical as a modern factory.” Christopher Dawson. Enquiries into Religion and Culture, p. 259.

Dawson is right. But not many know or care. And that is also how civilizations disappear. Just ask the Germans of 1933. Did they really know what they were doing when they supported the Marxist-Fascist madness of the Bavarian corporal ? Did they forecast the terrible tragedy of World War II ? Did they even care ? Alas the Frankfurt school has been one of the most successful and longest lasting of the Marxist-Fascist attacks on civilization. Its ultimate victory is not a surety, but it grows more purposeful and powerful each and every year. And yet, few know or care.

Lessons from Rome and cultural decline.

Norman Cantor in his opus “The Civilization of the Middle Ages” makes a compelling and thoughtful case for cultural decline, preceding civilizational decline. He was writing about the linkages between ancient Rome and European medieval society. Many of the antecedents of the Catholic Roman era originated from ancient Rome of course. Cantor was inquiring about why an empire of close to 100 million, one of the longest surviving, prosperous and advanced in antiquity, become an over-bearing, statist relic destined to fail which over time would pass into a Roman church dominated Western European empire ? Primus inter pares might be the destruction of high Roman culture.

Many interrelated reasons exist for the inexorable destruction of Rome during the 5th century. The population declined by 20% or more between 250 AD and 400 AD due to disease, plagues and sexually transmitted viruses. The economy shrank as workforces and trade contracted. Technology – never a high priority in a slave-based empire – was stagnant. New processes and methods of production declined markedly after 300 AD.

Without innovation manufacturing of products suffered with local products replacing the international. Distribution and shipping suffered dramatically as well, due to an upsurge in piracy – especially when the Germanic Vandals conquered North Africa and cut off the key trading sea-lanes in the Mediterranean during the 4th century. It is clear as well that agricultural output for a host of reasons – disease, over-farming, a reduction in slave supply, climate changes – dropped off considerably during the 4th and 5th centuries.

As the economy contracted taxes rose. The state needed to increase expenditures on infrastructure, public games and baths, welfare and the military. The burdens of tax and regulation were particularly acute during the 5th century. It is fair to say that many Romans welcomed the end of the empire – as long as the 'barbarians' withdrew the nailed boot of the state from their throats – which is what happened. For many the collapse of Rome was a blessing.

But what caused all of the above ? Political incompetence surely. Moral decay. Leadership vacuums. Cantor makes the important point that nothing in the history of Rome made decline inevitable. The empire had many problems including an impossibly long frontier to defend, hostile tribes to the north, and the Persians to the east. But none of these problems were new or unsolvable. The real issue with Roman decline is the fatuousness of the Roman elite embedded in a serious cultural decline once Constantine the Great, the originator of the empire's state religion of Christianity, passed away in the mid 4th century:

“Because the economic base had seemed perfectly secure, aristocrats were not trained to apply themselves to economic problems. When production, economy, and slave power declined, the Roman forms of life and education were too deeply entrenched to adjust to changed circumstances.” [p. 43]

Roman society was rigidified. This is a key point which is often missed in assessing why the great empire melted away. It was hierarchical, static, pretentious and stood against innovation in any form – economic, military or spiritual. For instance, the Rome-based patrician class never jettisoned their age-old polytheistic paganism for Christianity. This is one of the reasons why Constantine built Constantinople as his Roman-Christian capital. The ossified well-off in Rome had no interest in spiritual debate or inquiry and certainly none in reform.

For Cantor the political – social inadequacies of Rome were reflected in its culture and education. Young noble Romans were never taught science, math, Greek inquiry, or manufacturing. They were taught literary works, memorization, rhetoric and trained in law. For the Roman elite the permanence of Rome was a fact. Rome had always existed and would always persist. Hence the way to power and economic spoil was through the use of words, the law and the power of persuasion in politics enhanced by rhetorical skill. The wealthiest Romans therefore had no idea about innovation; the use of technology to liberate the slave class to more productive work, morality and ethics and the barbarism of some aspects of the Roman world; or simple curiosity about how to make things better. They did not care.

Roman culture was at least in part the pre-cursor of its own failure. The dead hand of the imperial state embodied in the massively destructive civil wars initiated by competing families, clans and mafias are the manifestations of a greedy, self-absorbed, arrogant and largely purblind elite. Taxes, regulations, persecutions and the inability to change or adapt are all hallmarks of the collapsing statist actor. Outside of Roman law, the ideas about freedom, market exchanges, individual conscience, and the use of creativity, and energy to make advances in science, math, technology, and production simply did not exist. Rome was the ultimate communal experiment - run by a mafia elite.

Ancient Rome is not of course modern day America. Americans more than anyone other nationality recognize this simple fact. The differences are too numerous to mention including the democratic pluralism of the US. But some lessons can apply.

Roman society became dumbed-down. Gladiatorial contests, and base primitive circus performances were created to busy and amuse the illiterate mass. A once literary society based on written innovations in poetry, drama and historiography, devolved quickly to an oral tradition signifying a classic decline in intellectual effort and power. Sexual promiscuity was rampant – probably 10 % or more of the empire's women were full or part time prostitutes – and sexual diseases took a significant number of lives each year. Education became a cultural millstone and was non-existent for most people and pathetically irrelevant for the elite. Mores and ethics were not improved or debated.

One can see in reading about Rome that the morass of cultural apathy and the substitution of a culture of indifference, death, sex, and narcissism set the stage for the decline of the Roman world. The rot started at the top and quickly migrated to the general body politic.

Society today is going through the same unsettling changes as those which shook Rome sometime after the period of the Antonines or post 200 AD. Cultural decline in an ancient agricultural-slave empire would take time. In the modern world of mass communications, digitization and immediacy, cultural decline can take just a few generations.

The impacts from cultural decline are not hard to recognize in the modern world. Perhaps the most illuminating aspect of the diseased cultural zeitgeist is the move from a literary-book tradition to an oral-visual display of almost mindless gratification and the dependence on the 'state' to do all things, for all people, all the time. Television, digital media, films, and show productions are all visual and largely oral. Many are also mindless filler. When society moves from a culture which extols the literary to one which worships the oracular and visual, it is a sure sign that a momentous cultural shift has occurred. The same is of course true when the state and the communal supersedes the individual, and freedom. The dead hand of the state is never a warm embrace - it is always a death grip.

At some point the more intelligent Romans knew and even embraced the idea of the empire ending. They could see it in the culture. Maybe in the modern world the same sentiments apply. Perhaps in today's world one can also muse that if culture precedes decline, than how dark will the new 'dark ages' become once the rot of empire leads to its collapse ?

Top Ten 2010 Resolutions to become a valued Marxdroid-Diversity-MSM robot.

To be a good statist-governmental knave you have to follow the patterns of pop-mainstream culture. Cultural patterns determine a lot in the world. When the trend is towards blatant state power; collectivity; pagan irrationality; Mother Earth worship and a hatred of anything to do with markets, freedom, thinking, independence, military preparedness, or civilization – than heck why not join the fun ? Why not engage in self-loathing, historical rewriting and Oprah inspired mindlessness ? Here are the top ten things that any person who is not yet a knuckle dragging ignorant Liberal-Marxist can do to rectify their obscene sense of independence and non-conformity.

Resolutions to join the cultural mainstream:

1. Join a human-hating cult. Death cults are the rage. Islam the 5.000 year old Arabian moon and death cult is now declared to represent 'peace' ! Why not join the fun ? Revisionist historians will soon be saying the same about the Marxist inspired Fascisms of Nazi Germany and Lenin's Soviet model. Hating humans is cool. The more dead humans the more fun life is ! Join now don't wait.

2. Support Mother Earth no matter how irrational the project is. Hating humans is not enough. You need spiritual fulfillment and enlightenment. Mother earth is your Goddess. Worship her. Love her. Do everything for her and if she has pity on you she might not destroy your children's, children's future.

3. Scream and yell everyday during 2010 that Globaloney Warming is real. Even if 875 records for cold temperature are set in December 2009, and even if Co2 which is a natural chemical necessary for life and is only 1 % of all gases in the atmosphere and which has no impact on climate; and even if all the Globaloney Warming claims were based on criminal, fraudulent lying data which benefited the UN, and its supporters; and even if L Ron Gore the eco-whore is a clueless idiot; you must ignore reality, the last ice age, the fact that Co2 levels are at their lowest in millions of years and chant each and every day, “Globaloney Warming is real”. You will feel much better and morally superior.

4. Buy the Mother Earth tshirt, hat and bumper stickers. This will soon be a new law anyways. You have to wear shirts with logos such as “Kill all the children and save Gaia” or hats emblazoned with “Abortion is a Mother Earth right”, or bumper stickers with “The Earth is your mother.” All denote a person of massive intelligence and moderation.

5. Pray to the Prophet Obamed every night. Get down on your knees like a luckless moron and pay homage to the greatest God in history. A man who supersedes Zeus and Christ. The most perfect divine creation. Thank the Great Man for coming to cleanse your sins, and save us all from ourselves.

6. Set up an Obamed shrine in your house. All Western celebrations from Easter, to Thanksgiving, Christmas and national holidays must be recast as incantations to the genius of the 1/3 Black Man from Hawaii who represents the superiority of minority, diversity in the face of white cultural oppression and unmitigated societal Fascism.

7. Watch the Mainstream Media every night and practice your hate scream. Only the BC or BS [pun necessary], networks can be viewed and of course the ultimate pop-stupidity - Oprah. You will believe everything they tell you – and repeat it as fact while flicking your hair. Hating markets, white men, individualism, America, Christians and Jews is mandatory. To confirm your intolerance you must scream for 5 minutes at the TV at the mere mention of any of these words – code of course for white man Fascism. How disgusting it all is.

8. Watch Gay porn. State schools show grade 6 students gay porn in order to sensitize them to sexual 'differences'. Why not you ? Gay porn can be a family event. Forget movie night. Have instead Gay porn night and celebrate with your family the grandeur of anal and lesbian sex. You will feel more sophisticated and cultured for doing so.

9. Kill a Jew or Christian. Arab culture is supreme – the Arabs and Muslims invented civilization or so the really smart people keep saying. So why not join in and get involved ! Arab culture has murdered millions of Jews and Christians in the past 1400 years – why not add to the total ? Jews and Christians are cult worshipping idiots aren't they ? Unlike Muslims, Obama-supporters; Globaloney Warming fanatics; Scientologists or Marxist-Feminists, the Jews and Christians are irrational, devious little demons plotting to run the world ! Kill a few and spill their blood to cleanse the world's pain ! Kill early, kill often !

10. Demand more socialism and higher taxes. Who the hell needs freedom ? What a waste of time. Health care and large swathes of every market are government run or controlled. Government is moral, indifferent, caring, and concerned about you. Government loves you! We need more neo-Platonic love from the state. More love is good. Ergo more government is better. Socialize everything dammit and raise taxes to do so. The really smart people tell us that high taxes and government ownership lower costs, and make everything more efficient. So just do it !

10 easy steps and 10 facile resolutions to join the mainstream idiot parade. Who doesn't want to belong ? Community and mass sentiment are so warm and inviting. Individuals are evil. Markets immoral. All businesses corrupt. Whites racist. Christian and Jews pale in cultured sophistication and intelligence to the Arab moon cult. Science should be irrational paganism. Mother Earth is supreme.

The above program will ensure that you fit right in to the chattering stupidity of pop and mainstream culture – everyone's aspiration of course. Think not. Just act now !

Socialized health care must have consequences.

In rationed socialized systems someone has to lose. By definition socialized medicine means the rationing of supply; the capping of costs and wages; and bureaucratic budget allocation. No sensible person can possibly make the argument that any market – and health services should be a market – can function effectively if it is socialized. Soviet food nationalization and planning resulted in famines; poor product and insufficient supply distributed from government stores to people in waiting lines. Like Sovietization of a human 'right' [food], socialized health care has its waiting lines; its lack of technology and access points; and of course an insufficient supply of professionals and services. It also has high death rates.

The US health care system is not a market system of course. Only 55% of US health spend is private. But that 55 % has resulted in far lower cancer death rates in the US, saving literally hundreds of thousands of lives over the past decade. Conversely in Canada and Britain the cancer death rate is getting worse:

“In 2008, Britain had a cancer death rate 0.25% while the United States had a rate of only 0.18%. The UK cancer death rate was 38% higher than in the United States.

The Guardian, the UK’s left wing daily, estimated that “up to 10,000 people” are dying each year of cancer “because their condition is diagnosed too late, according to research by the government’s director of cancer services.” While many people die because of late detection due to their own negligence, there is no reason to believe this self-neglect is more common in the UK than in the US.

In Canada, the cancer death rate is 16% higher than in the United States.”

http://biggovernment.com/2009/12/02/u-k-cancer-death-rate-is-38-higher-than-in-u-s/

To the crying fawning 'proud' socialist the 16-38% higher death rates for cancer in the UK or Canada is unimportant. It is the 'system', the 'feeling' the emotions of having a communalized health service which is vital. For the lazy Marxist posturing about caring for your 'fellow man' is more important than say taking the intellectual time and effort to recognize that 16-38% more deaths from cancer translates into thousands of dead each year in Canada and the UK.

In fact, if the average person bothered to go through death statistics for cancer – the number one killer in most advanced countries – and add in the other top 2 or 3 diseases which kill humans, you would quickly find out that in Canada for instance, some 20.000 people die each year from higher death rates; waiting lists; mis-diagnoses and mis-treatment. This is two times the American average.

Even the Canadian media when they bother to report facts or reality ignores this death toll by creating virtue out of thousands of body bags:

“In a report on worldwide cancer survival rates, Canada ranked near the top of the 31 countries studied with an estimate five-year survival rate of 82.5 per cent.

For breast cancer, Cuba had the highest survival rates -- another country with free health care. The United States was second, and Canada was third, with 82 per cent of women surviving at least five years.

"Canadians always tend to complain about our health-care system," Dr. Mary Gospodarowicz, a cancer researcher with Toronto's Princess Margaret Hospital, told CTV News. "But this study shows us that in an independent study done by external bodies, the survival of cancer patients in Canada is among the best in the world."

The U.S. has a five-year survival rate in all the cancers studied of 91.9 per cent, while Europe's is much lower at 57.1 per cent. However, survival rates within the U.S. can vary.”

http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20080716/cancer_statistics_080716/20080716/


So the gap is only 10% between the US and Canada – but no critical analysis by this mainstream media source is offered. So how many extra dead in Canada does that make ? Oh that is not important. What is important is that Cuba has the best 'free' system. Notice the insanity of that claim. Cuba has a 'free health care' system. Nothing in life is for free. And if you call the destruction of what was once the 4th richest country in the Western hemisphere and which is now the 2nd poorest, 'free' than sure it is. We should also always believe Cuban propaganda. The likelihood that Cuban cancer death rates are better than the Canadian or American rate, is about the same as the chance that Islamic fascism is caused by poverty. It is utter bunk.

Even the government funded Conference Board of Canada admits that thousands of Canadians die each year just from sub-standard cancer treatment. The death toll runs into the thousands. What is the price tag of that ? What is the 'budget' cost analysis of a life ? What is the morality in laying to rest a human due to waiting lines, no technology, mis-diagnosis and general apathy ?

“One in four Canadians will die of cancer, with a slightly higher risk among men than among women. In 2009, an estimated 171,000 Canadians will be diagnosed and 75,300 will die of cancer—an increase of 4,600 newly diagnosed cases and 1,500 deaths from the year before.

The cost of cancer care also places a heavy burden on the health-care system. One estimate finds that over the next 30 years, 2.4 million workers will get cancer and 872,000 will die from the disease. Meanwhile, cancer will cost the Canadian economy an estimated $177.5 billion in direct health-care costs, $199 billion in corporate profits, $250 billion in taxation revenues, and $543 billion in wage-based productivity.

In 1997, for example, the U.S. and Canada experienced an equal number of deaths due to cancer, at 178 per 100,000 people. But the U.S. rate has since decreased much more quickly, resulting in a considerable gap between Canadian and U.S. cancer mortality rates.”

http://www.conferenceboard.ca/HCP/Details/health/mortality-cancer.aspx

The US health system is not a market system and is rotted and needs real price based consumer reform. Only 55 % of the US system is nominally private. But that 55 % has saved tens of thousands of lives. How many Canadians are dying each year from socialized health care and in the case of cancer – a system which is failing them in all areas of treatment ? It runs into the many thousands probably close to 10.000 a year. But the death rate is never discussed, never broached in socialist countries. People die every day from the system's inadequacies yet the theology of socialism and the myths of a 'caring governmental system' are more important to uphold than truth, reality and human life.

US Health Care is not a market.

In Canada government health care spending is about $2,120 USD per person while in the United States government spending is about $2,724 per capita. In other words US governments spend more than Canadian – it is a government controlled public good. It is a hoary ugly myth that the US health system is a market. Only 55 % of US health spend is private and that portion is shrinking. In Canada it is 30% and growing. Yet a key difference never muted by socialists, Obamed-cult members; or unions who desire the radical socialization of what remains of the US health market is that death rates in Canada for cancer – the greatest killer in a modern society – are 25 % above US levels. This death rate is telling you something.

Back in the days of hippies, pipe's and war protests, the 1970 levels of health spend between Canada and the US were equal. In 1970 the Canadian spend on health as a percentage of GDP was 7.1 %. In the US it was 7.6%. Since then there has been an explosion in spending in both countries as ageing, demands for technology and attempts to 'cure' cancer and other diseases have resulted in 11% of GDP being spent in Canada on health, and close to 19% in the US.

The discrepancy between the two countries is attributable mostly to three factors; 1) Greater technology development and access in the US; 2) Higher per capita US spend on private insurance plans including drug benefits and 3) Spiraling law suits in the US against medical clinics and doctors and the resultant increase in patient premium costs. None of the factors which have driven up US medical costs are market based. In fact they are government created.

The US has no real market in health care. There is no true policy competition with every state acceding to the insurance lobby, making 'core' policies a legal requirement and limiting policy offerings. This drives up costs to consumers and fattens the profits of the insurance firms. There is also no portability between jobs or across state lines. This is dysfunctional. To bring down costs you need to have price competition open across state boundaries.

For example a 30 year old healthy male in Chicago can only buy a policy which includes pregnancy coverage. He might be excused for not wanting this and deciding that his money is best spent elsewhere. He might also decide that since he will change jobs in the near future and he can't take his insurance policy with him, it makes little sense to have comprehensive health coverage even though he can well afford it. Hence the hue and cry for the 'un-insured' [a simpleton populist claim]. Under US law all citizens have a right to access hospital care and get taken care of. Illegals, the poor and the old without insurance policies will be serviced even without payment. This puts a huge burden on the system. But it is a manifestation of government interference not a feckless 'market'.

Some 90% of Americans belong in privately insured plans with some form of managed care. In this model insurance companies following government rules and regulations, try to tightly control patients' health care to reduce costs, by for example, demanding a second opinion before expensive treatments, or by denying coverage for treatments not considered worth their cost or deemed frivolous or not covered directly by the policy. There is nothing wrong with this. Insurance firms may also deny treatment if the patient lied about a pre-existing condition. This is a contractual issue and one which is contentious and which could be solved if there existed a market for people with existing conditions.

The scope for insurance fraud – from both sides of supply and the consumer - is therefore quite large, all thanks to government interference. In a truly functioning market there would be policies, premiums and different price points to fit all needs and requirements. If pre-existing conditions were a 'market' you can bet that an enterprising firm, able to manage its cost structure properly, would provide policy coverage. The profits would be too tempting to ignore. De-regulated eye-care is an example. In the 1970s eye care was liberated from government control. Tens of thousands of new jobs have been created, access points now flourish and we have seen a radical reduction in price for all varieties, styles and power of eye care, lenses and glasses. The same would be true for health care de-regulation.

The current US health care system is not a market – it is a government distorted nightmare. Consider this:

-$150 billion per annum fraud exists in the socialized programs of US Medicare and Medicaid.

-Lifestyle choices of smoking, drinking and non-exercise are increasingly unpunished as the costs for Medicaid and Medicare explode. This means that people can abuse their minds and bodies and expect others to pay for it. In the private insurance market this is reflected in the escalation of premiums for all consumers – not just the ones who engage in self-abuse. Another example of government distorted quackery.

-Unlimited emergency room access for illegals in the US [what part about 'illegal' don't Leftards understand ?] which costs at least $40 billion per year in hospital costs.

-US administrative costs are a remarkable 31% of total costs [akin to your typical large bloated corporation]. In Canada it is almost half that level – 17%. Tort suits, government demanded paper work and unlimited levels of bureaucratic entanglement ensue an administrative disaster.

-Governments price cap drugs to seniors further distorting real prices and ensuring future health care deficits of $70 billion per annum [the drugs are subsidized and that subsidy has to be paid by someone].

US health care does need reform. But not socialization which the Obamed-cult and its media abettors term 'reform'. It is a deform. Everything which ails the US health system is due to government. So the obvious answer is yes – more government ! Medicaid and Medicare are bankrupt. Yet the Obamed's want to extend this fraudulent disaster to the entire health market and claim that costs will come down. Costs can't come down until you have a functioning market based on prices.

But what about the poor the socialists would wail ? For the 5 to 8 % of Americans who are poor it would be cheaper and more intelligent to literally walk over to the poor person's house and hand them a cheque for health care coverage. That would cost roughly $42 billion per year, the least distortive and most efficient solution. Under a real market system that would likely be unnecessary but it certainly is more efficacious than spending an extra $1 Trillion per annum on Obamed socialized nonsense.

It is clear that socialized medicine has many demerits including higher death rates, rationing, no technology, no access, fewer doctors and too few nurses. If you want to socialize health care, you might as well do it for food, shoes, water, and hair cuts. After all why should a price competitive market work in food or shoes – if it can't or won't in health care ?

The Globaloney Death Cult – Animism destroying the human.

Gaia worship is nothing new. Organizing society around appeasing Earth Gods is far older than celestial worship and predates by almost 2 million years forms of monotheism. What is not understood in the modern world is that historically and ineluctably Gaia worship, which comes from Animism, always leads to a death cult – to the culling of humans, sacrifices and destruction of the newly born. The Globaloney Warming cult dedicated to eradicating carbon from the world would be no different. It is an expression of the hatred of the human. It has nothing to do with saving the environment.

Animism is a belief that Mother Earth and all her various objects have souls, spirits, intelligence and a life-force: “....all things in the universe are invested with a life force, soul or mind inherently. It is an important constituent of primitive religions. It appears commonly in occult and spiritism circles (Dictionary of Cults, Sects, Religions, and the Occult, p. 22).” Mother Earth worship is Animist in the sense that the Earth itself is given anthropomorphic features as a caring, nurturing Mother. All objects – animate or inanimate – residing within Mother Earth's living space, are at least equal to, if not superior to, the human.

Gaia worship premised on pagan Animism is the highest form of post-modern relativity in which all aspects of reality are either equal or unknown thereby making all actions relatively the same in importance.

In the ancient world Gaia-Animist belief led to the slaughter of humans. Death cults grew out of this 'relativist' devotion and obsession with the Earth Mother. It is perhaps understandable that in a pre-modern world the destruction of human life to satiate a Mother Earth might be regarded as 'logical' or necessary. The Arab death cult for instance, which grew into Islam, for 5.000 years soaked the Earth with the blood of victims – children, women, prisoners, and slaves – or anyone who was insufficiently devoted to the worship of the moon God, and who might imperil the lives of those dependent on natural earthly cycles of food, weather and good fortune.

The Roman empire was spread in part to destroy Gaia and Animist belief. One of the animating features so to speak of Roman imperialism, was the disgust that Romans had for the human slaughter embedded in the practices of Animist-Gaia death cults. It was Rome's civilizing mission to promote human life and defend the innocent.

The Etruscans with an advanced civilization in modern Tuscany, were famous for instance for their death cult. It was the Etruscans who gave the Romans the technology of iron, mining, road building, charioteering, and water and sewage systems; but who nonetheless, in spite of their superbly advanced society, engaged in the culling of the human herd. Ritualized slaughters of infants, women, and prisoners were made to appease the various Earth and Animist Gods of the Etruscan pantheon. Rome to the south of Etruria, viewed the eradication of such barbarism as a moral imperative and a call to Roman unity in the face of such anti-humanist murder. The call to war was as much moral as economic or military.

The Roman wars with Carthage were also conflicts between the life-cult of Rome, and the Orientalist death cult of Carthage. The enormously costly three Punic wars, ending with the final annihilation of Carthage in 148 B.C., were 'sold' to the Roman people not just as the inevitable conflict between rival superpowers in the Western Mediterranean, but also to end the Animist-Gaia slaughter of innocents. Like the Etruscans, the Carthaginians, who were originally Phoenician or mixed Greeks from Lebanon, engaged in child sacrifices to appease various Animistic Gods. The dens of slaughter have been excavated in parts of modern day Tunisia. Thousands of children were purportedly killed each year at various festivals and their blood soaked the once fertile earth of North Africa. All to satiate Mother Earth.

One of the reasons why the Romans hunted the Druids to extinction in England and Wales was the impulse and necessity of ending Druidic human sacrifice. The Druids were Animist priests who saw a God in every rock and tree and believed that Mother Earth directly nurtured all objects. To feed and fertilize the great Mother, masses of humans were murdered and their blood emptied onto the soil.

Celtic paganisms throughout France, Germany and Spain met similar fates when confronted by Roman arms. The hatred of human life, mingled with earth based superstition appalled Roman rationality and humanism. The high priestly class was effaced and Roman culture imposed.

Likewise with the Oracle of Delphi in Greece – the ultimate symbol of Mother Earth worship. This fraud was thankfully eradicated by the Romans in the first century AD, after 1700 years of political, economic and spiritual domination. The Oracle did not directly engage in human sacrifice but it did demand obeisance to the sayings of Mother Earth, translated by priestesses who were stoned on datura leaves and the effluence of sulfur and carbon dioxide emitting from a crevice in an area of geothermal activity. It was simply an insidious cult of political control.

Globaloney Warming or Climate Change, or whatever moniker the little minds want to come up with, is nothing new. It is an ancient form of control. It is viciously anti-humanist. If imposed on the populations of this planet, it will lead to a death cult. Abortions, one-child only policies, euthanasia for the old and sick, the management of populations will result. And this time there will be no Roman empire to defend life and spread civilization.

CAIR – the front for radical Islam in America.

CAIR is a front for radical Islam engaged in anti-constitutional actions. Any serious study of CAIR will reveal that its links to Hamas, Palestinian Jihad, Al Qaeda and other Muslim Fascist groups are strong and growing. Yet as one would expect, the media, the academics, the politicians and associated Leftards, miraculously portray CAIR as an innocent group fighting for 'Arab and Muslim' rights against the intolerance of Anglo-Saxon Jewish culture. Due to this politically-correct mindlessness, CAIR is allowed to foment local and national jihad, including the creation of radical Muslim centers, training camps and expositions on how to kill the infidel.

CAIR was started in 1993 by Ibrahim Hooper and Omar Achmed both who were Hamas supporter's. CAIR now has no more than 2000 members in the USA but holds a disportionate influence with the US media usually having their officials interviewed to represent 'Muslim opinion'. Most 'mainstream' Muslims would not agree with CAIR's radical Islamic links and promotion of terror – both of which are detailed in a court case brought against CAIR by the FBI from 2004 to 2008 which proved conclusively that CAIR was funded by radical Saudi, Palestinian, Iranian, Libyan and other terror based money. It is also promoting radical US based Jihad; suicide attacks; anti-Semiticism and the rather bizarre notion of turning the US Republic into a Muslim Caliphate. None of this is reported in the mainstream media.

The information on CAIR's activities are not hard to find. Good recent sources on CAIR and its radical Islamic Fascism include any writings or books by Steve Emerson a former FBI agent who specialized in Islamic terrorism and is now a director at IPT [Investigative Project on Terrorism ;http://www.investigativeproject.org/cases.php along with “Inside the Muslim Mafia” written by former Arab linguist Special Agent P. David Gaubatz and Stanford media fellow and journalist Paul Sperry. Emerson and “Inside the Muslim Mafia” are key starting points for anyone who wants to learn more about the unbridled radicalism and subversive jihad being perpetrated by CAIR.

Along with the above the website http://www.anti-cair-net.org/ is also an excellent compendium of valuable information which will outline the history and sordid detail of America's pre-eminent Arab-Islamic Fascist front. Frontpagemag.com and this article here http://97.74.65.51/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=7803 summarize quite clearly the links between CAIR and Muslim terrorist groups. There is no doubt that CAIR is simply a front for radical Islam receiving money from and laundering money for Islamic terror organizations.

As the “Muslim Mafia” outlines CAIR's activities include the following illegal actions:

-Receiving millions from Hamas, the Saudis and a wide variety of Fascist Muslim organizations since its inception.

-Its board had a meeting with an Al Qaeda terrorist months before he was convicted of attempting to assassinate than President G.W. Bush.

-CAIR is now attempting to get the Pakistani master-mind of the Mumbai bombings which killed 150 people out of jail.

-A board member has been advocating radical Uzi-Jihad on American streets.

-CAIR promotes in its literature that Muslim men need to beat their wives lightly.

-CAIR is meeting regularly with Muslim Congressmen Larry Ellison – who is the lone US congressional Muslim – to plot out how to increase the Muslim presence on Capitol Hill to 15 by the next election.

-Political lobbying to portray Muslims as a victim group is incessant, which is in direct violation of its tax-exempt status as a non-political organization.

-CAIR has teamed up with rich Saudi investors to buy its headquarters in downtown Washington DC along with many other parcels of DC land.

-CAIR regularly sues any journalist, website or author which produces material critical of CAIR or Islam.

In spite of all this the mindlessness of the politically-correct multi-cult crowd continues apace. According to Steve Emerson at IPT, State Department Secretary Hillary Clinton has made it mandatory that CAIR be included on all conference calls about the Middle East. CAIR officials have traveled with State Department officials on overseas trips to Israel and Darfur – this is akin to having neo-Nazis traipse to Jerusalem to study the Zionists. The Department of Homeland Security is briefed and educated by CAIR on Islam – about as intelligent as having Soviet spies brief the CIA during the Cold War. NPR, NBC, the New York Times and the Liberal media routinely interview CAIR as if it were a non-aligned group of senior citizens concerned about law and order.

CAIR should be shut down. The US cannot afford a 5th column of radical Islam. As well 'moderate' Muslims, which we hear so much about, need to condemn CAIR's links to radical Fascism and demand its abolition. If so-called mainstream Muslims want to demonstrate their pro-Western, orthodox Liberal credentials, they can do no better than in advocating the eradication of a pro-Islamic terror organization which portrays itself – abetted by a sympathetic and stupid media – as the voice of Muslim moderation.

Muslims take-over Bethlehem

When Christians soon become extinct in the supposed-birthplace of Christ the media will of course rejoice. Academics will pen updated theories about Muslim dialectical power, resplendent in conquering faith. Schools will teach impressionable minds that Bethlehem was always Muslim and that the Jew Christ was anyways an interloper and early exponent of Judeo-Christian imperialism. Arabs will view the take-over as further support to the claims of the Koran and Mohammed that Islam will dominate all the capitals of the infidels.

It is momentous what is happening in Israel. Christians are literally being effaced from places where they have dwelt for 2.000 years. Christ was of course born in Nazareth in Galilee, today a town of 40.000 with about 7% of the population being Christian. [Even the Romans called Christ the preacher from Galilee]. Bethlehem is the home of King David – he the unifier and expander of the first real Israelite empire. Jewish lore has it that the second Messiah would come from Bethlehem and the house of David. Hence the conflation in Jewish-Christian mythology of Christ's birth in the town of David. He was born 50 miles north, but messianic claims need to be changed to fit the prophecies, no matter how apocryphal.

In any event what we are witnessing today is the usual process of Arab expansion and Muslim intolerance. 50 years ago Bethlehem was 80% Christian. Today that number is less than 20%. In Christendom's second holiest city in Israel, the Christian presence will soon be eclipsed and replaced by that of the Arab and Muslim. Soon to follow – as it always does – will be the desecration and then the destruction of Christian artefacts including churches and sites dedicated to the life of Christ:

“Always a minority religion among the predominantly Muslim Palestinians, Christians are, Mr. Qumsieh says, "melting away," even in Bethlehem. While they represented about 80% of the city's population 60 years ago, their numbers are now down to about 20%, a result not just of Muslims' higher birth rates but also widespread Christian emigration. "Our future as a Christian community here is gloomy," Mr. Qumsieh says.” http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704304504574610022765965390.html

Muslim suicide bombers have been active in Bethlehem. Muslims routinely clash with Christian worshippers. Muslims are using intimidation and force to expel Christians from the city. It is the age-old story of brutal bullying and dogmatic hate. Muslims are interested only in domination and control. Multi-cult pieties about inter-faith love and understanding mean nothing to them.

But the Western media and the educational systems ignore such realities. The situation would be far worse if the Israelis had not set up a security barrier. The barrier is the only sure protection that the Christians have from Muslim predations. For instance the sacred Church of the Nativity, which Palestinian gunmen stormed and defaced in 2002 apparently 'escaping' from Israeli defense forces, is now once again welcoming tourists – all thanks to the security barrier.

It is the irony of this disaster which is perplexing. Here we have Christians expelled from the incorrectly attributed birth-place of their most important leader, by the intolerant pagan Fascism of the Arab-Muslim moon cult. Yet no one discusses it. It would be as is Jews and Christians had forced Muslims to evacuate all of East Jerusalem through suicide bombers, terror, violence and open force. The world would hardly be quiet about such an event. Yet the silence around the destruction of Christians and their culture in Bethlehem is deafening.

Appeasement, politically correct Fascism, ignoring the obvious, embracing the absurd, tolerating the violent – none of these denote maturity, intelligence or nuanced perspective. They are the actions of the cowardly, the ignorant, the denuded and the dumb. So it goes yet again with yet another example of Muslim intolerance – and not a whisper anywhere about it.

Worse than forecasted: The Black Jesus after one year.

The true blue, Marxist radical, the Black Jesus or according to the media, the most important man or demi-god in history is of course a laughingstock. It is no wonder that the wonder-boy now has the worst poll ratings after one year, in US Presidential history. The man, his mafia-like administration, his corruption, his narcissism, his obvious lack of intellectual depth and intelligence, and his reflexive anti-Americanism and Marxist groveling; are sure to mark this entire four year period as a low point in US administrative history. The Black Jesus will rank with Taft, FDR, Hoover, and Jimmy Carter as amongst the worst domestic Presidents in history. The first year confirms that pre-election prediction that so many 'right wing extremists' forecasted. This man is a joke.

Such an assessment is rooted in black and white reality. And it does not negate the nefarious policies that Bush and co. undertook over 8 years which castrated American financial health and economic dynamism. Bush's policies were deleterious – easy money, zero interest rates for too long, massive spending and the almost doubling of the US national debt from $5.3 Trillion to $9.8 Trillion. A weak US dollar policy and the 40% increase in national welfare spending guarantees that domestically Bush will be regarded historically as one of the most dilettantish and irresponsible big government 'New Dealers' – to be ranked with FDR and LBJ in the pantheon of socialistic destruction.

So what then of the Black Jesus ? He is taking Bush's policies and improving on worsening them. Bush-Bama and Hoover-FDR.

The US national debt will double again in 4 years to some $19 Trillion. With bankruptcy looming in Medicaid and Medicare and Social Security, the US will at some point be technically insolvent.

Government debt issuance's will have to provide a markedly higher premium do this risk – making it even more difficult for the US to fund its negatives savings flows and deficits.

Inflation due to a lax monetary policy, zero interest rates and a trebling of the money supply is a future surety – considerably lowering living standards and the US dollar.

Socialized Health Care in some form is a fait accompli which will wipe out the US health industry, 15 % of GDP; and any and all innovation in the health-pharma sector costing lives and literally millions of jobs – not to mention lives since all socialized systems of health by their very nature must ration costs and by default kill people.

Government expansion and spending has only worsened employment and economic prospects and the US government seems quite willing and eager to keep equity in car firms; banks; insurance companies and soon health care firms. The unions will run riot and increase their membership by millions further rigidifying and distorting the US economy.

The current stock market rally from DOW 6500 to 10500 is a credit inflation bubble. It will pop like earlier bubbles. And who will the MIMH blame for that ? Wall Street ? Markets ? Whites ? Bush ?

Then we have the Great Man's appeasement of Islam; his indifference to winning in Afghanistan [which he called the necessary war and now calls it Bush's war]; his obvious anti-Americanism; and his infatuation with Globaloney Warming – the greatest Marxist and redistributive scheme of fraud in history.

No wonder this man is hated. He entire ethos is against the individual; against markets; against competition and against innovation. He is a hard core radical socialist and cultural Marxist, backed by union power and financial industry money who covets and demands the expansion of government power everywhere all the time.

In reading US history two epochs come to mind when regarding the first year of the Great Man's administration so beloved by Marxist-Socialists and Oprah-NBC watchers.

The first is the disastrous government involvement in 1930 which created the Great Depression. Government mis-management in both fiscal and monetary policy manufactured a depression from what should have been a sharp, short and necessary capital deflationary correction. There was no need for the massive statism of Hoover and FDR.

Doubling tax revenues; engaging in huge social engineering projects like the Hoover Dam, or the Tennessee Valley Authority which cost billions of dollars [a lot of money in the 1930s]; not allowing the private sector to build out the road, riverine, power and energy infrastructures; raising regulations and tariffs; and doubling the national debt in a matter of years – all was unnecessary.

Married to a restrictive monetary policy with high interest rates, contracted money supply and the maintenance of laws which forced one branch banks to close [many states only allowed one branch per bank making it impossible for a bank to effectively spread out its risk to many economic sectors]; the US economy went from a troubling recession into the collapse of a depression.

The second, is the media and rhetorical distortions and mythologies which created JFK. The lies of the corrupted East Coast media and its benefactors; turned a family clan's naked pursuit of power, which included dealing with the mafia, thuggery, intimidation, vote-rigging, vote-buying, political and media bribery, and the liberal usage of money to crush dissent; into a cult of worldly saintliness and intellectual greatness.

Both of the above observations apply to the Black Jesus. Destructive economic mis-management and the corruption of the East media and elite in assigning to a corrupt Chicago-crat politician the aura of saint-hood and intellectual gravitas.

At the Brookings Institute on December 8 2009 the MIMH gave this typically inane comment about his economic policy:

"Even as we have had to spend our way out of this recession in the near term, we have begun to make the hard choices necessary to get our country on a more stable fiscal footing in the long run." [President Barack Obama December 8, 2009]


That statement is a mash of nonsense and unintelligible gibberish. You are in debt and bankrupt, so you spend more to get on a 'stable fiscal footing'? Is this man insane ? How about reducing spending, reducing taxes, reducing regulation and stimulating the supply of capital and jobs ? How about real interest rates of 3 % or more; a strong US dollar policy and the rejection of Marxist fads and cults like Globaloney Warming ? How about real Health Care reform such as tort reform; policy competition across states; and portability ? [If you are worried about the poor not being insured it would be smarter and cheaper to walk over to their home and hand them a cheque to cover their health insurance costs]

The Black Jesus is not the MIMH. He is a colossal fraud and disaster. His radical Marxism will end up destroying much of what makes the US unique. And that will be a signal failure and loss for the entire world.

The stock market crash of 1929 – caused by liquidity and government.

There are many myths about the stock market crash of 1929 – all them taught and believed in by the well informed media and those profound thinkers in public education. The crash of October 29 only reset stock levels back to 1928 – hardly a meltdown. But more importantly the causes of the 1929 credit and stock crisis originated with government. They had little to do with 'markets'.

The 1920's under President Coolidge were the most dynamic decade probably in US history – and the most laissez-faire. More wealth was created for more people in those 10 years than in any other community, at any other time in history. Real per-capita income went from $500 in 1920 to over $700 by 1928. National income rose from $59 billion to $88 billion during the same period – real gains of over 40% in just 8 years.

Appliances and inventions to simply life and improve entertainment abounded. Cars became the new normal. An entire nexus of industry around the car including roads, construction, restaurants grew apace creating jobs and wealth. The US middle class rose to over 100 million people whose standard of living was 30 years ahead of the European. The 1920s boom was uneven, but spectacular dismaying snobs like F Scott Fitzgerald who could not stand the dirty mass enjoying what only the rich had previously owned.

But as with any good party the hangover from the 1920s bash was terrible. Though the wealth and asset creation was real and in many ways permanent there were two terrible flaws with the rampant growth of the 1920s. First, US industry was protected by high tariffs giving future governments a platform to further raise tariffs and keep out cheaper and better products. Second, the US financial system was awash in liquidity, supported by near zero interest rates. Both of these would guarantee that Coolidge's statement to his daughter that 'a depression is coming', would be realized.

The US raised tariffs twice which distorted trade patterns and de-stabilized markets. The first was in 1922 with the Ford-McCumber tariff and than again in 1930 with the execrable Smoot-Hawley act which was the largest tariff protectionism in history. World commerce and America's own economy suffered greatly under these two political acts designed to appease higher wage workers and voters in the US, and earn the political support of a variety of large and rather inefficient businesses and industries.

Both acts guaranteed a loss of trade and resultant corporate profits and negatively impacted stock markets. The 'crash' of 1929 was in part a market response to the Smoot Hawley proposal, than making its way through Congress. The markets rightly sold off in advance, knowing that the bill's passage would herald the end of trade and corporate profitability and would be matched by tax increases and massive spending. The market was of course right.

What guaranteed the so-called crash was the advent of liquidity tied to poor fiscal policy embedded in tariffs and with the election of Hoover the social engineering demi-god of US politics as President in 1928, the nefarious impact of massive state intervention. The combination was inexorable and disastrous. But it was US liquidity of course which dramatically fed a stock market bubble during the 1920s.

The US government fed the banking system an increase in money supply as 'aggregate demand' from growing GDP created an appetite for US greenbacks. This increase in money supply was somewhat more than warranted and helped fuel the rise of loans and investments – and the creation of investment trusts dedicated to stock purchasing. These trusts were the harbingers of the larger institutions we know today, including hedge funds and mutual funds. The trusts also benefited from the first mass democratic interest in stocks – by 1929 some 40 % of Americans had stock investments.

Added to this money supply increase was the low to zero interest rate policy of the Coolidge administration. As one could easily forecast, near zero rates generated a plethora of loans and various schemes where a poor man of modest means could borrow money. A lot of this borrowed money found its way into Wall Street. Investment trusts and brokers invented the 'margin account' during the 1920s, wherein a person could put down less than 10 % of the value of the stock purchase in cash and borrow the rest. It was highly imprudent but very popular.

The combination of all of these factors created a deluge of capital which drove up stock prices. Keep in mind that during the 1920s there were far fewer listed stocks than today. The limited opportunities attracted excess cash and drove up Price-Earnings ratios to the highest on record. Before 1929 some stocks were trading at over 50 times P-E – the historical average is 16. A fall was easily forecasted. All that was necessary was a push – and that came from Hoover's social engineering project replete with taxes, spending and higher tariffs.

The stock market did not really crash in October 1929. The index peaked before Monday October 21 at 452. As the excess credit inflation started to burst, margin calls went out – in effect trusts and brokers calling in leveraged loans. Since few had cash on hand it generated a panic. Selling commenced and bankruptcies followed. After 4 weeks, the index stood at 224 – or the same level as December 1928. A sharp and rational correction to be sure but hardly a disaster. By December 1929 the market had stabilized. Much wealth had been destroyed - but much wealth had also been created during the bubble years preceding October 1929.

If prudent fiscal and monetary policy had been followed in 1930 the 'depression' never would have occurred, and the sharp credit deflation which was so necessary and vital, would have corrected itself by the end of 1930. Instead the politicians became further involved. Their credit inflation during the 1920s had caused a stock market excess and correction. Now improvident social engineering combined with massive taxation and spending, along with far too high interest rates guaranteed a sharp contraction in capital, markets and industry. Yet today the media, and the social engineers at public schools blame the events of October 1929 and beyond, on the 'markets'.

What is certain is that easy money and credit expansion usually end poorly. The last decade also proves that point. Yet today the same policies which caused the stock bubble of the 1920s and the 2000s is still in train. So when will the next crisis hit and how hard will it be ?

Destroying the Nation State and the modern world – one green step at a time.

There is no precedence in history for the plans now in train to cede ever more sovereignty by the nation state to the corruptocracy of the United Nations – one little Mother Earth step at a time. Every single developed nation state is now rife with leaders who for various reasons, deem it politically expedient to hand over national autonomy to one of the most dangerous, anti-Western, anti-reality and Marxist organizations in history. Mother Earth, climate change, Globaloney Warming, the children's future – all used as excuses, impetus, or moral factors in transferring the power over national processes, laws, and industrialization, to an unelected, unaccountable and entirely nefarious mafia. These politicians and their abettors should be in jail – for treason, for breaking the constitution and for being stupid.

The nation state has many flaws. But the liberals, socialists, and internationalists who hate capitalism, capital, markets and individual choice are wrong about one of its supposedly chief demerits. The nation state is not an impediment to international cooperation. In fact it is the only rational, and moral organization, in which differing states, tribes and cultures can interact. It is also the only form of protection for the same. Without a stable, strong and legal state, there is anarchy [see Africa]. Without the state, there would be totalitarianism either somewhat benign [see Europe]; or one more prone to violence [see the Chinese empire].

In the utopian world of the communist-globalist, people such as Bill Clinton chatter airily on about the post-modern future of mankind, a federation not of states but just of people. For Clinton and other near-billionaires such intellectual trash presents itself easily in speeches, and on the media rubber chicken circuit, where any passing reference to hating America, markets, or the amoral system of capital accumulation is applauded. But Clinton and the Globalists who include the UN autocracy, Maurice Strong, the carbon Fascists such as L Ron Gore, or the Globaloney Warming cultists; are entirely mistaken.

The modern world political-economy was only created through the competitive system of states where four factors were allowed to interact:

1. Economic competition which forces states to impose reasonable laws, taxes and regulation.
2. The maintenance of private property and wealth accretion where the individual, including legally incorporated firms and stock structures, can manufacture and keep profits.
3. Military and domestic police strength where peace, stability and order could in some way be guaranteed which should – all things considered – spur risk taking, innovation and cultural advancement. Without peace, social and economic progress is difficult.
4. The creation of a local culture which satisfies local tastes. This is significant. There is no global culture, just like there is no global climate. One doubts very much that Slavs want to live as Chinese, or Indians as Peruvians.

These are simply black and white facts. The rise of Europe to dominate the world can be seen in the nexus of the above four factors. Without nation state competition and the ability of states to protect their populations from international predators and domestic malcontents, the modern world would never have been created. Without the ability to adapt Judeo-Christian ideals to local cultural tastes and attitudes, the variegated and powerful forces which allowed local states to excel, never would have taken place. Far from abetting war, the nation state is the only guarantor against anarchic war. There is no credible argument which can deny this.

The entire corpus of Western achievement – the Medieval economic and agricultural revolution; the invention of modern accounting and management; the rational Enlightenment; the Renaissance; industrial 'Fordism'; and the knowledge explosion; are only possible within a competitive nation state structure. War is alas, as Churchill rightly commented, 'the natural preoccupation of mankind'. Only the strength of the nation state allows populations, cultures and innovation to survive and thrive.

This then highlights the main problem with the Globalist agenda. Premised on a cult of irrationality the UN, Bill Clinton, Maurice Strong, and the servants of Mother Earth, are proposing what doesn't work and which never would have allowed them to exist or to make money – namely the eradication of the nation state and the imposition of impersonal transnational governance. None of it makes any sense.

What purpose does it serve to transfer to the UN control over your energy processes and means of production ? Will all states do so equally ? How does one manage all the nation states involved so everything is the same everywhere and fair ? Will it stop war ? Will the new Globalism stop Islamic Fascism or the Arab murder of Jews ? Does castrating the modern world really help the children's future ? Will the climate actually benefit if you delimit industrial activity ? What about national laws and constitutions ? Are they relevant ?

There is no deep thinking in the process of Globalism. It is just fantasy and convenient speech making. Clinton et al can't answer even the most basic questions about Globalism. There is no serious consideration about what it will do to the nation state, its population or to the modern world political – economy. The world would be inherently far worse off under Globalism, than it is today. There would actually be more war; more environmental destruction; more poverty and more death. Only the nation state and its unique actor-will, in which it can act, form alliances or do what it deems necessary, prevents anarchy.

International institutions do have a limited role to play in the world's political-economy. The key word is limited. They can never, and should never, transcend local laws and constitutions. Only the nation state can protect property, rights and freedom.

The UN is no protector of rights and democracy. It is a Marxist cabal controlled by the Third World and driven by the Arab-Muslim bloc. It has no claim to higher morality or efficacy [see the $100 billion Iraqi Oil for Food scam for more detail]. Transnational agreements in the areas of military, trade, and human rights protection do make sense. What does not make sense is destroying the very structure of progress in the name of an irrational eco-cult dedicated to world domination.

Yet that is what we are now facing – one slow greenist step at a time. Making the state inconsequential. It is utter madness.

Gaia Paganism – another ideology dedicated to destroying capitalism.

Copenfrauden 2009, Kyoto 1997, Rio 1992 – the linkages are not hard to grasp. The UN abetted by Gaia worship in the form of Globaloney Warming, the theology of choice, convenience and irrationality, is striding one step at a time towards World Socialist governance. The UN is thus the legacy successor of German Marxism or Nazism, Mussolini's Roman Socialism, and Russian Communal Fascism. UNO Gaia socialism is the contemporary companion of Castroism, Chavezism and the deleterious aspects of Chinese Communism. UN Gaia socialism is dedicated of course, to the eradication of Western power.

Marxist theory deplores money and private markets. Marxists support the same – for the mass. The elite of course will gorge themselves at the expense of the untutored slaving peasantry. Marxism is little more than quack Feudalism, with some tortured moronic theories giving a pastiche of 'scientific rationality' to the insane idea of progressive-stage theory dialecticism. Only an infantile is attracted to Marxism. Only a power-mongering predator is fascinated by its use to control the mass.

As Marx himself stated, “All social rules and all relations between individuals are eroded by a cash economy, avarice drags Pluto himself out of the bowels of the earth.” This phrase is the essence of what the UN, under its irrational Gaia cult hopes to achieve. Manage all individual relations. Have the state control as much of the cash making process as possible. Keep Pluto and the legions of capital creating individuals submerged in the under-world. Make the nation state and all transnational processes subservient to the UN. It is frightening – writing in 2006 the facts of Gaia Socialism were just as obvious then as they are now:

“Eco-fascism is another marxist cabal, another way to control, regulate, tax and strike fear into populations. Only the elite through the new high priests of the Goddess Gaia club can possibly lead us to salvation. In philosophical terms eco-fascism embedded in ‘Climate Change’ is a means to punish the capitalist part of the world and instill the reordering of power within the world system with a focus on a more equitable, longer-term minded and humanistic attempt to build societies in ‘harmony with our natural biosphere’. Eco-fascism is in essence just another marxist attempt, and an intellectually barren one at that, to alter the world’s power hierarchy and moral alignment by killing off the modern capitalist world.” http://www.craigread.com/displayArticle.aspx?contentID=432&subgroupID=14

Not much has changed in almost 4 years. Eco-Fascism or Gaia Socialism is the logical resting place of the disaffected Marxists, Communists, Capital-haters, and assorted Eco-freaks. It has always been so. It was true 4 years ago, and it will be true 40 years hence.

Socialists, Fascists, modern Liberals, 'progressives', anti-Semites, and anti-Americans were in a mournful state post 1989. Their great icon Russian Fascism named Communism, had imploded. With only 30-40 million dead as the price of socialist utopia, the true-believers needed something else to subscribe to, another violent, anti-human ideology which was dedicated to opposing the monstrosity of capital, markets and individuality. A Brave New World needed to be created on the death, blood and destruction of the old. Their beacon was Mother Earth worship – a monstrous pygmy of an ideology, soaked in hate, irrationality, lies and violence.

The evil embedded in Gaia socialism is cleverly and craftily concealed. The death cult – for ultimately that is what Gaia socialism is – uses imagery and propaganda to hide its real intent. They cult will not tell you their true intentions which includes inter-alia: controlling all nation states; reducing the human population; unfettered abortion; total corporate-economic management; a complete reorientation of education around the cult; media control; massive taxation and regulation; and the replacement of monotheistic worship by that of Gaia prostration. What the cult presents is almost the opposite: a green children's future; happy polar bears; a contented Mother Earth; earth-friendly economies; communal happiness; one-world global harmony and benign universal government. The cult's message is – as it was with Nazism, Communism and the media's portrayal of Islam – the opposite of what it actually is and represents.

This is why most national populations show a huge concern – about 50 % in North America and 70 % in Europe – about Gaia and are open to the possibility of a New World Order centered around the UN management of all states and processes. The good news is that as more of the Globaloney Warming fraud is exposed the weaker this support becomes. This is because until recently most people did not pay attention to real-world facts. There is no anthropogenic Globaloney Warming of course. Like all cults the Gaia Fascism invokes 'science' to impose its irrationality. But so too did Hitlerism and Leninism.

The real objective is pure evil and follows the same path as that attempted by Hitler and the Lenin cult – world domination.


Some people are starting to wake up to this reality. It is the creation of a world government dedicated to the final destruction of anything resembling capitalism or freedom which is Gaia socialism's ultimate goal. UN world bondage wherein First World money is transferred in its Trillions to the Third World and where mandarins, banks and the UN grow rich and fat off of carbon trading, emissions control and energy rationing. A world in which the little peasant is taxed out of existence, and where the elite live large like L Ron Gore or the CRU scientists – all bagging their millions and billions while the average peasant struggles to pay a plethora of new taxes and suffers under an Orwellian regulatory environment.

Gaia socialism is more pernicious than Russian Fascism or Communism ever was. The propaganda is wonderful. No other cult has ever produced anything like it – children's future; tearful polar bears; a sick, mournful, frightened Mother Earth confronted by evil, greedy capitalist-driven humans. It is brilliant. But also quite insidious. As with all Fascisms, the Gaia cult's real intention is the exact opposite of what they market and try to sell.

The UN – what a collection of losers.

Hate Bush all you want. He screwed up quite a few things domestically. But one thing is certain. He saved the US from L Ron Gore and the Eco-idiots. Imagine if L Ron had won in 2000, and became moron-in-chief running the US. Kyoto would be signed. Copenfrauden would be a fait-accompli and the US would be fast on the track to a barbaric Third World cess-pool. Bless Bush. At the very least he did not aspire to have the UN run the world, and the collectivity of lunatics from Eco-Fascists, to Muslim despots and Latino Totalitarians in charge of the planet. Such are the motley collection of losers who want to turn carbon trading and emissions regulations into a World Government. All based on lies and absurdities that Co2 causes little Mother Earth to suffer.

Reality is black and white – once the facts are known. So here are some facts from the Globaloney Warming confab in freezing Denmark:

1. As ClimateGate reveals all of the data used by a very small group of CRU-UN IPCC scientists is a fraud.

2. None of the data was properly peer reviewed and none of it can be confirmed since the source data is lost.

3. The Earth was far warmer in pre-modern eras thereby annihilating the link between Co2 and climate. It has been noticeably cooling in the past 10 years.

4. Carbon trading which is now worth some $120 billion per annum, or about the same size as the total amount of monies given to the Globaloney Warming complex in the past few years, would benefit banks, investment houses, the UN and national governments.

5. World wide carbon taxes are being proposed at Copenfrauden which would give the UN hundreds of billions of tax money – which it will use to erect a Carbon regulatory government including transfers of billions from the First to the Third World.

Globaloney Warming is the largest effort in history to establish a World Government. All built around lies, deceit, fraud and criminal activity. It would benefit no-one except the vested parties – the UN, large banks, large corporations, the Greenists, and tax funded entities who prey in the wilds of the 'Green market'.

A bigger collection of cheats, frauds and mafia is hard to find.

Witness this simple black and white fact – the UN Copenfrauden delegation giving the erstwhile Venezuelan fascist and idiot Chavez, a standing ovation and applauding his like minded totalitarian friends Morales and Mugabe. Does this not reveal the depravity of this group and completely nullify its supposed 'high mindedness' in saving Mother Earth ? The UN and the IPCC are simply Marxist and Socialist clubs where little minds of a feather squawk and flock together:

Nevertheless, "President Chavez brought the house down," according to newspaper the Australian, when he addressed the U.N. Climate Change Conference on Wednesday. "When he said there was a 'silent and terrible ghost in the room' and that ghost was called capitalism, the applause was deafening."

Socialism, Chavez told the fawning audience, is "the way to save the planet" while "the destructive model of capitalism is the eradication of life." And: "Capitalism is the road to hell. ... Let's fight against capitalism and make it obey us."

For that nugget of nonsense, Chavez received a standing ovation.

Proceeding Chavez to the rostrum was Evo Morales, a pal of Chavez, Ahmadinejad and Fidel Castro and the first fully "indigenous" head of state in Bolivia. Morales set the table for Chavez, declaring the real cause of climate change to be "the capitalist system."

"If we want to save the earth," he said, "then we must end that economic model."...

Mugabe, who has beaten, tortured and killed his opponents and has been sanctioned for human-rights abuses, held forth on the anti-capitalist theme. He scolded the "capitalist gods of carbon" who "burp and belch their dangerous emissions," leaving "the lesser mortals of the developing sphere" to "gasp and sink and eventually die."

http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article.aspx?id=515696

Once again the UN and its agglomeration of losers, giving Fascists a standing ovation. Yet we are told that a UN controlled World body, regulating energy, carbon and carbon trading is the only possible way that Mother Earth can be saved from a crisis which of course does not exist. Gaia worship is nothing more than a loose fig leaf hiding Globalist-Marxist desire at running the world.

The UN long ago ceased being useful. It is what it is – a collection of idiots, One-World wonders; and unreformed Marxists and Totalitarians. Globaloney Warming is just the latest in a long line of UN disasters and prototypes erected to destroy the nation state, eradicate capitalism and capital and subject the average peasant to UN bondage. Not to mention its overt support of Fascist Islam and failed Arab culture and its seething deranged anti-Americanism and anti-semiticism.

It is high time that the UN was de-funded, destroyed and laid to rest.

Globaloney Warming agreements are illegal.

Outside of the socialist-Continental paradise of Europe, the rest of the world is still largely run by realists managing a collectivity known as a state. The nation state embodies for good or ill, the will of a population. The benefits of the nation state are clear including one important factor. Outside of trade agreements, military pacts, and diplomatic regimes, national laws, constitutions and domestic agreements always triumph over the international. Always. And such a claim is usually embedded in the Constitutions of the nation state. So it goes for Globaloney Warming. The entire concept of ceding sovereignty to the UN, without a democratic referendum is utterly illegal.

Trans-nationalism or Globalism is a movement of the Left. It is Marxist, Communalist and designed to neuter domestic laws and Constitutions. The UN is the usual vehicle of such aspirations. Various UN agencies from the Human Rights Commission, to the IPCC or Climate Change Committee, to the evilly named 'Center for Reproductive Law and Policy' (CRLP which advocates state paid abortion) abound. In fact CRLP has tried to sue the US into funding unfettered, state paid abortion [thrown out in a New York court] – due to its claim that such an ideal was 'international law'. These UN groups are always looking for more power. Hence the IPCC's moronic claim that Co2 causes 'warming'. Is there a better way to control nation states than to declare a natural chemical a toxin and have the UN 'solve the problem'?

It does not take a Harvard Law degree or the brilliance of a mind like that of the Black Jesus, to see 'international law' for what it is – a game, a gimmick by socialists and trans-nationalists to neuter the nation state.

Thus the ridiculous claims for example, by wailing Leftards, that Israel is in constant violation of international law by building an apartment on some desolate guano covered hillock on the 'West Bank'. There is of course no codified 'international law' and certainly no internationally agreed upon set of statutes which are applied equally to Arabs and Israelis. When Hamas launches rockets into Jewish day care centers it is a clear breach of the cease-fire agreement between the two parties. As such the Israeli Defence Forces have every moral, military and legal imperative to react. International law – outside of clear and binding agreements on trade, military pacts and rules of engagement in war and diplomacy between two clear actors or states – is a fantasy. It simply does not exist.

The only laws which are international and which are binding are those between states - not those signed by states inside an international fora such as the UN. The only legal international agreements are those which are clear, codified and address a certain function – trade, military agreements, refugees, foreign aid perhaps – and which give the signing state in question the ability to withdraw, amend the agreement to conform to its constitution, or the ability to reform the agreement if and when democratic positions within that state change.

In other words international law in the abstract, cannot exist, if it denies that the legal organizing principle of all matters of legality, reside with the residents of the nation state.

The UN for example cannot go into Holland and impose its version of 'Human Rights' on the Dutch. It will however, write simpleton 'reports' which criticize the Dutch handling of say Somalian refugees; but it cannot pass a resolution ordering for instance restitution and larger welfare paid homes for said refugees and expect the Dutch to comply. Such a UN action is by itself illegal and would transgress UN statutes.

So witness the idiocy of Globaloney Warming. Here we have little corrupt minds – most of them far left in their political orientation – meeting in Copenhagen and in the future, in other exotic locales, making up nonsense about controlling and reducing carbon and energy usage. But a basic question is never asked by the unwashed dirty peasant mass to its superiors and betters. Where is the legality and constitutionality of such a project ? Since when can a politician or a group of self-serving bureaucrats agree to UN inspired legislation which will have a deleterious impact on the local political-economy and which directly cedes sovereignty to an unaccountable and unelected body outside of any national control ?

Trade treaties for instance are always under the control of some national deliberative body and in the case of tribunals subject to national input and control. There are also well defined 'escape' clauses from agreements like NATO, NAFTA, and even the EU. The exit clause is open to national prerogative, no matter how painful.

But with Globaloney Warming there is no assurance of any of these safeguards. Kyoto and now Copenhagen are far different than existing and accountable treaties on trade or military alliances. They are not clear and precise agreements but vague and binding commitments on reducing energy usage and carbon emissions. Since there is no science and no rational for this the agreements must be viewed for what they are, namely; the domestic and international imposition of a huge panoply of energy taxes; and the ceding of national political-economy authority at least in part, to the UN.

It is clear that Globaloney Warming agreements would be illegal since they would be an imposed and undemocratic international accord, and one which tries to nullify domestic laws and constitutions. The only way that Copenhagen could be declared even remotely legal, is if the nation state in-toto supported it, in a referendum. This referendum would need to also change national laws and perhaps even the national constitution, to allow the UN to have control over some part of the domestic political-economy. Without such a national ratification any international treaty designed to reduce carbon emissions would be illegal.

Most 'scholars' and 'academics' would of course disagree with the above. But they are part of the problem. Legal 'experts' are overwhelmingly of the Leftard persuasion. They hate for example, that the US constitution allows the Americans to ignore these meaningless treaties – most of which like Kyoto are rejected by the US Senate anyways.

But the transnationalist agenda is pretty clear. By using the UN and the fear-mongering issued by its various NGO organs on certain issues, the transnationalist hopes to effectively bring domestic laws and constitutions under the umbrella of the UN and international accords. By so doing the nation state will be rendered powerless – paving the way for a Global government which is precisely the point behind Globaloney Warming.

So we can agree on two things. First, what is going on in Copenhagen and around Globaloney Warming qua international agreements is not only immoral, but illegal. Second, the real goal of those who support the illegality of 'international law' is to reduce the nation state and in particular the ability of America, to act independently. Why any sentient, freedom loving person would be supportive of such a crass, vulgar and insipid plan is beyond comprehension. But then again, millions of dunces do believe in Globaloney Warming and there are 1.6 billion Muslims world wide supporting the moon cult of Mecca. The human is probably not as rational as we would pretend to believe.

Ice ages are the Climactic Norm – More Warming please.

Soon the Globaloney Warming cult will have the same poll ratings as the Great Black Jesus – that is to say ineffably and strongly negative. The Mother Earth Cult was long a fraud and only recently and incontrovertibly exposed as such. The largest scam in history in fact with Marxist designs at World Government. For any child not brain-washed by public school propaganda knows that the climactic norm on Mother Earth is an ice age. Far from being evil – Co2 emissions are a natural chemical necessary for life – and one which denotes progress not despoliation. Concepts that the Green Fascists are unfamiliar with.

Back in February 2009 a real scientist one William Happer, the Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics at Princeton University gave a statement to the Robespierrian titled U.S. Senate Environment and Public Works Committee. A bizarre name for an eclectic and largely useless oversight committee. This real scientist made it clear – as many have done over the past decades – that the mean climate on the Mother Earth ship is an ice age and that Co2 has no impact whatsoever on natural processes and climate change:

“...the current warming period began about 1800 at the end of the little ice age, long before there was an appreciable increase of CO2. There have been similar and even larger warmings several times in the 10,000 years since the end of the last ice age. These earlier warmings clearly had nothing to do with the combustion of fossil fuels. The current warming also seems to be due mostly to natural causes, not to increasing levels of carbon dioxide. Over the past ten years there has been no global warming, and in fact a slight cooling. This is not at all what was predicted by the IPCC models.

.........

Many of us are aware that we are living in an ice age, where we have hundred-thousand-year intervals of big continental glaciers that cover much of the land area of the northern hemisphere, interspersed with relative short interglacial intervals like the one we are living in now. By looking at ice cores from the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets, one can estimate past temperatures and atmospheric concentrations of CO2. Al Gore likes to display graphs of temperature and CO2 concentrations over the past million years or so, showing that when CO2 rises, the temperature also rises. Doesn't this prove that the temperature is driven by CO2? Absolutely not! If you look carefully at these records, you find that first the temperature goes up, and then the CO2 concentration of the atmosphere goes up. There is a delay between a temperature increase and a CO2 increase of about 800 years.”

Reality, observations and data make it clear that there is no Co2 or anthropogenic warming. In fact the opposite is obvious

But Happer is just simply an Exxon paid dunce is he not ? Exxon et al have a lot to gain from Globaloney Warming and carbon trading have spent millions funding this research. But Happer is hardly an oil loving goon. As his introduction made clear he has spent his entire professional life studying the interactions of visible and infrared radiation with gases - “one of the main physical phenomena behind the greenhouse effect. I have published over 200 papers in peer reviewed scientific journals. I am a member of a number of professional organizations, including the American Physical Society and the National Academy of Sciences.”

And so on. A resume of a scientist – which never makes it into the media, L Ron Gore's presentations or the laughably hysterical UN declarations that the world will soon end. Just for the record the first UN pronouncement that Globaloney Warming would destroy Mother Earth was made in 1989 with the end of the world occurring circa 2000. Rather an inaccurate forecast one could say. But according the media-UN complex we must believe every moronic statement and forecast from the cult.

We should be happy that we are living in an interregnum period – it sure beats living in an age of ice with no modern world. As one geologist stated:

“The climate of the ice ages is documented in the ice layers of Greenland and Antarctica. We have cored these layers, extracted them, and studied them in the laboratory. Not only were ice ages colder than today, but the climates were considerably more variable. Compared to the norm of the last million years, our climate is remarkably warm, stable and benign. During the last ice age in Greenland abrupt climatic swings of 30 °F were common. Since the ice age ended, variations of 3 °F are uncommon.”

As I wrote previously in connection with the above comment and factual reality, “Today we have little minds squawking about a 1.2 C change in temperature. From 1945 to 1975, with a world-wide economy growing at more than 5%, and with industrial post-war production reaching historic highs, the earth's temperature fell by some 1 C. Hence in the 1970s and 80s, the hysterical calls about Globaloney Cooling. Than the temperature for about 10 years gradually increased about 1 C or to the mean level for the past 100 years. Hence the hysterical calls about Globaloney Warming. Do not the exaggerated calls and predictions of the end of the world, not appear to be rather insane?” http://www.craigread.com/displayArticle.aspx?contentID=997&subgroupID=14

Insanity is after all a hallmark of a cult. Irrational paganism is not a sign of intelligence but of puerility, stupidity and in the case of the UN, L Ron Gore, the oil firms, and large corporations, an indication of greed and lust for power. Why would any cognitive person, complain about a natural chemical which is emitted mostly by nature and which is less than 1 % of all 'greenhouse' gases ? These are the same people one assumes who would have believed Nazi propaganda, Lenin's epistles, Stalin's writings predicting the inevitable victory of Russian-socialism over capitalism; or the madness encased in the lunacy of the Koran and the Moon cult of Arabia.

Why does anyone want morons running the world ?

The Cult of Globaloney Warming – Fascistic in the true sense.

The pathetic nature of cults is that they prey on the innocent, the blind, the true-believing, the morally naive, and the just plain stupid. Globaloney Warming acolytes are all of these – irrational pagans trying to feel important, accruing money and power, or engaged in some affirmation of their relevance by 'caring' about Mother Earth. They are organizations not only with immoral claims of 'total knowledge' but with absurd notions that only they know the truth; the reality; and the future direction of mankind. Hegel and Marxian dialecticism combined with pagan theology. Very, very scary.

Cults are never of course, neutral creations. They can't be. By definition they are formed in opposition to a 'them'. Typically the 'other' is a system, or a class, or a group, or a set of ideas which have power, relevancy and which appear to be 'arbitrary' or 'unfair'. For the Nazis it was the Jews who were simply too predominant in German society. For the Russian Fascists it was capital, money and private property – a system owned and operated by Anglo Saxons and Jews. For the Arabs and Muslims it is the system of Jewish-Christian civilization which negates the belief that the moon cult of Mecca is the final expression of 'Gods' will. For the Globaloney Warming Fascists it is the modern world of choice, individuality, some form of democracy and the formation of rent-seeking capital which must be expunged. All of the cults hate the person, the human, the free and extol the communal, the subservient and the exaltation ultimately of death.

Cults quickly morph into intolerant, highly violent Fascisms in the true sense of that word, oriented around a theology of make-believe, inarticulate and evil. Cults quickly mutate into universal designs as one can easily see in the Fascistologies of Islam, the Soviet Worker movement, or German Nazism. All pagan cults desire the complete destruction of the modern world and the imposition of the cult's surreal program of pagan idiocy.

So it goes with the Globaloney Warming cult. The UN, abetted by academic hacks, politicians, the media, and self-interested large corporations has engaged in the largest pagan fraud in history. Over a $150 billion has been wasted on the cult and its member groups – all around the peculiarly mad idea that a natural chemical which is less than 1% of the total mass of gaseous emissions throughout the complex convection process of the Earth's climate system, is somehow forcing a 'warming'. Real evidence suggests a cooling trend – mostly due to a reduction in sunspot activity and most likely from an assortment of interacting variables which the human will never understand.

It is certainly not about science is it ? The CRU – the main research venue for the Globaloney cult of warming – has recently shut down its website and has withdrawn all of its information. The frauds such as the Briffa curve, Mann's hockey stick fable, and other supposed climatic proof that dear little Mother Earth was going to explode in a heat wave are no longer available for the peasant mass to view. How transparent. The cult likely things that the hoi-polloi are too ignorant and uneducated to understand the details of climate. The dirty mass too stupefied to think and be critical. Just follow us, the cult says, and believe what we say – or else we will crush you.

Globaloney Warming is a cult of intolerant Fascistic ideals. Witness the following:

1. Lies and propaganda claiming to be science.
2. Never revealing their 'science' or having it opened up to investigation.
3. Demanding that the end of the world will occur unless the cult is obeyed.
4. Trying to institute at national and international levels some form of policing and audit system [such as carbon caps, emissions levels, and trading schemes], designed to control and regulate industry and even personal consumer choice.
5. Spending tax money to promote in schools and in the popular culture only the ideas emanating from the cult.
6. Brainwashing children that they know better than their parents about climate reality.
7. Using the media to make false claims on everything from melting ice caps, to drowning polar bears to rising oceans.
8. Attacking and threatening to physically eliminate 'deniers' who dare to criticize the cult.
9. Demands for unlimited political and taxation power – all in the name of the cult of Gaia.
10. Usurping democracy by engaging in trans-national treaties which cannot be audited nor obstructed by national populations and local voters.

The Globaloney Warming cult even has its own Mohammed, Lenin or Hitler – L Ron Gore, Phil Jones of the CRU, the Marxist Sierra Club, the UN Climate Chief de Boer, and various Hollywood addled idiots amongst others, all play parts in the role of Dear Leader. What is missing from the Globaloney Warming Fascism is something like Mein Kampf, or the Koran, though perhaps L Ron Gore's 'Inconvenient Truth' and some sundry Eco-nonsense books have certainly vied for the title of Eco-Bible.

The closest thing to a Marxist-inspired scientific dialecticism was of course the CRU's 'scientific' analysis of a warming climate. ClimateGate makes it quite clear that the CRU and the UN along with L Ron Gore, were engaged in a 10 year or more fraud of the grandest possible scale. Literally trillions of dollars in new taxes and welfare distribution with control over the world's population was being touted as the only resolution to the manufactured crisis. ClimateGate blew up the only dialectical foundation for the cult – and exposed it for the pagan Fascist fraud that it is.

In the age of rationality it is rather remarkable that a Fascist paganism, which is even more absurd in every measure than even Islam or Nazism could have come so close to dominating the world's political-economy. Green Fascism would be no more kinder, rational or enlightened than Russian Fascism, Mohammedanism or Hitlerism. It is a remarkable commentary that so many millions are so ready to be duped and raped by a cult. The self-loathing human will always be prey to man-created evil theologies.

The ugly Socialism of Eco-Fascism

Left wing idiots and Left-tards never learn. They transform their sickness from decade to decade to support ever-changing 'Brave New Worlds'. From Marxist yearnings to destroy money and private property to Globaloney Warming and the management of a natural chemical necessary for life. All of it in the name of equality or justice – Marxist bywords for the opposite. Socialism destroys and its inherent evil ensures its eventual collapse.

Just behold the gang of socialist losers supporting Copen-dopey-hagen and the institution of a Carbon trading and rationing World Government: Co2mmunists; Marxists; anti-Capitalists; Luddites; the Pony-tail-sandals-smart car set; Enviro-freaks; and the usual melange of self-interested investment bankers, politicians and UNO-crats, all desiring tax-payer money and more power.

A more convincing array of idiots and losers does not exist.

Yet on their command, supported by 12-15 politically paid off 'scientists' who worked directly for the Globaloney alarmists, benefiting immensely thereby; we are supposed to annihilate the modern world; reduce industry to misery and tax the toiling peasant back into feudalistic subservience. This gang of unfortunate morons makes shooting oneself in the head look rational.

The migration of socialist fanaticism over time, to encompass new and 'urgent' issues – generated by unequal, predatory, Anglo-Saxon capitalism – is almost without end. In the past 50 years we have seen rampant, unintelligent and incoherent socialist philosophy and propaganda support inter-alia: Nazism, Mussolini, Lenin-Stalinism, Mao, Castro, Malthusian theories; unilateral disarmament; the transfers of huge sums from the First to the Third World; Globaloney Cooling; Acid rain annihilation; massive payments for 'rampant specie' destruction; a World Government centered around the UN; and now Globaloney Warming soon to morph into 'Climate Change'.

There is nothing intelligent about any of these positions.

Vaclav Klaus, the President of the Czech Republic, warned a long time ago that environmentalism has already become the 'new socialism' in which to safeguard Mother Earth, the government can seize all of the important factors in the national and transnational political-economy. Socialism like all cults is a universalist aspiration.

Stalin's socialism-in-one-country concept was a convenient rationale to explain why the Leninist-Marxist prediction that the advanced economies would become socialist first, failed to materialize. It was anomalous. Typically socialist theory is transnational. The destruction of property and money is to be a international phenomenon – uniting the various 'working classes' together in their joyful overthrow of money and the monied plutocracy. The UN is premised on these ideals especially in its exhortation of the cult of Globaloney Warming. Control carbon, energy and production and you can control everything else including taxation, politics and all aspects people's lives.

Environmentalism has long been the repository of failed socialist ideologues. The Green movement is nothing more than just a Marxist movement used by politicians and bureaucracies to further state power. No politician or power monger is immune from its allure. The unfettered 'right' to accrue unlimited power, in the guise of a moral crusade to save our dear Mother Gaia, is tempting even to the most moral and straight of 'conservatives'. But one thing about socialism is a fact – it always ends badly for both those in power and those who lives are destroyed by the fanaticism of the little minds screaming about 'justice' and 'equality'.

The Childishness of Globaloney Warming and subservience to the UN.

The combination of losers which support Globaloney Warming namely - Marxists, Globalists, Co2mmunists, Green Fascists, college something airheads, some Academics, the media and power whoring politicians and bureaucrats – are the manifestations of idiocy and childishness. No person who can think, rationalize and understand even basic science, and who covets freedom, modernity and a better world through a wealthier world, should put up with these gaping morons and their insanity. The Eco-cult of Globaloney Warming true believers is without question the dumbest, most insidious and collectively deranged cult in history. It is also the most childish and immoral.

The whole point of the Globaloney Warming scam is transnational governance – and the accretion of money and power by various self-interested parties in this process. Investment bankers and investors in carbon trading firms like L Ron Gore the eco-whore, will make billions off of carbon-trading. The UN will transmogrify into a World Government managing carbon emissions of states and individuals and imposing a world-wide tax on Co2. National governments will tax all aspects of carbon usage and production. National and transnational regulators will have the power to manage, control and neuter businesses through the control of carbon credits, emission levels, and any process which uses carbon at any level – including clothing, food, and consumables.

In other words the scam is the imposition of Green Fascism – a nefarious Orwellian nightmare of Greenist control centered at the UN.

And we the hoi-polloi should be happy about this ?

Well apparently some morons throughout the width and breadth of society are very concerned about 'climate justice'; 'eco-sustainability' and 'Warming reality'. These are the same collection of idiots who were profoundly disturbed by Globaloney Cooling; Acid Rain; the Ozone hole; Nuclear Winters; Population explosions; Famines and the ineluctable destruction of all natural resources. These losers have now migrated to the insipidity of the Polar Bear-Children's future Mother Earth cult and bang pots and pans in the streets demanding an end to Co2 production and the transfers of trillions of dollars to combat 'a changing climate', as if man can manage the winds, sunsports, and the entire million variable convection process called 'weather'.

What a group of slavering, drooling, knuckle dragging monkeys.

Robert Fulford writing at the National Post captures the abject immaturity of the Globaloney Warming cult by parodying the Canadian mentality to 'be liked by the UN'. As if that is important. The general societal fetish that the UN, and all foreign states must 'like us' and 'approve' of our actions is nothing more than childish immaturity. A corrupt body like the UN must given sanction to our existence ? How dumb are these people ?

“Through this process, the Toronto Star kept its readers on top of what the Star considers should be the national mood. Star editors, understandably, were almost paralyzed with grief over our nation's carbon emissions failure and our unfortunate reputation. But on Wednesday, a sudden shaft of light pierced the encircling gloom. At last there was a turn for the better. The Star spread the joyful news in a headline stretching across a full page: "Climate change chief gives Canada a break."

It seems that Yvo de Boer, described by the Star as "none other than the United Nations' climate chief," had uttered a word of consolation to Canada. He acknowledged that we were left in an awkward position when the United States, after signing the Kyoto Protocol, failed to ratify it. "Canada did ratify the Kyoto Protocol, but its main trading partner did not," de Boer said. That left Canada in a "very unbalanced situation."

Why do I give a rat's ass what de Boer – or any other UN simpleton thinks ? Who is de Boer ? Why is there a UN climate chief ? What gives the UN the right, the authority to even discuss another countries performance in any area ? Why the arrogance from the UN ? Why the slavish subservience from Canada's largest newspaper to UN whims and decrees ? Is there any sanity left in the media ?

The entire corpus of genuflection to the Globaloney-Warming cult by the media is Swiftian to say the least.

And this national humiliation was replicated across the world by every major media outlet. The great question should not be, 'Will the UN approve of us?', it should be, 'What will we do as a nation state to improve modernity, increase wealth, and produce technology which will benefit humans and the eco-system'. What the UN does is meaningless. The UN is a corrupt, anti-Western and entirely useless organization whose only good works is in the form of children aid and support. The UN as a totality should be shut down.

But witness the unending childishness of this Globaloney Warming scam. 'Scientists' falsifying data. The boundless mysticism of the entire Globaloney Warming project – no science just faith. The corruption of money and power. National newspapers slavishly following the UN propaganda. People enraptured when a UN official says something nice about a nation state's efforts to help poor Mother Earth. The willingness of whole societies to genuflect to a corrupt trans-national organization and literally begging it to destroy the modern world and take us back to 1870 with massive Co2 'cuts' and the neutering of all industry.

Globaloney Warming is nothing more than the expression of a limitless reserve of childishness, immaturity and crass stupidity, the likes of which has rarely been seen in human history. Who said society was getting smarter in an age of technology and science ? It seems quite clear that most of society is quite mad – and quite childish.

Copenhagen is preparing us for a World Government. Read its draft.

The fact that Globaloney Warming is a made up fantasy is not important for the cult's true believers. As the UN increases the alarmism – 'this decade is the hottest in history' though no proof of course is offered – the need to ActNow! becomes the imperative. Acting now means Globalist Transnational UN based governance. That is the whole point of this scam.

Regulate the world, by controlling carbon. Demonize a natural chemical through lies and criminal 'science', and create a 'moral climate' and demand for Global Marxism. [Only the UN can save us ! We only have 14 days !] Engage in endless propaganda from grade school to the mainstream media to ensure brainwashing and compliance. Shower tax dollars on the followers; freeze-out, so to speak, the deniers. All effected so a tiny cadre of cult leadership with their UN friends can benefit.....and the rest of the peasant mass can simply suffer.

Global governance is the primary goal of the Globaloney Warming cult. Saving Mother Earth is just a rhetorical-metaphysical cover. The pernicious side of Global Governance should be obvious – higher taxes; regulation of industry; far lower living standards; micro-regulation of all aspects of life and the creation of an unaccountable Marxist world body which is entirely corrupt, autocratic and pathetic. But the immorality is even deeper. The UN and other governments are musing about; unfettered murder [abortion clinics]; culling the human herd [reducing numbers so that the carbon footprint is reduced]; Chinese-style limits on babies born [1 per woman worldwide ?]; and carbon ration cards for the dirty peasant [exceed your ration card and pay a high tax].

None of these of course would apply to the Eco-Fascist elite.

One assumes that the UN officers will still fly first class and be escorted around exotic locales in limousines. One assumes that L Ron Gore, George Soros, Maurice Strong, and others will still live in palatial homes, consume as much carbon produced energy and food as they want, and be able to drive and fly at whim.

One assumes that the national 'Eco Police' to be created in every modern state, will earn far more in union wages than the average serf they investigate for carbon consumption crimes or driving a car which is larger than a storage box.

One assumes that the politicians pushing for this Green Fascism, will live quite comfortably with their ill-gotten monies made in under the table carbon-trading and in kickbacks from firms who wish to avoid stiff carbon taxes and regulations.

But such benefits will not exist for the peasant. Besides mandatory Eco-cult brainwashing and homage to Mother Earth, the average person will face job loss, declining wages, extraordinarily steep rising taxes and costs, and the effective destruction of local democracy. Once the UN sets up a transnational agency to manage carbon and energy, the rest is over. Once you control energy, you control power, the political structures and ultimately the ability to tax and control. This is explicit in the UN's draft Copenhagen Treaty. Read these articles from that treaty:

20. The Parties share the view that the strengthened financial architecture should be able to handle gradually scaled up international public support. International public finance support to developing countries [should/shall] reach the order of [X] billion USD in 2020 on the basis of appropriate increases in mitigation and adaptation efforts by developing countries.

21. The Parties confirm climate financing committed under this agreement as new and additional resources that supplement existing international public financial flows otherwise available for developing countries in support of poverty alleviation and the continued progress towards the Millennium Development Goals. In this regard:

- Developed country parties commit to deliver upfront public financing for 2010-201[2] corresponding on average to [10] billion USD annually for early action, capacity building, technology and strengthening adaptation and mitigation readiness in developing countries as set forth in Attachment C;

-From [2013] The Parties commit to regularly review appropriateness of contributions and the circle of contributors against indicators of fairness based on GDP and emissions levels and taking into account the level of development as set forth in Attachment C.

24. To enhance transparency and overview The Parties decide to establish an International Climate Financing Board under the UNFCCC to monitor and review international financing for climate action and in this context identify any gaps and imbalances in the international financing for mitigation and adaptation actions that may arise. The Board will consist of [x] representatives from developed countries and [y] representatives from developing countries. [Z] Representatives from international institutions will participate in the Board as permanent observers. Decision making will be by consensus. [If all efforts to reach a compromise have been exhausted and no agreement has been reached, decisions shall be taken by a two-thirds majority]. The UNFCCC Secretariat will serve as secretariat for the International Climate Financing Board. Parties endorse the further guidelines as set out in attachment D and decision X7/CP.15.” http://tickerforum.org/cgi-ticker/akcs-www?post=121083

These initiatives are just the first steps in enlarging the UN into a Globalist Mother Earth cult, with almost unfettered powers. The above 3 articles achieve the following: 1. The transfer of over time, Trillions of dollars to a UN Climate oversight committee which will make binding laws on nation states; 2. Giving the UN the powers to decide how much carbon can be emitted in each signatory to this agreement; and 3. Give the UN broad powers to increase the transfer of money over time, from the developed to the developing world, based solely on UN appraisals of the dangers that 'climate change' might cause.

It is frightening. Marxist Governance is implicit in the entire Copenhagen document and in the above 3 articles. It is the culmination of 250 years of socialist-utopian yearnings distinctly embedded in the twin Fascisms of Hitlerism and Leninism. It is rather remarkable that the Western powers – slow to oppose German militarism from the time of Bismarck to Wilhelm; yet patient enough to outlast Russian Fascism – are now succumbing without a fight, without a debate, to the predations of an unaccountable cult inspired by UN immorality.

Civilizations do disappear and we might be witnessing the death of the West as it becomes consumed by the pagan Mother Earth cult.

The True Believers of the Eco-cult.

Cults are impossible for the rational to understand. They benefit no-one but their leaders. The followers lose first their money, than their minds, than their souls and conscience and often-times, their lives. Irrational propaganda, myths, hate, psychological derangement and self-interested money and power mongering disfigure the cult and its followers. Globaloney Warming is no different than any other cultish idiocy. It inevitably leads to the creation of a culture of death. The end derivative of UN inspired Globaloney Warming and Mother Earth worship is of course to kill off as many humans as possible. So who will choose who will live or die ?

If you read and listen to the Globaloney Warming alarmists closely you will notice three disturbing features which are portrayed by any cult.

First, there is no rationality whatsoever in any of their arguments but the cult maintains [much as Hitlerism and Stalinism did], that 'science', 'progress' and inevitability are on their side. As ClimateGate, real physics and common sense reveals, the entire corpus of Globaloney Warming alarmism is built on manipulated lies and deceit, as much as Nazi Aryan mythology or Soviet New Worldism was constructed – both of which were ardently supported by Western academics and the media as the best examples of 'social engineering' a better society.

Second, the cult is extremely intolerant to its chosen enemies. For the Nazis it was the Jew. For the Russian Fascists it was 'capitalism' and money. For the Globaloney Warming cult it is anyone who objects to the pagan mysticism that a natural chemical necessary for life is directly linked to climate change, and that the human, which emits 5% of the chemical has any impact on climate at all.

Third, it is the seething hate and violence of the cult which is obvious. Plans to cull the human herd, impose unfettered abortion, limit the number of babies born, and issue Co2 ration cards to every person [excepting the cult leadership which will continue to live in palaces and jet around the world because they are so important] are all in train. Is it not remarkable that the main stream media so focused on 'conservative' or Christian Fascists does not relate the speeches, books, web postings and meetings where destroying human life is being planned ? [Well actually given the uselessness of the MSM it is not surprising – but hey! Those damn Jews are building another apartment on a bird shit covered hillock in the 'occupied' territory, those bloody Fascists!]

So the cult not only persists it expands. The Globalist intention of the Globaloney Warming cult is clear. The ideology of Mother Earth worship is just a means to create a Transnational system of governance; carbon trading; welfare transfers and taxation. That is the goal. It is the creation of a system designed to neuter nation states and render the average free man in the West, a knave of an unelected, unaccountable elite. It is Orwellian and frightening.

Witness the demands by the UN that $60 billion more be given to them to make 'plans' on 'managing' climate change [as if humans can now manage the weather, the seasons, and the winds]:

“An organization representing the grandest ambitions of climate scientists wants Western nations to spend at least $2.1 billion a year for the next five years — and as much as $60 billion overall during that period — to glean huge troves of still undiscovered climate information from the world's land, air and seas.

The information system aims to measure literally everything environmental, from the full amount of plant leaf material in the world's ecosystems to the differences in saltiness throughout the world's oceans to the discharge from every one of the world's major rivers,

...

But most of all, the titanic effort, the report states, is "essential to support further research, to initialize predictions on timescales out to decades ahead, and for the development of the models used to make these predictions and longer-term scenario-based projections."

The observations it gathers will be "used to assess social and economic vulnerabilities and to develop the actions needed across a broad range of sectors to adapt to climate variability and unavoidable change.

In other words, to encompass the future of the entire planet.”

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,579956,00.html

The preparatory stages for a World Government. Only a slavering moron mired in Marxist mythology would find that remotely relevant or interesting.

The entire nexus of Globaloney Warming fear mongering is already debunked – which means that the political manifestation of this cult's demands for Globalist governance is pure evil. For example Steven McIntyre reveals the 'tricks' that the Globaloney Warming 'scientists' or hacks used to hide the decline here - climateaudit.org/2009/12/10/ipcc-and-the-trick/. The UN-IPCC was complicit in this fraud. In fact it was demanding that the temperature declines being recorded during the 1990s be covered up during a meeting in Tanzania in 1999 [must be nice to jet set around the world on Co2 emitting planes to exotic locales like Tanzania]. Since 1999 of course the global 'mean temperature' – a useless and misleading indicator anyways – has gone down [irregardless of UN claims to the contrary].

From Tanzania to Copenhagen - the small minds of the UN-IPCC now wave graphs in front of TV cameras slobbering that the current decade is now the warmest ever recorded in man's history.

Except of course for the entire Medieval warm period, the decade of 1783; the 1840s; the 1890s; the 1930s; and sundry other decades over the past 150 years. Except for all those exceptions the current decade ending is certainly the warmest on record – or we should say, it has to be to prove the idiocy that a natural chemical necessary for life, which is less than 1% of the gaseous mass in the atmosphere is 'forcing' climate to change through a radiative process which does not exist [the earth is a convection system]. This is mandatory of course for the UN-IPCC to have any relevancy.

The fact that the data supports the opposite conclusion – the earth is actually cooling as Sun spot activity recedes – is unimportant. What is vital is that you the average knave must trust the IPCC – the hide the decline people. They are after all completed disinterested 'scientists' concerned about your health and the fate of Mother Earth.

And if you believe that than you truly are a dunce and a firm supporter of a death cult with designs on managing your entire existence. How very progressive indeed.

Globaloney Warming Lies – the UN persists.

So the great minds at CRU and of the UN tell us peasants that the current decade is the warmest of record. Yes sure it is. No evidence is provided. No data. No source files. No real 'peer reviews'. No details on how a natural chemical like Co2 'forces' climate to change. No information on why some places in the planet are actually getting quite a bit colder. No definition of what is meant by 'global mean temperature' and why that is important [most climate conditions are determined locally, excepting the sun, it is the law of physical thermodynamics]. Nothing at all. Just some idiots at the UN waving the already debunked and pathetic Mann hockey stick curve [see http://tinyurl.com/ye2b74r for info] and slobbering that the end is nigh. It is insanity. And the media does nothing.

It is a high crime what is taking place with Globaloney Warming and the ascent to Globalist Marxist governance. Wiping out the modern world is a sure derivative of the cult's program. Carbon dioxide has no impact whatsoever on climate. That linkage has never been proven. According to physical laws it would be impossible. And given the fact that the current Co2 level is far below the historical norm, it is clear that human activity – which might account for some 5 % of all Co2 emissions – is meaningless in affecting climate. The entire edifice of UN-Globaloney Warming lies is so monstrous and deluded, words do not exist to adequately explain its evil.

Thousands of real scientists – some 35.000 at last count – oppose Kyoto and the whole entire corpus of Globaloney Warming. Many hundreds of these real scientists have formed their own website and association and have written a letter to the UN demanding that the CRU and the UN prove their claims about anthropogenic warming. It is a clear letter. So when will the UN and the CRU 'scientists', who are already savaged and discredited over their obvious criminality exposed by an inside informant in the form of thousands of documents, begin to enlighten us peasants with their 'proof' ? When will they answer some of these questions:

http://www.copenhagenclimatechallenge.org/

“8 December 2009
Dear Secretary-General,
Climate change science is in a period of ‘negative discovery’ - the more we learn about this exceptionally complex and rapidly evolving field the more we realize how little we know. Truly, the science is NOT settled.

Therefore, there is no sound reason to impose expensive and restrictive public policy decisions on the peoples of the Earth without first providing convincing evidence that human activities are causing dangerous climate change beyond that resulting from natural causes. Before any precipitate action is taken, we must have solid observational data demonstrating that recent changes in climate differ substantially from changes observed in the past and are well in excess of normal variations caused by solar cycles, ocean currents, changes in the Earth's orbital parameters and other natural phenomena.

We the undersigned, being qualified in climate-related scientific disciplines, challenge the UNFCCC and supporters of the United Nations Climate Change Conference to produce convincing OBSERVATIONAL EVIDENCE for their claims of dangerous human-caused global warming and other changes in climate. Projections of possible future scenarios from unproven computer models of climate are not acceptable substitutes for real world data obtained through unbiased and rigorous scientific investigation.
Specifically, we challenge supporters of the hypothesis of dangerous human-caused climate change to demonstrate that:

1.Variations in global climate in the last hundred years are significantly outside the natural range experienced in previous centuries;
2.Humanity’s emissions of carbon dioxide and other ‘greenhouse gases’ (GHG) are having a dangerous impact on global climate;
3.Computer-based models can meaningfully replicate the impact of all of the natural factors that may significantly influence climate;
4.Sea levels are rising dangerously at a rate that has accelerated with increasing human GHG emissions, thereby threatening small islands and coastal communities;
5.The incidence of malaria is increasing due to recent climate changes;
6.Human society and natural ecosystems cannot adapt to foreseeable climate change as they have done in the past;
7.Worldwide glacier retreat, and sea ice melting in Polar Regions , is unusual and related to increases in human GHG emissions;
8.Polar bears and other Arctic and Antarctic wildlife are unable to adapt to anticipated local climate change effects, independent of the causes of those changes;
9.Hurricanes, other tropical cyclones and associated extreme weather events are increasing in severity and frequency;
10.Data recorded by ground-based stations are a reliable indicator of surface temperature trends.”


All good points indeed. And let me add a few others:

1. The Mann hockey stick and Briffa curves have been debunked – why then do you keep waving around their fraudulent claim of human-induced warming.
2. Why is a Global mean temperature meaningful and what are the data sources – do they include satellite, oceanic, rural and tropospheric measurements. If not why not ?
3. Where is the Sun accounted for in your modeling and in your analysis ?
4. Please explain the decrease in global mean temperatures between 1945 and 1975 even as Co2 ramped up.
5. Why does Co2 correlate with warmer temperatures when it is only 1 % of all natural gases emitted, and provide proof that the earth is not a conductive system regarding climate; but a radiative one. Where is the agreed upon science on that ?

The UN of course cannot answer any of them. But yet we are assured that the science is settled and that the earth will implode circa 2017 unless we act now. UN Globalist governance, excessive transfers to the poorer states; monumental taxation and regulation of all processes using carbon, including all civilian life-styles; and the imposition of mandatory carbon-trading will cost Trillions and wipe out the modern world economy. For no effect at all, on the climate. It is insane. But rationality, prudence and common sense were never hallmarks of a Fascist cult.
But propaganda certainly is.

Copenhagen-Baloney: Only 2 weeks to save Mother Earth !!!

Lenin's useful or useless idiots, the media, need to be jailed.

The entire corpus of the Globaloney Warming stupidity is infected by Marxists, Left Wing losers, Co2mmunists, Globalists and One-World wonders. In other words the dregs of society. Yet the untutored peasant mass is told by the media to believe this self-interested cabal preaching doom and end of the world, because, well, they say so ? Ahem. Excuse the sentient for being more than just a little skeptical. Given the facts of Climate-Gate and natural physics, skepticism needs to turn very quickly into a revolt against the mainstream media and the Eco-cult. Or else we face the real calamity of Marxist One-World governance and the destruction of what remains of democratic-capitalist society.

Lenin's useful – or useless – idiots have always been a major problem in Western society. Lenin meant of course Western academics and the Western media. Both of these groups supported the communalism of Hitler and Lenin-Stalinism. Both of these groups were transfixed by the Marxist-Fascist theology of replacing the individual with unfettered state power. Both venerated Mussolini's strong man rule and his heroic-socialism. Both were mesmerized by the Brave New World that such Marxist – inspired ideologies could create – the world of perfect men and women; no genetic defects; communal pride and togetherness, irresolute power and unstoppable energy.

Both lied about the Hitlerite-Soviet experiments and their impact on the average human and their insatiable toll as the death cults murdered innocents. Both repeated ad-nauseum all of the Nazi-Soviet-Mussolini created lies about rampant GDP growth; improvement in living conditions; and the 'democratic' constitutions these regimes supposedly possessed. Many openly advocated Marxist-Fascism as a formula to 'renew' Britain and America.

So why would Lenin's useful idiots repudiate their Marxist fascination now ?

Both of Lenin's idiot classes are criminally complicit in history's biggest ever fraud. Climate-Gate and the obvious hoax of Globaloney Warming – in which a natural chemical necessary for life which makes up less than 1 % of all emissions, which the human is responsible for 5% of the total – is somehow killing off Mother Earth, or so the 'academics' and media intone.

Please.

What is really at stake is money, power and of course Globalist governance – all centred around Cap and Tax and the micro-regulation of every aspect of the miserable peasant's life. In other words – Marxist governance. The academics and media have a lot to gain if Globaloney Warming becomes the new church of trans-national governance. Not to mention banks, bankers, Carbon traders and erstwhile idiots like L Ron Gore the Eco-whore.

Monckton lays out the neo-Marxist plan embedded in Globaloney Warming quite well:
“World leaders, led by the nose by a handful of politically-motivated scientists and a crowd of what Lenin called “useful idiots” in the media and in academe, are about to bring democracy to an end worldwide – and all for the sake of stopping “global warming” that will not occur.

Recent science has finally proved that the warming effect of our greenhouse-gas emissions is small, harmless, and even beneficial.

Globally, we increase the atmospheric concentration of CO2 by 2 parts per million by volume per year. Even if the UN’s exaggerated estimate of the warming effect of CO2 were right, it would take 23 years at this rate to push up “global warming” by just 1 Fahrenheit degree.

In practice, though, the effect of CO2 is only one-seventh of what the UN imagines – so make that at least 150 years with no carbon emissions worldwide, at all, just to prevent 1°F of future warming. So the draft Treaty’s draconian measures are as economically futile as they are scientifically pointless. Game over.”
http://www.myfreedompost.com/2009/12/lord-christopher-monckton-on-copenhagen.html

If Copenhagen's Globaloney hooey becomes national and trans-national policy it will herald the beginning of the end for democratic and market based capitalism. The entire scam is based on 4 parts:

1)Enrich bankers and investment firms owned by people such as L Ron Gore, through the imposition of mandated carbon-trading.

2)Allow national governments to massively increase taxes and regulate the entire economy and society since every single aspect of living is based on or around the use of carbon.

3)Enrich huge companies who are in the 'Green-market', including many who own the media outlets.

4)Create the means for the UN to 'reward' poorer nations with First World Money through a global carbon tax and Trillions worth of redistributed money – the first step towards a World Government.

It is in summary pure madness and the greatest transfer of wealth in history. This insanity is abetted by the corruption of the media – many of which are owned by giant corporations who stand to benefit from the transfer of taxpayer money in the form of Green-subsidies. It is naked, immoral and criminal self-interest.

The media – the useful tools of Lenin's propaganda – are proving themselves once again not to be the '4th estate' but merely a collection of corrupted baboons intent on destroying the modern world and instituting an elite ruled Marxist nirvana – all centered around Gaia worship.

Steven McIntyre exposes the high criminality of the Eco Fascist cult.

The Earth is in a long term cooling trend by the way.

A basic premise of a pagan-Fascist cult is the supposition that the average person is a moron and needs to be led. This is the most vital hypothesis possessed by the cult – that people are wonderfully stupid. The cult leadership warped and distorted by arrogance, lies, myths and fantasy, is certain that the average person is little more than a slavering, drooling, idiot, unable to rationalize, guided only by primitive instincts and the need for basic pleasures and security. Hence the cult's elitist antipathy towards markets and personal choices – why give a moron the freedom to do anything including thinking ? Ergo believes the elite, with the right lie, the right propaganda, the right coercion, the dirty, peasant mass can be led anywhere for any purpose – including those involving high criminality. So it goes with the Eco-Fascist, Co2mmunist cult. You are an idiot. They will lie and invent fantasy. And you are expected to prostrate your worthless self and obey. Is this really how civilization proceeds to Churchill's 'sunlit uplands' of better days ?

Fascist cults like the Globaloney Warming-Mother Earth cult seek out to destroy the individual and the moral, juridical and economic personalities of the individual. But as with the Nazis and the Russian Fascists, the cult can only exist and persist, if the lies upon which they have built their fantasy world are not exposed. Once the grotesque distortions and beliefs are revealed as baseless, evil, immoral, and unreal, the cult will begin to unravel. In combination with exogenous and endogenous pressures including war, disturbances and mass uprisings, the cult will cease to exist. It is true with any Fascism – if the people rise up the cult and its gang will be vanquished, no matter how bloody, and how terrible a grip on the population the cult possesses.

Once the lie under-girding the power of the cult is exposed, than the destruction of the cult is only a matter of time.

Globaloney Warming has been revealed – thanks to released CRU documents – to be the largest hoax in history. A massive criminality foisted upon the public to benefit:

-large investment banks [carbon trading schemes worth Trillions];
-governments [taxing and regulating industry and the serf's carbon footprint];
-the UN [a world government built around carbon trading];
-L Ron Gore the Eco-whore [he has increased his personal fortune by $300 million and partially owns the 2 biggest carbon trading firms];
-lying, boorish Academics [grants, money, publications and speaking tours];
-the media [fear mongering sells];
-huge corporations engaged in anything 'Green' [subsidies, tax money] and
-an entire complex of firms selling, advertising and benefiting from tax dollars

All based on lies.

The Eco Fascist nonsense about a warming earth really took off in 1998 when the erstwhile liar and academic dunce, Michael Mann ignored reality, hundreds of other studies and real scientific data and published his hockey-stick curve. It was debunked immediately when Mann released his so-called source data. But the IPCC used it, as did the media and lying high Priests of Eco Fascism such as L Ron Gore. But it was a fraud.

Critics such as Steven McIntyre did not believe Mann. No other data confirmed the Mann hockey-stick hypothesis. It took legal action by McIntrye and others to get the information that should have been made immediately available – if Mann et al were actually interested in real science. Within a few days McIntyre showed that the statistics were so flawed that you could feed in random data, and still make the same hockey stick shape nine times out of ten. Any data fed into Mann's model produced the same result ! But yet the IPCC and Mann maintained that it had been 'scientifically peer reviewed'! By who exactly, the other Eco-Fascist mafia members?

When real data was fed in, the hockey stick collapsed. The reality is this: the earth has been in a cooling phase for the past 500 years and there has been no discernible increase in overall global temperature in the past 20 years:




Mann's fraud was exposed and the hockey stick graph was dropped by the IPCC. But another Tree Ring fraud used by another 'scientist' was invented [conveniently enough] just as Mann's was exposed as a lie. It showed [coincidentally of course], the same temperature spike in the late 20th century that Mann's 'scientifically peer-reviewed data' had showed. It was termed the Briffa curve after its inventor. And invented it was. Incredibly Briffa used only 12 Trees in his tree ring analysis and confirmed the Mann hockey stick temperature spike in the late 20th century. It was 'peer-reviewed' and passed of course – by the same little cabal which peer-reviewed Mann's fraud.

But that pesky McIntyre did it again in 2009. He waited 3 years to get the data and it took less than 3 days to expose it as a fraud. For over 9 years Briffa had lied about his findings. McIntyre uncovered the base fact that Briffa only had 12 trees in his sampling – all from Russia. And one tree was an outlier which forced the results for temperature upwards ! When McIntyre graphed another 34 trees from the same region of Russia, there was no Hockey Stick. When confronted with this inconvenient fraud the IPCC and its media allies just shrugged and said the same refrain – it was all peer reviewed therefore the science is settled. Sure it is.




It is clear that the earth is in a downward cooling trend. McIntyre's efforts confirm that there is no massive increase in the past 20 years in global temperatures. The UN models have been proven baseless and other observatory apparati including satellite, ocean readings and tropospheric data confirm that the earth is actually cooling, not heating up.

As Craig Loehle and others have proven temperatures were much higher 1000 years ago, and much cooler 300 years ago. In other words, the world started warming up from the depths of the little ice age, long before modern industrialization. But the longer term trend is still downwards – towards cooling if we view climate over 1000 years. If the below chart was a chart of a stock price, the technical analysts would be suggesting you sell it – the price will go down further, long before it goes up.



Thank God [or Allah in the post modern relativity world of madness], for McIntyre, Loehle and people of their skill and intelligence. They have debunked the cult's core myth – that the earth's temperature is tied to Co2 levels and that the nasty, evil human is responsible for the coming death of dear Mother Earth. The idea is not only wrong, it is immoral, demonic and quite insane.

As with all cults, the Eco-Fascist cult will feed the hoi-polloi lies, propaganda, myths parading as 'facts' and use 'science' to buttress their bizarre claims. The Russian Fascists or Communist imperialists, the Nazis, the Muslim Jihad, and of course the church of Globaloney Warming all manipulate the mass with various techniques to coerce compliance. At the root and core is the belief of course, that you, the unwashed peasant who never went to Harvard, is an idiot. Ergo you will and must believe everything the cult feeds you. For instance, if the earth is in a long-term cooling trend, you will be told the opposite – and expected to obey. If Co2 a natural chemical which is less than 1% of all gaseous emissions has no impact on climate, you will be told the opposite – and expected to obey.

Fantasy replacing reality. It is high time to erase this cult. If our 'betters' won't do it, than the peasant mass must.

[Sources: Loehle 2007, Haung and Pollack 1997, See co2science.org for all the other peer reviewed studies to go with every orange dot on the map.  McIntyre & McKitrick 2003 and 2005, and update, Mann et al 1998, Briffa 2006, read McIntyre at climateaudit.com, see “ClimateGate”, and  Monckton “What Hockey Stick” (Science and Public Policy Institute paper)]

Globaloney Warming Scam - hide the decline !

Excellent videos highlighting the important factors of history's largest Globalist-Marxist scam.

1.Jones on the International Banking cabal including Goldman Sachs and L Ron Gore, pushing for Carbon trading and associated derivatives – a government run market which would make Trillions for its benefactors which include the United Nations.

2.Beck on the media manipulation and co-interests with Eco-Fascist cabal. The media is as criminal as the quacks calling themselves 'scientists'.

3.Tim Ball on the incestuous 'peer review' scam in which a small cult of politically and socially disingenuous scientists invent data, distort information and then peer-review each other, keeping out 'deniers' and refusing to release their research and then claiming that their lies were 'peer reviewed' [the mafia investigating criminals as it were.....]

4.A great song by Minnesotan's for Global Warming [it gets cold there in the winter time]; mocking Mann of the fraudalent hockey stick fame who encouraged his cabal-colleagues to 'hide the decline' evidenced in real temperature readings. Song title: Hide the Decline.

Globaloney Warming. The Co2mmunists caught 'Green-handed'.

Like psychologically distorted children the Eco-Fascist cult ignores Climate-Gate and the obvious reality that the data supporting Globaloney Warming was invented. 'Man-made' in their own words. But the media, the large corporations who run the media and who have so many green tax-dollars to access, along with power mongering occultists in politics, academics and on those on rich speaking tours; pretend blithely that the fraud does not exist. The criminality of the cult is so perverse and psychotic, that not even the reality of lies, data manipulation, or real scientific facts will stop them. Co2mmunists, Eco-tards and disaffected Globalists want to use Globaloney Warming as a pre-text for Gaia centered Marxism. It is as clear and as obvious as that.

So in the face of facts that the cult and its media-political abettors invented Globaloney Warming, the cult of intolerant little minds, simply goose-steps onwards. Why bother with reality ? If the whole idea is an irrational cult premised on Earth worship, managed by an elite, who cares about whether or not humans have any actual impact on the climate, or Mother Earth's temperature ? So why indeed should the Greentard elite be in the least impacted by a $150 billion scam – larger than the Iraqi Food for Oil program of the 1990s.

Green Fascism shares much in common with Nazi Fascism. Gaia worship and Globaloney Warming are about as intelligent as the Nazi paganism. The Nazis were of course the original modern Green Fascists. Nothing in the Globaloney Warming scam-cum-cult, is any different than what the Nazis tried to effect. It was Himmler and Hitler you might remember, who originally set targets to reduce carbon based energy usage. Germany has no oil and economic and military autarchy was of course a key premise of Nazi theology. The Nazis desired to end carbon resource imports and create a 'natural and renewable' energy source which could be managed and rejuvenated by Germany alone. When war came the necessity of carbon based fuels, fuelled so-to-speak the Nazi invasion of Romania and Russia. Germany needed the oil.

But other areas of Nazi occultism are very similar to current day Green Fascism. The Nazi Aryans you might also remember, possessed an eclectically insane cadre of myths and theories which were 'scientifically proven'. The Nazi cult believed that Aryans were a God race based in Atlantis and which developed a civilization unparalleled in history. This perfect race however was wiped out by heavenly Gods for inappropriate behavior, with only a few surviving and making it somehow to Tibet. There they gave rise to the pure blooded Aryan race which over time and travel found its heartland in Nordic Germany. The Germans were therefore descended from the Gods of Atlantis.

To support this rather moronic myth the Nazis spent tens of millions of dollars 'proving' and supporting their theories. They claimed not only to know where Atlantis had been [the North Atlantic], but also to have 'proven' through medical experiments and investigations that the Tibetans were progeny of the Aryans. Their 'scientific teams' also 'confirmed' that German blood lines were related to the Tibetan and that pure German blood was 'proven' to be superior to any other existing blood lines – especially the blood lines which produced blonde, blue eyed men. Science in the service of the Nazi cult.

It was also 'science' which confirmed the uber-superiority of German blood. The elite army of the SS for example, was largely drawn from strapping blonde-blue eyed young Germans who had to prove their German racial heritage back to 1750. German science had 'proven' that the pure German or Nordic race configured in the guise of SS recruits could father – with state management – a super race. Eugenics and gene management to produce the super-race was thus based on 'scientific facts'. These biological 'facts' as discovered by the Nazi cult, created the Lebensborn program where SS men would impregnate German Nordic girls and the babies would become wards of the state and raised as soldiers. A modern Sparta one could call it.

The Nazis also 'proved' through 'scientific' inquiry into various documents, that the Holy Grail existed in Egypt, and would be found by an Aryan knight, he of the purest blood [of course it never was]. The Aryan knight would be a German and according to Nazi 'experts' most likely it would be Hitler himself who discovered the cup which contained Christ's blood. Hitler was 'proven' by German academics and 'scientists' and theological experts, to be the incarnation of knightly purity and the symbol of Nordic strength. Ergo only he was pure enough to touch the cup of the Christian God.

This 'proof' was provided by the various Nordic myths which existed about a Nordic messiah – but the myths were turned by the Nazis into factual prognostications and 'scientifically' validated. Nazi liturgy also 'proved' through the re-examination of old Nordic myths, and the Christian Bible, that Hitler was not just the Germanic Messiah but another Christ figure; and that the Nazi cult was the guardian of Christian civilization – all of this supported by 'factual research' of Church writings and predictions.

In other words the Nazis claimed that 'science' supported their bizarre myths, theories and reincarnated Nordic paganism. 'Scientific fact' corroborated Nazi claims - or so they propagandized - of blood-racial superiority and the 'dialectically inevitable' will to world power. The supposed 'science' of Marxism married with occultist 'proof' and the perversity and perfidy of biological and genetic 'expertise'. The nexus of these 'scientific facts' gave the Nazis enormous power in propaganda and in arguing that their program was the only possible future course for Germany and the world.

Of course the Nazi declamation that science supported the Hitler cult, was as absurd, as the current Green Fascist demands that the 'science' on climate change - a topic that the human barely comprehends - is closed. So too was 'closed' the 'science' of German superiority. Pagan Fascisms always desire the 'certainty' of their theology - it makes it much easier to manipulate the population.

The parallels with modern Globloney Warming or Climate Change or whatever other pagan name the cult announces are vast. The difference is that the modern Green Fascist cult is not confined to a nation state. It is Globalist in aspiration. Like the Nazis the modern Green Fascist is a universalist. The cult – a loose amalgam of like-minded intolerants – wishes to reorder the world, much as the Nazis wanted to obliterate modernity and install a pagan-Nordic nirvana, ruled by the German super race.

Like the Nazi follower, the modern day Green Fascist has no interest in the individual, in life, in rationality, in real spirituality or in the aspirations of much of the world denied the advantages of a carbon based society. The Green Fascist is the epitome of an intolerant elitist and like the Nazis a firm supporter of what is ultimately a death cult. You can tell this by the policies they espouse. Every single policy act desired by the Eco-Fascists would bring misery to millions. It would impoverish vast swathes of mankind. Many Green Fascists openly muse about the best way to kill humans and cull the herd down to a manageable earth-friendly level. Such ideas are no different than the Nazi programs of extermination for the mentally handicapped, the Jew, the socially unfit, or the Slav.

When facts are known and understood, the world tends to black and white reality – not grey. The modern Green Fascist and Co2mmunard is merely another intolerant pagan worshipper – not much different than the Nazi occultist. The methods used by both cults are the same. The lies, the propaganda, the self-interested elite who ignore reality are also similar. The Nazis were defeated in the most destructive war in history. One has to wonder how the reincarnation of Nazi paganism in the guise of Mother Earth worship will be defeated ?

Globaloney Warming Fraud: Criminal intent.

It is not just the CRU cult center in East Anglia which is implicated in the idiocy of the Globaloney Warming scam – a $150 billion criminality. The media, the educational systems, tax-hungry politicians, the modern Communards and socialists are all involve in the lie of Globaloney Warming. Trillions of dollars are at stake, and the re-ordering of life around a cult ruled by an elite, is now at risk. All of the data, supplied by government institutions have been manipulated and distorted in an attempt to scare the peasant-mass into compliance with the insane and irrational belief that a natural chemical called Co2, 95% of which is emitted by Mother Nature, is somehow shifting climate patterns across the world. A colossal stupidity, which has transpired into creating a colossal fraudulent crime....

The mainstream media will not report on ClimateGate and the obvious revelations detailed in thousands of documents that the 'science' behind Globaloney Warming was nothing of the sort. A criminal conspiracy by a small group of taxpayer hacks illuminates the depravity of the cult and its political masters in national governments, the UN and its media associates. The mainstream media along with government officials have far too much invested in Globaloney Warming to let facts, reality, real science and common-sense get in the way of one-world government; dismembering the modern world; and forcing the average peasant serf into cult worship.

Even NASA venerated for its scientific genius in all matters related to space, is now implicated in data fraud, manipulation and supporting the grotesque lie that a natural chemical called Co2 which is 1% or less of all gaseous emissions, somehow causes climate to 'change'. Chris Horner, a senior fellow at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, has asked for over 3 years to see NASA's data showing the hottest and coldest years in the US, in the past century.

NASA keeps refusing to release its data. NASA keeps changing its collectivist mind about the hottest and warmest years – a measure by the way which proves nothing – by changing its ranking. In 2007 the agency stated that 1934, not 1998, was the hottest year in its records for the contiguous 48 states. NASA now alleges that 1998 and 2006 are tied for first, with 1934 slightly cooler. In other words it has no clue.

“The institute blamed a "minor data processing error" for the changes but says it doesn't make much difference since the top three years remain in a "statistical tie" either way.”
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/dec/03/researcher-says-nasa-hiding-climate-data/?page=2

If the data is valid, it would of course be released and accessed immediately. And as anyone who is rational knows, listing hot and cold years means little. The only conclusion one will reach is that the climate is decidedly unsettled and no warming trend is discernible.

But the fraud is not only about lying or making up stories about 'hottest years' and than denying to release data to 'deniers' and 'skeptics'. The largest carbon market in the world is in Denmark. Apparently Danish and European police have uncovered the largest carbon trading scam in history – worth billions of dollars. A simple precursor of the corruption of 'markets' which will be enacted by the Eco-Fascist cult once they assume power over industry and society:

“Police and authorities in several European countries are investigating scams worth billions of kroner, which all originate in the Danish quota register. The CO2 quotas are traded in other EU countries.

Denmark’s quota register, which the Energy Agency within the Climate and Energy Ministry administers, is the largest in the world in terms of personal quota registrations. It is much easier to register here than in other countries, where it can take up to three months to be approved.

Ekstra Bladet reporters have found examples of people using false addresses and companies that are in liquidation, which haven’t been removed from the register.
One of the cases, which stems from the Danish register, involves fraud of more than 8 billion kroner. This case, in which nine people have been arrested, is being investigated in England.
The market for CO2 trade has exploded in recent years and is worth an estimated 675 billion kroner globally.”

So the entire Co2 trading market worth 675 billion Kroner or about $130 billion USD is a fraud ? Gee what a surprise. That amount matches the $150 billion in direct rich-world subsidies and hand-outs to the entire corpus of Globaloney Warming welfare recipients including universities; corporations; ethanol manufacture and 'clean energy' initiatives.

No wonder the Eco-Fascist cult is so terrified of Climate-Gate. Literally Trillions of dollars are at risk of disappearing. So when facts don't correspond with reality the cult acts as a psychologically disabled person would act: deny, rationalize; slander and spin. Pathologies don't make up science. Cult's are immoral and violent creations. Globaloney Warming is no different than any other intolerant Fascist cult. Climate-Gate makes that clear.

Globaloney Warming and the settling of Post-modern 'Science'.

Climate-Gate has made science a laughing-stock. Little academic and political minds cooking up theories and numbers to justify Eco-Fascist alarmism – all with designs to create a Marxist Eco-topia in the name of serving Mother Earth. Science in other words subverted by politics and greed. Science corrupted by power and money. Science made as irrelevant as any other Post-Modern theology of nonsense. Science regressed to the pre-modern world. No one will ever trust either the scientific 'community' or claims that 'science' has settled any matter, again.

The science of climate can never be settled. The Earth is not a greenhouse, it is a complex of variables engaged in a convection process. Toss in little factors like the Sun, oceanic movements, and the thousands of variables at play in the Troposphere and there is no possibility of modeling climate so that any theory is 'settled' and agreed upon. Just the very idea that something as complicated as climate or any theology about changing climate is 'scientifically settled' is preposterous and just plain dumb.

So what do the little Eco-Fascist minds do ? They play 'science' like a fiddle. Politicians and governments hand over billions to institutes and researchers. In return for money they want support. Academics, fat and prosperous on the public gravy-train force numbers to justify Warming fears. They corrupt data. They manipulate databases. They distort. When asked for back-up and source material, they claim that the original source data is lost. They slander and viciously assault anyone who disputes their 'claims'. The massive complex of Eco-alarmism and Gaia Marxism is fattened with deceit and endless propaganda of doom and destruction.

This is how cult's operate – violence, fear-mongering, propaganda, lies, and theft of money and freedom.

So what do politicians do in the face of overwhelming evidence of scientific fraud and criminality ? With so much invested in the cult they can't turn back now can they ? So on they go, slandering any criticism of their cult, and fixated on remodeling the world in the guise of Eco-Fascist baloney.

The great critic of the Prophet, Michelle Malkin at Hotair.com, rightly ridicules the most-important-man-in-history and his Eco-Fascist zealots for ignoring reality. The politicians, the Earth Czars which now proliferate in every government in the West; the mainstream media which for years has been broadcasting Eco-Fascist propaganda as fact [akin to the BBC in the 1930s re-playing Nazi 'scientific dialecticism' as settled science]; and academic boors and midgets who need to feel relevant and get that upcoming government grant. As Malkin observes:

“The science is settled,” we’ve been told for decades by zealous proponents of man-made global warming hysteria. ....You won’t be surprised by the Obama administration’s response to ClimateGate.

....the White House is clinging to the old eco-mantra: The science is settled.
Never mind all the devastating new information about data manipulation, intimidation, and cult-like cover-ups to “hide the decline” in global temperatures over the last half-century, they say. The science is settled.

Never mind what The Atlantic’s Clive Crook, after wading through the climate science email files of the U.K.’s Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia, called the overpowering “stink of intellectual corruption” — combined with mafia-like suppression of dissent, suppression of evidence and methods, and “plain statistical incompetence” exposed by the document trove. The science is settled.”

The science is not settled. It rarely is. What is settled is the mafia corruption of Eco-Fascist theology. The entire corpus and nexus of self-interested, narcissistic and self-serving imbeciles, all of whom should be in jail. That is what is settled.

It is clear that modern science is not scientific. It has morphed into just another area of relativity and is now a sub-section of the social sciences. The scientific method was long ago corrupted by post-modern cultural Marxism where facts are ignored and 'precautionary' theories based around relativity are elevated. Science is so corrupted it will take a long time to recover. As Daniel Henninger so correctly wrote in the Wall Street Journal:

“What is happening at East Anglia is an epochal event. As the hard sciences—physics, biology, chemistry, electrical engineering—came to dominate intellectual life in the last century, some academics in the humanities devised the theory of postmodernism, which liberated them from their colleagues in the sciences. Postmodernism, a self-consciously "unprovable" theory, replaced formal structures with subjectivity. With the revelations of East Anglia, this slippery and variable intellectual world has crossed into the hard sciences.

This has harsh implications for the credibility of science generally. Hard science, alongside medicine, was one of the few things left accorded automatic stature and respect by most untrained lay persons. But the average person reading accounts of the East Anglia emails will conclude that hard science has become just another faction, as politicized and "messy" as, say, gender studies. The New England Journal of Medicine has turned into a weird weekly amalgam of straight medical-research and propaganda for the Obama redesign of U.S. Medicine.”

Henninger makes an obvious but often-times missed point. Science, under the influence of Cultural Marxism, which is the basis of Post-Modern theory, has mutated from a hard subject, to one of the soft-social sciences. In such a venue reality, facts and experimentation, buttressed by the rigors of the scientific method become secondary. 'Precautionary' principles; emotions; relativity; subjectiveness now take priority.

Science has thus metastasized back into a pre-modern form. Science is no longer about discovering physical laws, or the truth. It is simply just another post-modern tool to abuse for political purposes. That is the real scandal which underlays the Globaloney Warming fraud.

The Earth is not a Greenhouse. Unless of course you are a Leftard or Co2mmunist.

Not a good week for the Eco Fascist cult. The fact that Globaloney Warming is a man-made fraud has been obvious to many 'deniers' for over 10 years. Every myth which sustained the Eco-totalitarianism is being effaced. It is obvious that Co2 does not cause climate to change. It is equally obvious as a recent German paper reveals that the earth is not a Greenhouse – this would violate natural physics. The only people missing the revelation that human induced 'warming' is the largest fraud in history are the mainstream media, the universities and of course the Co2mmunists. The reality that the earth is not a greenhouse, completely annihilates the basic premise of Co2 premised Globaloney Warming. The idea is itself scientifically impossible.

Many sources exist which refute the Greenhouse model and theory. It is obvious even to a layman that the earth is not a glass-enclosed Greenhouse. Life would be impossible if it was. But it provides a convenient metaphor of untruth for the Eco Fascist cult. A greenhouse is something which needs management and nurture. It needs to be controlled. And the Eco-cult are just the people to regulate the earth's Greenhouse.

But as the German study again proves, Mother Earth is not enclosed in a Greenhouse and neither does Co2 have enough mass in the atmosphere to affect climate:

“The analysis comes from an independent theoretical study detailed in a lengthy (115 pages), mathematically complex (144 equations, 13 data tables, and 32 figures or graphs), and well-sourced (205 references) paper prepared by two German physicists, Gerhard Gerlich and Ralf Tscheuschner, and published in several updated versions over the last couple of years. The latest version appears in the March 2009 edition of the International Journal of Modern Physics. In the paper, the two authors analyze the greenhouse gas model from its origin in the mid-19th century to the present IPCC application.

The Greenhouse Model

The paper initially tackles the concept of thermal conductivity of the atmosphere (vital for any discussion of radiative heat transfer) and how it is affected by carbon dioxide, which, they point out, is a trace gas. The current estimated concentration of CO2 is 0.04% by volume and 0.06% by mass. Gerlich and Tscheuschner show that even if CO2 concentrations double (a prospect even global warming advocates admit is decades away), the thermal conductivity of air would not change more than 0.03% -- within the margin of measuring error.

....

Gerlich and Tscheuschner rely on referenced experimental evidence to show what is really going on. The dominant heat transfer mechanism is not radiation, but convection. Experimental evidence shows a greenhouse interior warms merely because the glass physically traps interior rising air, which then becomes warmer and warmer relative to air outside the greenhouse, which conversely can rise and cool unimpeded.

...They show that for a globe the size of Earth, even this simple non-convection model would be unsolvable by the most powerful computers available today or for the foreseeable future -- not only because of the quantity of calculations required, but also because of the impossibility of setting the initial boundary conditions at every point needed to even begin the calculation process.

....

Further, they go on to show that any mechanism whereby CO2 in the cooler upper atmosphere could exert any thermal enhancing or "forcing" effect on the warmer surface below violates both the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics.

.....
Spencer shows how with oceans covering nearly seventy percent of Earth, water vapor and ocean currents totally dominate our global climate. He attributes oceanic and atmospheric circulation in the North Pacific as the dominant modern climate forcing mechanism. As for infrared radiation, Gerlich and Tscheuschner agree with earlier studies that water vapor is responsible for most of the IR absorption in the Earth's atmosphere. Thus, any infrared radiation absorbed by carbon dioxide represents only a tiny part of the full IR spectrum and is affected little by raising CO2 concentration.

Gerlich and Tscheuschner state without equivocation that there are no common physical laws between the warming phenomenon in glass houses and the fictitious atmospheric greenhouse effect which explains the relevant physical phenomena.”
http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/11/politics_and_greenhouse_gasses.html


This analysis is excellent. It is done with real world observations – not with junk database data being forced into a model which forces out answers that the IPCC or CRU want. One can summarize its main ideas and this in effect destroys the myth of man-made Globaloney Warming:

1.At 0.06 % of total gaseous mass, Co2 is obviously too negligible to have any forcing effect, or any input into climate.
2.Water vapor, ocean currents and tropospheric patterns account for climate changes.
3.The earth is not a greenhouse, but a complex interdependence of variables in which convection is the key physical force in creating climate.
4.Models trying to prove radiation and Co2 forcing are by definition not only wrong, but unable to adequately model the number and variety of variables and relationships which make up the convection based climate.

So the entire Globaloney-Warming industry is a scientific fraud. Climate science is not only unsettled, it is more than likely impossible to fully understand. The number of different factors and the possibilities of relationships between these factors are simply too numerous to model. Add in the Sun – which does not appear in any of the IPCC models – and one can confidently take the CRU, L Ron Gore's sermons, and the UN's absurd certainty and throw them in the garbage where they belong.

The Eco-cult desires only control, money and power. In the name of Gaia, the UN, national politicians and their Eco-allies will manipulate all aspects of existence. Massive transfers to the Green cult and their corporate allies; huge new taxes; the regulating of all industry; the micro management of every aspect of the unwashed peasant's life – this is the Brave New World of Eco-Fascism.

All based on lies. All based on a fraud.

Embrace the cult if you will. But don't tell the rest of us that you are moral, superior or enlightened. You are none of these. You are just a goose-steeping Eco Fascist moron, unable to think singing Mother Earth's Horst Wessel's song; and swinging your right arm to Heil your Uber-Fuehrer Herr L Ron Gore.

The Co2mmunists. Marxism and Lies.

L Ron Gore. The Black Jesus [or most important man in history]. David Suzuki. The UN. The Sierra Club. Greenpeace. 'Friends' of the Earth. University hacks parading as professors. The entire media-governmental apparati. What a combination of absolute losers. Yet the hoi-polloi peasant mass, MUST believe anything this group of discontented Marxists and Communists utter ? As a corollary must we believe that Islam is peace; that the West is evil; and that markets are immoral ? The absurdity of the Eco-cult; its members and its theories is only matched by Islam; the UN; and the modern Fascisms foisted upon the world in Germany and Russia. 'Climate-Gate' makes that obvious.

Neil Boortz scores a direct hit when he identifies the agglomeration of morons, disaffected idiots and mental cases which make up the Eco-movement:

“When the cold war ended the world was littered with disaffected and discouraged communists and socialists. Their precious ideal of one world under Communism had melted away before their eyes. The Berlin Wall was aggregate and the Soviet Union was breaking apart. The precious hammer and sickle was being replaced by a Russian flag of red, white and blue stripes. These lost communists and anti-capitalists needed a new next. They were homeless. Where to turn?

The founder of the environmental group Greenpeace can tell you where these lost communists went. They headed straight for the environmental movement. Within weeks of the fall of the Soviet Union Greenpeace offices and rallies were suddenly crowded with unkempt people wearing Che Guevara t-shirts and Mao hats. This was the chosen new way to attack capitalism; not through the recitation of Communist doctrine, but through phony environmental concerns. Now capitalism was to be attacked not for its oppression of the working man, but for its affect on pour creeks, our lakes, and the air we breathe. The environmental movement became the home of anti-capitalists around the world.”

The mindlessness of Communism is not debatable. It negates, the moral, the juridical, the economic and the free man. It places dogma, processes and control above human life. Free will is destroyed. Reality is supplanted by a not so Brave New World of state violence and manufactured coercion.

Communism and the Eco-Fascist movement have much in common. The Nazis were the original Greenies of course. The Russian Fascists or Communists, were more sanguine about the environment as a tour of Russia or Eastern Europe today reveals – the monumental destruction by the state visited upon the environment. In comparison Europe and North America are not only clean, but have seen a real increase in water and air quality, the extent of forest coverage and the use of technology to protect Mother Earth. 92 % of North America still lies under the control of dear Gaia. Only 8% of the US is urbanized or distorted by humans. Even taking into account human raw material extraction, vast natural biomass tracts of North America and huge portions of Europe are not only protected, but flourishing.

Communism seeks the destruction of capital, money, markets, technology and personal choice. The State will own and operate everything. Your only role is to obey, repeat state propaganda and wave the requisite banners on state holidays. Thinking, working, innovating, feeling, and being human is disavowed. The cult rules. You are just a mindless robot.

The Eco-Fascists have the same ideals. Boortz is exactly right. Socialist and Marxist androids and losers have found their sustenance in 'saving the planet'. Like the Communists, they lie, cheat, pilfer, engage in violence, and come up with mind-numbing 'theories' to explain why their program must be followed. And like the distortions and outrageous deceit propagated by Hegel and Marx, but presented in a 'determinatist dialectic'; the Eco-Fascists claim that 'science' supports their occult irrationality. Lenin and Stalin also claimed that Marxist determinism 'proved' that capitalism would collapse and Communism triumph.

This is why 'Climate Gate' which goes unreported in the mainstream media is so important. It reveals a level of criminality unmatched in the world of science in the modern era. All for the money and all for power. Globaloney Warming or Climate Change has nothing to do with science of course. It has everything to do with paper green; and the cult of political power. As the WSJ so rightly comments:

“And all this is only a fraction of the $94 billion that HSBC Bank estimates has been spent globally this year on what it calls "green stimulus"—largely ethanol and other alternative energy schemes—of the kind from which Al Gore and his partners at Kleiner Perkins hope to profit handsomely.

Supply, as we know, creates its own demand. So for every additional billion in government-funded grants (or the tens of millions supplied by foundations like the Pew Charitable Trusts), universities, research institutes, advocacy groups and their various spin-offs and dependents have emerged from the woodwork to receive them.” http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703939404574566124250205490.html

So the Communist losers and Eco-Fascists have gobbled up a $100 billion this year ? Oh, so that means of course that they have NO incentive to keep the scam going. They are simply moral and disengaged scientists saving the planet for the children's future. Yeah right. L Ron Gore the Eco-whore's net wealth has increased from $2 million to over $300 million. He and his little band of merry Communist friends have every incentive to fear monger over Climate Change or Globaloney Warming. Lots of money and power at stake.

And what of the science ? Well it does not exist as Climate-Gate makes clear. The science is decidedly unsettled. A real scientist and MIT emeritus Prof. Lindzen has for 10 years been railing against this fraud. He likens Climate Change to bait and switch marketing – all designed for the profit of the marketer:

“...The answer brings us to a scandal that is, in my opinion, considerably greater than that implied in the hacked emails from the Climate Research Unit (though perhaps not as bad as their destruction of raw data): namely the suggestion that the very existence of warming or of the greenhouse effect is tantamount to catastrophe. This is the grossest of "bait and switch" scams. It is only such a scam that lends importance to the machinations in the emails designed to nudge temperatures a few tenths of a degree.

The notion that complex climate "catastrophes" are simply a matter of the response of a single number, GATA, to a single forcing, CO2 (or solar forcing for that matter), represents a gigantic step backward in the science of climate. Many disasters associated with warming are simply normal occurrences whose existence is falsely claimed to be evidence of warming. And all these examples involve phenomena that are dependent on the confluence of many factors.

Our perceptions of nature are similarly dragged back centuries so that the normal occasional occurrences of open water in summer over the North Pole, droughts, floods, hurricanes, sea-level variations, etc. are all taken as omens, portending doom due to our sinful ways (as epitomized by our carbon footprint). All of these phenomena depend on the confluence of multiple factors as well.”
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703939404574567423917025400.html

Lindzen is perfectly accurate. Co2 contributes less than 1% of all emissions. How can the human which affects only 5% of Co2 levels [the rest is from nature], possibly change any climate ? And why can't IPCC and CRU models, 'model', the decline in the mean global temperature between 1945 and 1975, even as Co2 levels increased markedly post World War 2? They can't model anything accurately, but yet we are supposed to genuflect and have 'faith' in their predictions that the world will end in 2017 [Prince Charles]; 2018 [L Ron Gore]; or at least in 2100 [the Useless Nations]. What a crock.

At some point people have to sharpen their pitchforks, revolt and start the process of culling the human herd of Marxist and Communist idiots. The only way a Fascism is destroyed is through war. The Eco-cult will need to be utterly crushed and effaced.

Eco-Fascism gone wild. Climate Gate blows up the Globaloney Warming scam.

The mainstream media continues to ignore the greatest scientific fraud in a generation. A golfer having a car accident is front page news. A totalitarian Mother Earth cult, with designs to rule the world in the name of 'science' is uncovered as a criminal fraud, and the story gets buried somewhere on page 15 between pictures of drowning polar bears and claims by the simpleton Queen of England that a climate agreement is a necessity.

Yet the reality is this; Globaloney Warming, like Globaoney Cooling is finished. No sentient person who does not watch American Idol, who can still walk upright, and who has little trouble tying their shoelaces is ever going to believe government and the 'scientific community' on anything to do with 'climate change'. Meaning that most of Hollywood, the media complex, the university system, and lovers of cultural Marxism will ignore the news. But the scam is over. What should remain is returning stolen public money and putting the criminals into jail.

Only the Internet is reporting the largest fraud in history – one which even outstrips the $100 billion Iraq food for Oil criminality – which the media likewise ignored. Only bloggers and rationalists on the Net have posted the black and white fact that Dr Phil Jones of the CRU and his friends have lied, distorted and criminalized climate research. When Dr. Fake Phil was asked by the US congress to provide proof of his cult's institute's claims that Mother Earth was heating up like a popcorn bag in a microwave the 'incredibly intelligent First Minister of Lying' told the American legislative body that he lost the data. But of course we have to believe his institute's every word – anyone who 'loses their data' is of course professional and can be trusted. Maybe his doggy ate it.

“SCIENTISTS at the University of East Anglia (UEA) have admitted throwing away much of the raw temperature data on which their predictions of global warming are based.

It means that other academics are not able to check basic calculations said to show a long-term rise in temperature over the past 150 years.

The UEA’s Climatic Research Unit (CRU) was forced to reveal the loss following requests for the data under Freedom of Information legislation.

The data were gathered from weather stations around the world and then adjusted to take account of variables in the way they were collected. The revised figures were kept, but the originals — stored on paper and magnetic tape — were dumped to save space when the CRU moved to a new building.”

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article6936328.ece

How convenient. So the lies and data distortions cannot be given to the peasant mass, because the doggy ate the data.

This does support of course, the mainstream media's contention, and the CRU and other 'scientists' claims that they are so smart, so clever, so 'out of there' in intelligence, that the average person could never possibly understand what they are doing. Ergo, there is no point in revealing documents, 'proof', or even having 'peers' review the data. No one is smart enough to do it.

The best summary of the Climate-Gate criminality and scandal is by British scientist Christopher Booker who wrote; “The Real Global Warming Disaster: Is the Obsession with 'Climate Change' Turning Out to be the Most Costly Scientific Blunder in History?”. To answer Chris' title, yes it is – so far it has milked $150 billion collectively out of rich economies taxpayers – with no environmental, climate or societal benefit, unless you call 'ethanol-moonshine' fraud, rising food prices, subsidies to GE and huge conglomerations; and the funding of eco-idiots parading as 'scientists' beneficial. As Booker states:

“Professor Philip Jones, the CRU's director, is in charge of the two key sets of data used by the IPCC to draw up its reports. Through its link to the Hadley Centre, part of the UK Met Office, which selects most of the IPCC's key scientific contributors, his global temperature record is the most important of the four sets of temperature data on which the IPCC and governments rely – not least for their predictions that the world will warm to catastrophic levels unless trillions of dollars are spent to avert it.

Dr Jones is also a key part of the closely knit group of American and British scientists responsible for promoting that picture of world temperatures conveyed by Michael Mann's "hockey stick" graph which 10 years ago turned climate history on its head by showing that, after 1,000 years of decline, global temperatures have recently shot up to their highest level in recorded history. .....

Since 2003, however, when the statistical methods used to create the "hockey stick" were first exposed as fundamentally flawed by an expert Canadian statistician Steve McIntyre , an increasingly heated battle has been raging between Mann's supporters, calling themselves "the Hockey Team", and McIntyre and his own allies, as they have ever more devastatingly called into question the entire statistical basis on which the IPCC and CRU construct their case. ....

This in itself has become a major scandal, not least Dr Jones's refusal to release the basic data from which the CRU derives its hugely influential temperature record, which culminated last summer in his startling claim that much of the data from all over the world had simply got "lost". Most incriminating of all are the emails in which scientists are advised to delete large chunks of data, which, when this is done after receipt of a freedom of information request, is a criminal offence.

.....

The second and most shocking revelation of the leaked documents is how they show the scientists trying to manipulate data through their tortuous computer programmes, always to point in only the one desired direction – to lower past temperatures and to "adjust" recent temperatures upwards, in order to convey the impression of an accelerated warming. This comes up so often (not least in the documents relating to computer data in the Harry Read Me file) that it becomes the most disturbing single element of the entire story. This is what Mr McIntyre caught Dr Hansen doing with his GISS temperature record last year (after which Hansen was forced to revise his record), and two further shocking examples have now come to light from Australia and New Zealand.

.....

The third shocking revelation of these documents is the ruthless way in which these academics have been determined to silence any expert questioning of the findings they have arrived at by such dubious methods – not just by refusing to disclose their basic data but by discrediting and freezing out any scientific journal which dares to publish their critics' work. It seems they are prepared to stop at nothing to stifle scientific debate in this way, not least by ensuring that no dissenting research should find its way into the pages of IPCC reports.

....

The former Chancellor Lord (Nigel) Lawson, last week launching his new think tank, the Global Warming Policy Foundation , rightly called for a proper independent inquiry into the maze of skulduggery revealed by the CRU leaks. But the inquiry mooted on Friday, possibly to be chaired by Lord Rees, President of the Royal Society – itself long a shameless propagandist for the warmist cause – is far from being what Lord Lawson had in mind. Our hopelessly compromised scientific establishment cannot be allowed to get away with a whitewash of what has become the greatest scientific scandal of our age.

[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/6679082/Climate-change-this-is-the-worst-scientific-scandal-of-our-generation.html]

So we the hoi-polloi, the people who are too stupid to understand the great minds behind Globaloney Warming can observe the following about ClimateGate.

-These CRU idiots and their friends WILL NOT release more documents.

-They have not rebutted with other documents or with facts, any of the claims of fraud and criminality found in the 3000 posted docs. [how many other thousands of documents would confirm the fraud?]

-They have not opened up their books, their papers, their people and their processes to a real scientific peer review.

-Over 25 models are being used, yet we are told the 'science is settled' ? How can 25 models which provide different outcomes settle anything ? Seems rather unsettled.

-No peer reviews by sceptics has been allowed.

Imagine you are a scientist circa the time of Newton. You just 'discovered 'for example what you believe to be the law of gravity. Yet many sceptics and critics exist who claim that your data and methods are wrong and that the theory is invalid. So what would you do? Would you not, if you were a real scientist with real proof, now endeavor to convince through experiments and sharing of information with these people the power of your idea and law ? Or would you commit criminality and lie, distort and engage in verbal and intellectual violence ?

It is clear by black and white reality and facts, that the actions of the CRU-IPCC-L Ron Gore complex are guilty of criminality. immediately make them guilty. These people are as violent, insane and insidious as the losers who tried to sell the world Globaloney cooling back in the 70s and 80s.

Investigations into all these people are necessary. As is the returning of money and of course jail time.

[For an interactive graph on the Global Warming in the Medieval period click here – none of the IPCC models, nor insane theories from the climate cult can explain this period of history. Apparently SUVs did not exist circa 1100 AD. http://pages.science-skeptical.de/MWP/MedievalWarmPeriod.html]

Globaloney Warming is Dead. It is over. The scam is revealed.

Climate-Gate, in which posted CRU documents make it clear that the entire Globaloney Warming industry, foisted on the world by politicians, the media, governmental hacks calling themselves scientists, and the Eco-cult is a gigantic lie. Climate-Gate only serves to reinforce an obvious correlation. Ever expansive government has resulted in more scams, recessions, and bubbles. This is simply a fact. Massive mommy-statism also results in moral hazard; market distortions; wealth destruction and the creation of a vested political-media elite which has every incentive to increase their powers through the institutionalization of yet more government funded madness and scams. And so the cycle accelerates.....Globaloney Warming was just the latest in a long list of government organised criminality.

The Eco-Fascist cult true believer denies that the CRU documents which were posted as a public service and not hacked, have any meaning. The kool-aid drinker uses the usual cognitive distortions to explain away a hugely expensive and psychologically damaging fraud – one caused by government, eco-idiot zealots and pagan worshippers but supported whole-heartedly by the media, the educational system and dimwitted politicians seeing a chance for more taxation opportunities and power. Consider this letter to the US true-believer Eco-Czar Ms Jackson [that is Miss Jackson if you are nasty, and what degenerate came up with the name Czar for non-elected officials ?], from a real scientist:


October 27, 2009

The Honorable Lisa P. Jackson, Administrator
Environmental Protection Agency
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Washington, DC 20460

Dear Administrator Jackson:

I write in regard to the Proposed Endangerment and Cause or Contribute Findings for Greenhouse Gases Under Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act, Proposed Rule, 74 Fed. Reg. 18,886 (Apr. 24, 2009), the so-called "Endangerment Finding."

It has been often said that the "science is settled" on the issue of CO2 and climate. Let me put this claim to rest with a simple one-letter proof that it is false.

The letter is s, the one that changes model into models. If the science were settled, there would be precisely one model, and it would be in agreement with measurements.

Alternatively, one may ask which one of the twenty-some models settled the science so that all the rest could be discarded along with the research funds that have kept those models alive.

We can take this further. Not a single climate model predicted the current cooling phase. If the science were settled, the model (singular) would have predicted it.

Let me next address the horror story that we are approaching (or have passed) a "tipping point." Anybody who has worked with amplifiers knows about tipping points. The output "goes to the rail." Not only that, but it stays there. That's the official worry coming from the likes of James Hansen (of NASA­GISS) and Al Gore.

But therein lies the proof that we are nowhere near a tipping point. The earth, it seems, has seen times when the CO2 concentration was up to 8,000 ppm, and that did not lead to a tipping point. If it did, we would not be here talking about it. In fact, seen on the long scale, the CO2 concentration in the present cycle of glacials (ca. 200 ppm) and interglacials (ca. 300-400 ppm) is lower than it has been for the last 300 million years.

.............Best Regards,

Howard C. Hayden
Professor Emeritus of Physics, UConn

All good points. Ignored of course by Miss Jackson - a true believer who constantly refrains that the science is settled. Hayden's letter is valid. Rational. Well thought out. Researched. Supported by facts. If you disagree, fine, argue back with logic and black and white reality